From: Rolf V. <rol...@he...> - 2003-04-23 16:33:39
|
Hi, all. Months ago I was working on the Java parser, and stopped because of the unstability and complexity of the spec, while I found at the same time a simpler alternative for my use cases. I would like to invite any of you to continue where I left (or just begin a new Java parser), since I have no more time to work on it. There are two codebases, one at: www.helide.com/g/yaml/ and one in the CVS section of www.sourceforge.net/projects/ogdl/ The last one is 'newer' but complexer. Best regards. Rolf Veen |
From: Brian I. <in...@tt...> - 2003-04-23 22:22:32
|
On 23/04/03 18:31 +0200, Rolf Veen wrote: > Hi, all. > > Months ago I was working on the Java parser, and stopped because > of the unstability and complexity of the spec, while I found at > the same time a simpler alternative for my use cases. > > I would like to invite any of you to continue where I left > (or just begin a new Java parser), since I have no more time > to work on it. There are two codebases, one at: Rolf, Thanks for the tip. I hope someone takes up this cause. I'll be keeping my eyes open for a good Java programmer. BTW, what is the status of these projects? Do they currently at least work at some level? Cheers, Brian PS Thanks again for the time spent. > > www.helide.com/g/yaml/ > > and one in the CVS section of > > www.sourceforge.net/projects/ogdl/ > > The last one is 'newer' but complexer. > > Best regards. > Rolf Veen > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Yaml-core mailing list > Yam...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/yaml-core |
From: Rolf V. <rol...@he...> - 2003-04-24 07:30:41
|
Brian Ingerson wrote: > BTW, what is the status of these projects? Do they currently at least > work at some level? The snapshot at www.helide.com/g/yaml/ worked for about 70% of the YAML productions at that time (may 2002), and loaded most of the examples in the spec. Transfers (types) where not handled. The CVS code is somewhat beter in structure but unstable. Anyway, I'll stay on this list, so I can answer questions as they come up. Cheers. Rolf. |