Share

Mac-on-Mac

Code

Repositories

browse code, statistics, last commit on 2005-08-10 cvs -d:pserver:anonymous@maconmac.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/maconmac login

cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonymous@maconmac.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/maconmac co -P modulename

Show:

What's happening?

  • Followup: RE: Development files added

    Hi! I'm interested in colaborating with Mac-on-Mac, but although I love Mac OS X and try to use as much Linux as I can, I still only work with C++/C# in Windows environment. Do you think I could contribute to Mac-on-Mac? I'm interested in improving Panther compatibility and possibly help make it Tiger/Leopard compatible. I have a Powerbook Titanium G4 500 to test it. Best regards...

    2008-10-02 16:00:57 UTC by marcioantunes

  • Comment: Tiger compatibility

    also leopard doesn't work...

    2008-01-06 08:28:05 UTC by nobody

  • Followup: RE: MoM Abandoned?

    I still see some good uses for MoM. For example, testing out an app made in 10.5 and making sure it works in 10.4, 10.3, and maybe 10.2. Checking for bugs and such. Does anyone really want to have multiple Macs to test this out? I don't think so. It'll take time, but time is money these days. Or just to fool around with the program just for the heck of it. I mean, how about OS 9 on Intel...

    2007-12-12 02:12:55 UTC by speciald

  • Followup: RE: MoM Abandoned?

    I found MoM because I was looking for something to virtualize Ubuntu for PPC in Tiger.

    2007-05-18 06:05:05 UTC by dreamcore

  • Followup: RE: MoM Abandoned?

    I disagree that there is no justifiable use case for MoM. For me, I think the most personally appealing reason to continue the work of MoM is that I do quite a bit of network appliance development for the PowerPC platform (on OpenBSD), wherein quite a bit of kernel modifications are required. For me, it would be far more efficient to have a virtualized environment, performing remote...

    2007-04-01 17:27:06 UTC by bradford

  • Comment: Tiger compatibility

    We beg of you to please port it to tiger!

    2007-01-24 03:05:39 UTC by nobody

  • Followup: RE: 10.4 Compatibilty

    Never.

    2007-01-18 23:18:38 UTC by paulusdebos

  • Followup: RE: MoM Abandoned?

    MoM is abandoned because it has no future. Further development would be a waste of time and effort. MoM is based on virtualisation on the PPC processor and there is no way to make it work on Intel.

    2007-01-18 23:16:34 UTC by paulusdebos

  • Followup: RE: MoM Abandoned?

    I just saw this project and it was love at first sight, but now I found out it wouldn't run on OS X 10.4 and certainly not on Intel Mac, and that is really too bad... this project was unique, and for Intel people it would be great, because some apps only have a OS 9 installer, but a OS X updater, and installing them in OS 9, transporting to OS X and installing the update doesn't always work, so...

    2007-01-02 22:53:03 UTC by kvitske

  • 10.4 Compatibilty

    Is there ever going to be Tiger compatabilty? There are old classic games that I have that don't run well under Classic or under sheepshaver.

    2006-11-18 05:26:40 UTC by celebi23

Our Numbers