From: Marco C. <cos...@sc...> - 2007-05-29 17:52:46
|
Dear xine people, aaxine wants /usr/lib/libX11.so and complains if it is not found. On recent Ubuntu, there are instead only /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 and /usr/lib/libX11.so.6.2.0 Best regards, Marco Costantini |
From: David S. <sh...@sp...> - 2007-06-03 17:24:31
|
Marco Costantini wrote: > Dear xine people, > aaxine wants /usr/lib/libX11.so and complains if it is not found. > On recent Ubuntu, there are instead only /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 > and /usr/lib/libX11.so.6.2.0 > On my system (Ubuntu 7.04), libX11.so is just a symlink to libX11.so.6.2.0 (and so is libX11.so.6). So... cd /usr/lib sudo ln -s libX11.so.6.2.0 libX11.so |
From: Darren S. <li...@yo...> - 2007-06-03 18:20:30
|
I demand that David Shochat may or may not have written... > Marco Costantini wrote: >> aaxine wants /usr/lib/libX11.so and complains if it is not found. On >> recent Ubuntu, there are instead only /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 and >> /usr/lib/libX11.so.6.2.0 Bug. It should be using dlopen("libX11.so.6"); this really needs to be determined at compile time, though, in case the soname is different. > On my system (Ubuntu 7.04), libX11.so is just a symlink to libX11.so.6.2.0 > (and so is libX11.so.6). That's because you have libx11-dev installed. [snip] -- | Darren Salt | linux or ds at | nr. Ashington, | Toon | RISC OS, Linux | youmustbejoking,demon,co,uk | Northumberland | Army | + Use more efficient products. Use less. BE MORE ENERGY EFFICIENT. Any given program costs more and takes longer. |