Share

EXPO

Code

License: Academic Free License (AFL)

Repositories

browse code, statistics, last commit on 2005-09-14 cvs -d:pserver:anonymous@expo.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/expo login

cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonymous@expo.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/expo co -P modulename

Show:

What's happening?

  • Unsatisfiable classes

    FYI, ran this this through Pellet and came up with a number of unsatisfiable classes: HypothesisAcceptanceMistake, SystematicError , ExperimentalProtocol , RandomError , CoarseError , Error , FalsePpositive , FaultyComparison, ProcedureExecuteExperiment , ImproperSampling , MeasurementError , ResultError , ObservationalError , StatisticalError , StandardOperatingProcedure ...

    2007-08-13 05:22:30 UTC by alanr

  • Followup: RE: Publicity

    Two colleagues independently sent me the link to the New Scientist article. I'm quite excited about the idea of EXPO. I would like to post this to the Semantic Web for Health Care and Life Sciences mailing list, but I'm wondering if I should wait until the Wikipedia page is ready. Any sense as to when it will be ready? Sincerely, Jeremy Zucker Bioinformatics Specialist Dana-.

    2006-06-09 07:32:17 UTC by topramen

  • Followup: RE: Publicity

    Ahh, the reference back to [[EXPO]] probably explains why the circular reference arose. I didn't get a chance to go and look at the history until now - thanks. It should be OK to go ahead and build the article (but save a local copy of the source for the page just in case! :))

    2006-06-08 20:51:11 UTC by ancientbrit

  • Followup: RE: Publicity

    The history shows that it was disambiguated as a circular reference and that is just a guess at why it might have been deleted. -F.

    2006-06-08 20:32:09 UTC by synapse001

  • Followup: RE: Publicity

    Yes, I think that would be a good idea. You might begin with a modification to the disambiguation page for the term EXPO and use that as a springboard to the main article. Unfortunately there are vandals out there who delight in trying to throw a spanner in the works. Sometimes they will delete or deface new entries and the admins don't always pick it up. Alternatively some of the...

    2006-06-08 16:27:36 UTC by ancientbrit

  • Comment: EXPO OWL is invalid XML

    Logged In: YES user_id=1305260 expo was made in xml, and then aautomaticaly translated to owl by Hozo ontology editor. I will inform the developer of Hozo about the problem.

    2006-06-08 15:36:04 UTC by lsoldatova

  • Followup: RE: Welcome to Open Discussion

    EXPO is a proposal and at initial stage. All are welcome to participate.

    2006-06-08 15:31:51 UTC by lsoldatova

  • Followup: RE: Publicity

    I have tried to make an entry for EXPO in Wikipedia, but it was deleted in one day. Maybe I should try it again. Larisa Soldatova.

    2006-06-08 15:29:26 UTC by lsoldatova

  • Publicity

    If I can offer a suggestion: I only heard about EXPO after reading a New Scientist article recently. As a scientific technical writer sometimes involved in creating and submitting scientific papers to journals for publication, I think that EXPO sounds like an excellent idea whose time has come. I am publicising EXPO and related technologies (OWL, for example) to senior scientists in my...

    2006-06-07 16:34:29 UTC by ancientbrit

  • Followup: RE: Welcome to Open Discussion

    Hi, saw the news article on this. Seems like not a lot going on so far with this. What is its status? -- IV.

    2006-06-07 15:45:42 UTC by ivaldes1

Our Numbers