winmerge-development Mailing List for WinMerge
Windows visual diff and merge for files and directories
Brought to you by:
christianlist,
grimmdp
You can subscribe to this list here.
2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(15) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
|
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(1) |
2008 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(3) |
2009 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2012 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2013 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2014 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Simon F. <si...@vi...> - 2020-07-03 14:04:03
|
Hello, My organization uses WinMerge extensively as part of its manual testing process. I recently downloaded a version of the source code and added a feature whereby files can be compared "alphanumerically", with numerical segments in the files compared as numbers (subject to numerical tolerances) and text segments compared as regular text. I would like to submit those changes to WinMerge.org as per the open-source license, but I can't find out how. Can anyone point me to a description of the procedure for submitting code changes? |
From: Marco S. <win...@ma...> - 2019-06-09 16:24:50
|
Hello all. I’m a Linux user, and the best visual diff tool on Linux is Meld. Meld is not even comparable to WinMerge unluckily. So I started a stub repository on Github to try to create a Qt interface for WinMerge: https://github.com/Marco-Sulla/WinMergeQt I hope the effort is appreciated, and someone would help me with suggestions or code. |
From: Sinthujan k. <sin...@gm...> - 2017-10-12 15:28:29
|
Hi sir/madam I saw ur application winmerge just now.yes its very nice and i want to know its source code sir could you send it to me please its very help to my project sir. |
From: twolkersdorfer <two...@go...> - 2015-07-15 02:19:49
|
Hello, I've written an unpacker dll for XAML files. If there's any interest in it, please let me know and I'll send a short description about what it does and why I needed to create it. Thorben |
From: me <dav...@gm...> - 2014-06-09 14:59:18
|
Hi every one, My name is David. I'm Colombian, I speak spanish, so excuse me for my english. I'm interesting to participate as a developer in winmerge project. In work I use Windows (and we use winmerge all the time), but at home I'm a Linux user from 5 years ago now. Also I've a very good level in C++/Qt, one year ago I started to develope a GUI (in C++/Qt) for a Network Emulator which exists only for the linux console, as a Open Source Project. With my abilities I think I could help with the new GUI for winmerge 3 based in Qt, translations, tests or other things that you consider necessary. I like share my knowledges and not to waste them. I would be pleased helping in this project. Best regards, David |
From: me <dav...@gm...> - 2014-05-16 19:08:38
|
Hi every one, My name is David. I'm Colombian, I speak spanish, so excuse me for my english. I'm interesting to participate as a developer in winmerge project. In work I use Windows (and we use winmerge all the time), but at home I'm a Linux user from 5 years ago now. Also I've a very good level in C++/Qt, one year ago I started to develope a GUI (in C++/Qt) for a Network Emulator which exists only for the linux console, as a Open Source Project. With my abilities I think I could help with the new GUI for winmerge 3 based in Qt, translations, tests or other things that you consider necessary. I like share my knowledges and not to waste them. I would be pleased helping in this project. Best regards, David |
From: dzzie <dz...@ya...> - 2014-01-24 16:02:07
|
Hi, I recently wrote a basic prediffer plugin and had a couple thoughts on the current WinMerge plugin system that i thought were worth sharing I still program in VB6, so the current COM system was perfect for me. >From the dev wiki: > Current plugins system has many problems: > > no configuration for plugins > no GUI (for config) plugins could load their own configs from either the registry or files on launch. plugin authors could write a small standalone config management utility. I wanted several different types of match types in mine, so did this. > run in the same thread than compare code > messagebox shown by plugin stops folder compare while it is shown This is actually a cool feature if applied right. In the plugin i wrote, i wanted a debug pane that would show before and after text and allow the user to interactively see what was going on and manually edit the transformations if need be before returning the data to WinMerge. Showing the form modally allowed for this to work seamlessly which is a big feature. If the plugin author is accidentally hanging stuff with msgboxes or causing crashs thats their problem as long as those plugins arent part of the main installation. My only wish would be for there to be a way to automatically apply a prediffer based on file extension. Looks like this may have been the intent at one point. I may try to figure out a way to automate the menu clicks to enable my prediffer automatically after I launch winmerge from my main app. I understand the COM plugins are probably going away in 3.x and know C++ COM code is no fun. Just thought i would share a couple thoughts and an example of what I did with it. For those interested Im experimenting with an x86 disassembly standardizer The configuration is through the main apps interface. http://sandsprite.com/blogs/index.php?uid=7&pid=281 https://github.com/dzzie/IDACompare/tree/master/WinMerge_Plugin Anyway its a great tool, thanks for all the hard work. |
From: Michael C. <mca...@gm...> - 2013-10-13 01:09:34
|
Is winmerge 2.x still being developed? I'd like to add a feature. I never bother/remember to save 'projects', so I'd like to add a 'Recent Comparisons' section under the File menu, below Recent Projects. This would remember comparisons done with Open (the Select Files or Folders dialog), drag-and-drop, and the Explorer right-click option. It wouldn't remember file comparisons done from within a folder compare. Am I missing some other ways comparisons can be initiated? Probably the best way to do this is to make both Recent Projects and Recent Comparison into options with an arrow on the right that pops out the history when you mouseover it. So the file menu would look like this: New Ctrl+N Open... Ctrl+O (blah blah) Save Project... Recent Projects > Recent Comparisons > Exit This should allow the number shortcuts to still work, I think (mouse-over Recent Projects to reveal the list, press '1', and the top recent project should load. same for recent comparisons). My questions are.. Is it ok for me to add this? Or has this been suggested before and rejected? Is this going to be harder than I think it will be? :D It doesn't seem too complicated... just have to store two paths per item instead of one Is this format ok for the recent comparison entries? : 1 C:\Path\...\filename1.txt <> C:\Path\...\filename2.txt 2 C:\Path\...\folder1 <> C:\Path\...\folder2 Or maybe the separator should be <--> or <==> or | Should I do winmerge 3 instead? Maybe you already have this in wm3? If you're ok with me adding this, I'll send a patch, as mentioned here: http://wiki.winmerge.org/wiki/Help_Needed#Get_the_code.21 Thanks, Michael -- Sent from my mind |
From: Kimmo V. <ki...@wi...> - 2013-02-06 17:19:56
|
Hi, as it seems there is still serious work done on 2.x. WinMerge I think the repository would be good to be converted and moved to Mercurial and Bitbucket. Now it is a bit confusing as some code is in "good old" SVN at sf.net and some (web pages) are in Mercurial at Bitbucket. If this move happens then we need to think the name too. Dean's "winmerge" repository is for WinMerge3 (which may not happen that way) so perhaps WinMerge 2.x repository should be "winmerge2"? And the motivation is that Mercurial is way much nicer to work with than SVN. :) Bitbucket allows commit comments and whatever, it is really nice service nowadays... :) [Yes, I have "winmerge-v2" repository but it is just mirror I haven't synched with SVN for a very long time. One can look at it how the SVN repo looks like as Mercurial repo but real work should not be done with it. I can re-synch it with current SVN state once I have a bit more time later this week.] Regards, Kimmo |
From: Christian L. <lis...@ho...> - 2013-01-14 02:47:13
|
All, I’m very happy to announce, that today we have released WinMerge 2.13.22 beta. This one has been very long in the making, it’s been more than 3 years since the last beta release. A beta release is considered ready for final release, but we just want to give developers and translators one last chance to fix any issues before the final release. The release can be downloaded from http://sourceforge.net/projects/winmerge/files/beta/2.13.22/ Translators are encouraged to try out this beta release and submit any translation updates using the usual channels described at http://winmerge.org/translations/instructions.php You have approximately 2 weeks from today, until we create the final release. Regards Christian List |
From: Alex R. <ral...@gm...> - 2012-10-30 21:22:01
|
Hi everyone, As a long time Winmerge user and as a person with a passion for cognitive psychology, I would like to make a recommendation for improving the usability of Winmerge. This was brought up in the past on the bug-tracker, but the issue is now 6 years old: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1504643&group_id=13216&atid=363216 I was just reviewing a project and was surprised to see that directories that I expected to be different were identical. I double-checked everything and verified my comparison filters, then restarted the program and compared again... Eventually I realized that I just didn't notice the difference - it became evident when I went to the menu and unchecked 'show identical'. The problem can be resolved by adding a colour highlight as an additional cognitive aid: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/3258602/screenshots/winmerge-cognitive-issue-highlight.png Why the current implementation is not perfect: - lengths of the texts are identical - the icon contours are identical too There is no visual clue that helps you see things better; one is forced to parse the whole picture at the logical layer in order to grasp the meaning of the displayed information - which takes more time. https://dl.dropbox.com/u/3258602/screenshots/winmerge-cognitive-issue-explained.png At the bottom of the picture I showed a "normalized" version that simulates what a person perceives at a cognitive level in the first moments of seeing the picture. Once the text is blurred and the icon content and colour are ignored - everything is absolutely identical. Based on the above, I would recommend - adding a colour highlight - rewording the text to make it - shorter: "text files are identical" -> "identical" - different: "identical" -> "equal" This way, when you look at a column like this, the length of the text is an additional aid: { different different different equal different } Yes, I acknowledge that the current solution works - go to 'View' and uncheck 'show identical files', but this is an action that - takes extra clicks - still some people fall into the trap, even though they are long-time users I also have some recommendations for visualizing left/right-only differences. If someone is willing to listen to me, I will happily prepare some sketches to illustrate the point. Looking forward to your feedback, Alex |
From: Krishna P. K V <kv....@ou...> - 2012-08-02 06:43:52
|
Hi all, This is Krishna Prasad KV. I know a bit of C++ and Qt. I am interested in contributing the Qt development of WinMerge. About me - I completed BTech from Electronics. Working in Simulation domain from 8 years. Please let me know the current plan and where can I help getting this product. Thanks, Krishna Prasad |
From: Israel L. <isr...@ya...> - 2012-07-17 17:20:06
|
Hi, There's my first e-mail in this group. Well, I love WinMerge, perhaps that works on linux only by wine, not natively, then I loved more when I see the plans to remake using Qt. I was a Brazilian Qt developer, then I want to help in development and translation. I already get the code from svn, but what are the road trip... Where is a list of thinks to be done? -- Regards, Israel Lins Albuquerque * As informações existentes nessa mensagem e nos arquivos anexados são para uso restrito, sendo seu sigilo protegido por lei. Caso não seja destinatário, saiba que a leitura, divulgação ou cópia são proibidas. Favor apagar as informações e notificar o remetente. O uso impróprio será tratado conforme as normas da empresa e a legislação em vigor. * The information contained within this message and attached files is restricted, and its confidentiality is protected by law. If you are not the addressee, be aware that the reading, divulging and copying of this message is prohibited. Please, delete this message and notify the sender. The improper use of this information will be dealt with according to the company's internal regulations and federal laws. * Antes de IMPRIMIR pense na sua responsabilidade e compromisso com o MEIO AMBIENTE. * Before PRINTING think about your responsibility and commitment with the ENVIRONMENT. |
From: Praveen K. <pra...@gm...> - 2012-07-11 17:15:01
|
i am using windows7 32-bit OS...with 8GB RAM Installed Visual Studio 2010 and - Externals\expat\expat.sln - Externals\scew\win32\scew.vcproj - Externals\pcre\pcre.sln were compiled successfully and when i am trying to build - WinMerge.sln ------ Build started: Project: Merge, Configuration: Debug Win32 ------ Build started 7/11/2012 10:34:29 PM. InitializeBuildStatus: Touching ".\..\BuildTmp\MergeDebug\Merge.unsuccessfulbuild". ClCompile: All outputs are up-to-date. cl : Command line warning D9025: overriding '/EHs' with '/EHa' DirViewColItems.cpp DirViewColItems.cpp(231): error C2275: 'std::string' : illegal use of this type as an expression DirViewColItems.cpp(231): error C2228: left of '.npos' must have class/struct/union DirViewColItems.cpp(232): error C2275: 'std::string' : illegal use of this type as an expression DirViewColItems.cpp(232): error C2228: left of '.npos' must have class/struct/union ccrystaleditview.cpp editlib\ccrystaleditview.cpp(129): error C2275: 'CCrystalTextView' : illegal use of this type as an expression editlib\ccrystaleditview.cpp(129): error C3861: 'AFX_ZERO_INIT_OBJECT': identifier not found editlib\ccrystaleditview.cpp(1098): warning C4018: '<' : signed/unsigned mismatch editlib\ccrystaleditview.cpp(1215): warning C4018: '>=' : signed/unsigned mismatch ccrystaltextview.cpp editlib\ccrystaltextview.cpp(503): error C2275: 'CView' : illegal use of this type as an expression editlib\ccrystaltextview.cpp(503): error C3861: 'AFX_ZERO_INIT_OBJECT': identifier not found editlib\ccrystaltextview.cpp(3561): warning C4018: '<' : signed/unsigned mismatch editlib\ccrystaltextview.cpp(3633): warning C4018: '>' : signed/unsigned mismatch editlib\ccrystaltextview.cpp(5153): warning C4018: '<' : signed/unsigned mismatch Generating Code... Build FAILED. Time Elapsed 00:00:02.26 ========== Build: 0 succeeded, 1 failed, 0 up-to-date, 0 skipped ========== Please help me how to compile and build and what are the changes that i have to do compile. |
From: Praveen K. <pra...@gm...> - 2012-07-11 09:43:38
|
Hi, I would like to fix bug in WinMerge https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3528956&group_id=13216&atid=113216 regarding the UNDO option. I have compiled the source code. I need some help how to start and what are the files that i have to go through. Thanks in advance. -- Regards, Praveen Kumar Paluri 07736321687 .. |
From: Kimmo V. <ki...@wi...> - 2012-07-10 13:51:26
|
Received this mail from MS support a while ago and forgot it.. But forwarding to the lists in case somebody is interested in working with Windows 8 support... Regards, Kimmo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Windows 8 Compatibility and WinMerge Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 14:20:10 +0000 From: Danielle Dollinger (N3 LLC) <v-d...@mi...> To: ki...@wi... <ki...@wi...> Dear Kimmos, I am looking to speak about your company's plans to be compatible with Windows 8. I am interested in speaking with the person in your organization who is responsible for the development of WinMerge version 2. We are reaching out to determine what your plans are regarding compatibility with Windows 8 for WinMerge version 2 as well as to provide support and resources on how to become compatible and get certified on Windows 8. Please forward this email with my contact information to anyone in your organization that you think might be appropriate for me to speak with regarding WinMerge version 2. If you need immediate information on Windows 8, visit the Dev Center<http://msdnstage.redmond.corp.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/> or contact me with questions. I look forward to hearing from you all soon. Regards, Danielle Dollinger Windows 8 Product Team 800-508-4291 Ext.316 | v-d...@mi...<mailto:v-d...@mi...> |
From: <aJa...@se...> - 2012-03-25 12:53:25
|
Hi, I would like to contribute to WinMerge project, mainly with some simplier issues I found among yours bugs / feature requests and I have some experience with MFC. If you are Ok with it, I would like to start with this recently added future request "Ability to specify equivalent strings" http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3484771&group_id=13216&atid=363216 because I see it as quite useful feature and not hard to implement. Thanks Ian |
From: Joshua C. <co...@my...> - 2012-01-08 18:38:59
|
Hello all. I would like to inform you, for a class assignment, I have done some work for the WinMerge project. I have implemented the Sourceforge feature request 1841690. I have also fixed the Sourceforge bug 1901659. Please reply to provide instructions for adding my work to the project. Thank you. Josh |
From: <kar...@gm...> - 2011-10-17 11:40:52
|
Hi win...@li... How are you doing? Could you use some extra money? This opportunity is like a dream come true! http://t.co/m3VXHE7u I recently paid off my loans with the money i made from this program. |
From: Sam C. <sca...@mi...> - 2011-10-16 22:03:49
|
I am both a C# and C++ developer. These days the C++ I do is mostly Qt, a framework in which I am passionate. I also happen to own a Mac. In the info on the web site it talks about v3.0 running on Windows and Linux, has anyone stepped up to the plate for the Mac? If not, I would be willing to assist where I can. Sam Carleton |
From: Saurabh g. <sub...@gm...> - 2011-09-24 09:11:11
|
HI, I just joined this forum and like to contribute in the development. I have 10 years of experience on C++ on multiple OS. Need help to choose bug, coding style etc. Thanks Saurabh |
From: Kimmo V. <ki...@wi...> - 2011-08-03 19:25:54
|
Hi, > Thanks for your comments. I'll install AStyle and use that for my > Winmerge repository instead of using the EolExtension. I've read what > I could in the wiki, and on the SF mailing-lists. What would be the > best medium for discussions? The forums? This mailing list? I've used Astyle (be sure to use 2.0 or later) in several projects and although I don't personally like all the style choices it does it is anyway consistent on them. So when everybody uses Astyle the coding style is consistent over codebase. And it also can convert EOL style etc. Remenber to use the scripts (runastyle.bat and runastyle.sh) to run it. Great, the isn't complete (when they are?) but hopefully explains the basic ideas what we want to do. Then there is some discussions on the WinMerge sf.net phpBB forum (https://sourceforge.net/apps/phpbb/winmerge/viewforum.php?f=9&sid=8571c798a397bb26f3726da6e5315749). I don't care if we use this mailing list or the phpBB forum. For me personally mailing list is more practical but I know lots of people prefer forums too. > I think it would be a good idea to have a discussion about how to > proceed with the huge task of moving WinMerge towards version 3. Yep. We've had many plans but very little has gone into any real work. The very basic question is what that "WinMerge 3" would be. I've seen people listing (and wanting) all kinds of features. Now the problem is somebody must have time to implement them. And I don't realistically expect suddenly lots of people appear and start hacking WinMerge (3). So I think the realistic plan would be to not have too big plans but some simple outline what we want to do and what people can do. We can forget (and must forget) e.g. feature parity with WinMerge 2.x. It won't happen. It would be stupid to even try to clone WinMerge 2.x again. What we need is to get the good ideas from WinMerge 2.x what users like and implement them in modern way to WinMerge 3. I don't want to see some 90'ish GUI with small buttons, long menus etc. Second thing is the critical view to the architecture. And get it right from the beginning. Basically plan the architecture to be flexible enough to not set too tight constraints what we can do later on. So avoid error we made with WinMerge 2.x plugins... As small detail, I've thought about using Qt(creator's) plugin system. And even dreamed about using Qt creator's editor component etc. There's a lot of good stuff already implemented... Regards, Kimmo |
From: Philip G. <phi...@gm...> - 2011-08-01 20:18:47
|
Hi Kimmo, Thanks for your comments. I'll install AStyle and use that for my Winmerge repository instead of using the EolExtension. I've read what I could in the wiki, and on the SF mailing-lists. What would be the best medium for discussions? The forums? This mailing list? I think it would be a good idea to have a discussion about how to proceed with the huge task of moving WinMerge towards version 3. Kind regards, Philip On 1 August 2011 20:05, Kimmo Varis <ki...@wi...> wrote: > Hi, and welcome, nice to see some activity here! :) > > I've been on summer vacation so I only just read your tickets. I shortly > commented there. But I think we need some serious discussion about the > editor and its implementation before you run into implementing it. Have > you read the wiki in bitbucket? Or discussions at sourceforge forum? > > About the commits in your repository: > - f9a030a1e6b0 (EOL conversion file): I don't want to pull this. Latest > versions of Astyle can enforce code file EOL style. Nothing prevents you > from using it but I don't want to enforce everybody to use it. > > - 6fc42c709e2b (Removing unused variables to clean up build warnings.): > Maybe. It changes the XDiff code which is external library... I'd rather > not modify it, not for fixing minor warning. We need to update that > library later on and edits mean we need to merge them. Might be trivial, > might be headache. Not forgetting that perhaps we after all want to use > something else than xdiff... > > Regards, > Kimmo > > > > On 7/31/2011 11:12 PM, Philip Goh wrote: >> Greetings List, >> >> I'm going to start participating in the development effort for >> WinMerge 3. To that end, I've raised a couple of tickets in the >> BitBucket issues page and I've begun implementing them. >> In the interim, I have a 2 commits that I'd like added to the WinMerge >> repository. Could someone pull them from my personal WinMerge >> repository? I think the pull request will look something like: >> >> hg pull https://you...@bi.../philipgoh/WinMerge-PG >> >> I'm going to continue working on these tickets, and it would be nice >> to know that my changes are going to get accepted. If the format is >> not acceptable, any constructive comments would be welcome. >> >> Thanks, >> Philip >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Got Input? Slashdot Needs You. >> Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for help often. >> Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey >> _______________________________________________ >> Winmerge-development mailing list >> Win...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/winmerge-development >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA > The must-attend event for mobile developers. Connect with experts. > Get tools for creating Super Apps. See the latest technologies. > Sessions, hands-on labs, demos & much more. Register early & save! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-blackberry-1 > _______________________________________________ > Winmerge-development mailing list > Win...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/winmerge-development > |
From: Kimmo V. <ki...@wi...> - 2011-08-01 19:17:03
|
Hi, and welcome, nice to see some activity here! :) I've been on summer vacation so I only just read your tickets. I shortly commented there. But I think we need some serious discussion about the editor and its implementation before you run into implementing it. Have you read the wiki in bitbucket? Or discussions at sourceforge forum? About the commits in your repository: - f9a030a1e6b0 (EOL conversion file): I don't want to pull this. Latest versions of Astyle can enforce code file EOL style. Nothing prevents you from using it but I don't want to enforce everybody to use it. - 6fc42c709e2b (Removing unused variables to clean up build warnings.): Maybe. It changes the XDiff code which is external library... I'd rather not modify it, not for fixing minor warning. We need to update that library later on and edits mean we need to merge them. Might be trivial, might be headache. Not forgetting that perhaps we after all want to use something else than xdiff... Regards, Kimmo On 7/31/2011 11:12 PM, Philip Goh wrote: > Greetings List, > > I'm going to start participating in the development effort for > WinMerge 3. To that end, I've raised a couple of tickets in the > BitBucket issues page and I've begun implementing them. > In the interim, I have a 2 commits that I'd like added to the WinMerge > repository. Could someone pull them from my personal WinMerge > repository? I think the pull request will look something like: > > hg pull https://you...@bi.../philipgoh/WinMerge-PG > > I'm going to continue working on these tickets, and it would be nice > to know that my changes are going to get accepted. If the format is > not acceptable, any constructive comments would be welcome. > > Thanks, > Philip > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Got Input? Slashdot Needs You. > Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for help often. > Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey > _______________________________________________ > Winmerge-development mailing list > Win...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/winmerge-development > |
From: Philip G. <phi...@gm...> - 2011-07-31 20:12:15
|
Greetings List, I'm going to start participating in the development effort for WinMerge 3. To that end, I've raised a couple of tickets in the BitBucket issues page and I've begun implementing them. In the interim, I have a 2 commits that I'd like added to the WinMerge repository. Could someone pull them from my personal WinMerge repository? I think the pull request will look something like: hg pull https://you...@bi.../philipgoh/WinMerge-PG I'm going to continue working on these tickets, and it would be nice to know that my changes are going to get accepted. If the format is not acceptable, any constructive comments would be welcome. Thanks, Philip |