-
Hi Guys,
I've put the code and results into [trac][1].
For the basic tests, null appender, file appender and severity filtering boost log performed roughly **1.5 times slower**
Keep in mind this is **initial results**. The code needs a look over to ensure everything is equivalent and, if not (which is probable), what needs to be fixed.
Cheers,
Sam
Have a read through.
[1]:
2009-11-12 23:46:19 UTC by sgundry
-
Yep, I've had problems with sourceforge mail being marked as spam.
When I sent the first message I wasn't logged in properly so I'm not sure what the sender address is. Maybe noreply@sourceforge? (I was logged in via OpenID but did not have a sourceforge account so it couldn't come from my alias.)
I'll figure out how to use Trac and see if that is sufficient. I'll start a new thread soon.
2009-11-11 23:10:18 UTC by sgundry
-
Dependency is not a problem. The problem is that AFAIK netsnmp usage pattern implies user code generation, which is not in line with Boost.Log implementation and limits extensibility.
2009-11-11 19:10:31 UTC by andysem
-
thanks for replying, nice to know that, i guess wrapping net-snmp could be the way to go maybe, i dont know about your thoughts on wrapping 3rd party libs :) is an already prooven lib but it would create a dependency!
2009-11-11 17:49:19 UTC by jpablo123
-
BTW, there is also Trac available. You can create a ticket and attach files to it.
2009-11-11 16:39:42 UTC by andysem
-
andysem changed the public information on the Boost.Log project.
2009-11-11 16:35:56 UTC by andysem
-
2 sgundry:
The sole message I received from you was marked as spam, so I didn't see it. However, that message didn't contain any questions, so I guess I didn't miss anything. :)
The best way to contact me is through email. You can use the SourceForge alias to do this. I think, SourceForge should pass attachments through, so you can try to send test cases that way. Regarding the results, I...
2009-11-11 16:21:27 UTC by andysem
-
This feature is in TODO list. However, I have no idea of when or how it will be implemented.
2009-11-11 15:57:13 UTC by andysem
-
thanks!!! hehe i dont think i know how to send a private message! i will find out how and and send you!!
2009-11-11 15:17:40 UTC by jpablo123
-
I'm hesitant to post my results at this stage since I may not have coded both log4cxx and boost-log equivalently. I would like Andrey and others to have a look at it the code first.
By the way, I didn't expect you to post your email address on here but you could send me a _private_ message via sourceforge.
2009-11-11 01:42:22 UTC by sgundry
