From: Matthew L. <mat...@gm...> - 2009-03-30 12:37:40
|
I've made the final commit removing files from the CVS repository, at least for the vxl directory. Should I do the same for the www directory? Thanks, Matt |
From: Brad K. <bra...@ki...> - 2009-03-30 12:47:41
|
Matthew Leotta wrote: > I've made the final commit removing files from the CVS repository The README.txt gives this checkout line: svn co https://vxl.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/vxl/trunk vxl I think we should use http for anonymous checkout. Someone can always use "svn switch" if they become a developer later. > Should I do the same for the www directory? I vote yes, as long as all places that checkout the directory have been switched to svn. Thanks, -Brad |
From: Amitha P. <ami...@us...> - 2009-03-30 13:22:04
|
I think there is still the issue of actually updating the web page. The solution, I think, is to use the trac wiki front page as the main vxl page. If no-one objects, I'll create a ticket to do this. Amitha. |
From: Matthew L. <mat...@gm...> - 2009-03-30 13:07:07
|
Brad, I've been meaning to ask you about HTTP vs HTTPS. The sourceforge checkout instructions linked to on the VXL website only mention HTTPS. I've also seen other references stating that one advantage of SVN over HTTPS is that anonymous and developer checkouts can use the same HTTPS checkout path. SVN only prompts for a password when you try to check in changes. So what is the need for both HTTP and HTTPS? I've trying using the HTTP checkout and had some problems. I'm still having the problem reported here http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/vxl/ticket/17 . I'll have to re-open that ticket. Matt On Mar 30, 2009, at 8:47 AM, Brad King wrote: > Matthew Leotta wrote: >> I've made the final commit removing files from the CVS repository > > The README.txt gives this checkout line: > > svn co https://vxl.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/vxl/trunk vxl > > I think we should use http for anonymous checkout. Someone can always > use "svn switch" if they become a developer later. > >> Should I do the same for the www directory? > > I vote yes, as long as all places that checkout the directory have > been > switched to svn. > > Thanks, > -Brad |
From: Brad K. <bra...@ki...> - 2009-03-30 13:27:34
|
Matthew Leotta wrote: > I've been meaning to ask you about HTTP vs HTTPS. The sourceforge > checkout instructions linked to on the VXL website only mention HTTPS. > I've also seen other references stating that one advantage of SVN over > HTTPS is that anonymous and developer checkouts can use the same HTTPS > checkout path. SVN only prompts for a password when you try to check in > changes. So what is the need for both HTTP and HTTPS? I just wanted to make sure it was a conscious choice and not a cut-and-paste thing. I have no strong preference either way. -Brad > I've trying using the HTTP checkout and had some problems. I'm still > having the problem reported here > http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/vxl/ticket/17. I'll have to re-open > that ticket. > > Matt > > On Mar 30, 2009, at 8:47 AM, Brad King wrote: > >> Matthew Leotta wrote: >>> I've made the final commit removing files from the CVS repository >> >> The README.txt gives this checkout line: >> >> svn co https://vxl.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/vxl/trunk vxl >> >> I think we should use http for anonymous checkout. Someone can always >> use "svn switch" if they become a developer later. >> >>> Should I do the same for the www directory? >> >> I vote yes, as long as all places that checkout the directory have been >> switched to svn. >> >> Thanks, >> -Brad > |
From: Matthew L. <mat...@gm...> - 2009-03-30 13:45:13
|
On Mar 30, 2009, at 9:27 AM, Brad King wrote: > Matthew Leotta wrote: >> I've been meaning to ask you about HTTP vs HTTPS. The sourceforge >> checkout instructions linked to on the VXL website only mention >> HTTPS. I've also seen other references stating that one advantage >> of SVN over HTTPS is that anonymous and developer checkouts can use >> the same HTTPS checkout path. SVN only prompts for a password when >> you try to check in changes. So what is the need for both HTTP and >> HTTPS? > > I just wanted to make sure it was a conscious choice and not a cut- > and-paste > thing. I have no strong preference either way. Well, it was a conscious choice, but it may or may not have been the correct one. I was trying to stay consistent with the instructions on the VXL website. Is there any legitimate reason not to use HTTPS for everything? I don't mind using HTTP for anonymous checkouts if there is a reason for it. If there isn't, it seems better to just have a unified way to do all vxl checkouts. Matt > > -Brad > >> I've trying using the HTTP checkout and had some problems. I'm >> still having the problem reported here http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/vxl/ticket/17 >> . I'll have to re-open that ticket. >> Matt >> On Mar 30, 2009, at 8:47 AM, Brad King wrote: >>> Matthew Leotta wrote: >>>> I've made the final commit removing files from the CVS repository >>> >>> The README.txt gives this checkout line: >>> >>> svn co https://vxl.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/vxl/trunk vxl >>> >>> I think we should use http for anonymous checkout. Someone can >>> always >>> use "svn switch" if they become a developer later. >>> >>>> Should I do the same for the www directory? >>> >>> I vote yes, as long as all places that checkout the directory have >>> been >>> switched to svn. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -Brad > |