Thomas Orgis

End of media output in remote mode

According to https://developer.arm.com/documentation/101754/0616/armclang-Reference/armclang-Command-line-Options/-mbranch-protection this build I did on my ARMv8.2 phone should enable BTI: CFLAGS='-Os -mbranch-protection=bti -march=armv8-a" ./configure --with-optimization=0 --enable-nagging make I don't see any issue being reported. It do see linker warnings at runtime regarding unused DT entry that may be related to the alluded no-ops on this older CPU ... those warnings are only in libout123 and...

(With instructiuons, I mean including tool calls to verify if a binary has branch protection enabled or not … my memory is rusty….)

aarch64 assembler files are missing PAC/BTI flags

I was busy with this BTI stuff before and figured that, at least for x86-64, all is well by just ensuring that the assembly is not called via indirect branching (aka function pointers). When resarching the issue back then, I came to the conclusion that wrapping all calls to the assembly into C functions that then get all compiler ornamentation for BTI and whatnot enables the compiler hardening without having to mess with the assembly files yet again (like with executable stack before). Can you give...

Erroneous `-D-I/usr/include` added via the CMake buildsystem port

was fixed in 1.32.5

aarch64 assembler files are missing PAC/BTI flags