From: Demian K. <dem...@vi...> - 2009-11-18 14:22:09
|
Apologies again for last week's rather trivial voting request -- I'll try not to overburden the list with picky details in the future. However, this one is important: should we merge my Solr 1.4 branch into the trunk? So far, I don't see a down side -- in my own testing, Solr 1.4 works well. Many people have been using nightly builds for some time without problems. Now that Greg has solved my buildOnOptimize problem, it lets us close VUFIND-13 (spellchecker not working). However, perhaps a bit more testing is in order. What does everyone think? Should we get Solr 1.4 into RC2, or should we wait longer? I'm voting yes on the RC2 upgrade for now, as long as no problems arise that change my mind. I'm going to be away on vacation next week, so I won't be able to act on a decision until early December... but a little extra time for discussion and testing probably isn't a bad thing. If we agree to go ahead with the 1.4 upgrade, I'll definitely be able to get things merged in time for the planned tagging of RC2 on December 4th. - Demian |
From: Eoghan Ó C. <eog...@gm...> - 2009-11-18 14:30:29
|
Hi, I provisionally vote yes also. I will certainly do some local testing before the end of the month, though. Thanks, Eoghan 2009/11/18 Demian Katz <dem...@vi...> > Apologies again for last week's rather trivial voting request -- I'll try > not to overburden the list with picky details in the future. However, this > one is important: should we merge my Solr 1.4 branch into the trunk? > > > > So far, I don't see a down side -- in my own testing, Solr 1.4 works well. > Many people have been using nightly builds for some time without problems. > Now that Greg has solved my buildOnOptimize problem, it lets us close > VUFIND-13 (spellchecker not working). > > > > However, perhaps a bit more testing is in order. > > > > What does everyone think? Should we get Solr 1.4 into RC2, or should we > wait longer? I'm voting yes on the RC2 upgrade for now, as long as no > problems arise that change my mind. > > > > I'm going to be away on vacation next week, so I won't be able to act on a > decision until early December… but a little extra time for discussion and > testing probably isn't a bad thing. If we agree to go ahead with the 1.4 > upgrade, I'll definitely be able to get things merged in time for the > planned tagging of RC2 on December 4th. > > > > - Demian > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus > on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Vufind-admins mailing list > Vuf...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vufind-admins > > |
From: Bill D. <bi...@du...> - 2009-11-18 14:58:41
|
I say put it in. We've been using nightlies for months and months with no problems, and the speed increases and other added functionality is too important to let go. 2009/11/18 Eoghan Ó Carragáin <eog...@gm...> > Hi, > I provisionally vote yes also. I will certainly do some local testing > before the end of the month, though. > Thanks, > Eoghan > > 2009/11/18 Demian Katz <dem...@vi...> > >> Apologies again for last week's rather trivial voting request -- I'll >> try not to overburden the list with picky details in the future. However, >> this one is important: should we merge my Solr 1.4 branch into the trunk? >> >> >> >> So far, I don't see a down side -- in my own testing, Solr 1.4 works >> well. Many people have been using nightly builds for some time without >> problems. Now that Greg has solved my buildOnOptimize problem, it lets us >> close VUFIND-13 (spellchecker not working). >> >> >> >> However, perhaps a bit more testing is in order. >> >> >> >> What does everyone think? Should we get Solr 1.4 into RC2, or should we >> wait longer? I'm voting yes on the RC2 upgrade for now, as long as no >> problems arise that change my mind. >> >> >> >> I'm going to be away on vacation next week, so I won't be able to act on a >> decision until early December… but a little extra time for discussion and >> testing probably isn't a bad thing. If we agree to go ahead with the 1.4 >> upgrade, I'll definitely be able to get things merged in time for the >> planned tagging of RC2 on December 4th. >> >> >> >> - Demian >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 >> 30-Day >> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus >> on >> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with >> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july >> _______________________________________________ >> Vufind-admins mailing list >> Vuf...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vufind-admins >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus > on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Vufind-admins mailing list > Vuf...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vufind-admins > > -- Bill Dueber Library Systems Programmer University of Michigan Library |
From: Chris D. <ce...@ui...> - 2009-11-18 15:12:59
|
+1 Chris On 11/18/09 8:58 AM, "Bill Dueber" <bi...@du...> wrote: > I say put it in. We've been using nightlies for months and months with no > problems, and the speed increases and other added functionality is too > important to let go. > > 2009/11/18 Eoghan Ó Carragáin <eog...@gm...> >> Hi, >> I provisionally vote yes also. I will certainly do some local testing before >> the end of the month, though. >> Thanks, >> Eoghan >> >> 2009/11/18 Demian Katz <dem...@vi...> >>> Apologies again for last week's rather trivial voting request -- I'll try >>> not to overburden the list with picky details in the future. However, this >>> one is important: should we merge my Solr 1.4 branch into the trunk? >>> >>> So far, I don't see a down side -- in my own testing, Solr 1.4 works well. >>> Many people have been using nightly builds for some time without problems. >>> Now that Greg has solved my buildOnOptimize problem, it lets us close >>> VUFIND-13 (spellchecker not working). >>> >>> However, perhaps a bit more testing is in order. >>> >>> What does everyone think? Should we get Solr 1.4 into RC2, or should we >>> wait longer? I'm voting yes on the RC2 upgrade for now, as long as no >>> problems arise that change my mind. >>> >>> I'm going to be away on vacation next week, so I won't be able to act on a >>> decision until early December but a little extra time for discussion and >>> testing probably isn't a bad thing. If we agree to go ahead with the 1.4 >>> upgrade, I'll definitely be able to get things merged in time for the >>> planned tagging of RC2 on December 4th. >>> >>> - Demian >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> -- >>> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day >>> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus >>> on >>> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with >>> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Vufind-admins mailing list >>> Vuf...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vufind-admins >>> >> >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------->> - >> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day >> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on >> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with >> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july >> _______________________________________________ >> Vufind-admins mailing list >> Vuf...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vufind-admins >> > > |
From: Tuan N. <tu...@yo...> - 2009-11-18 16:03:01
|
I vote yes. I am running an instance from the trunk too, and it has been running on solr 1.4 for a little while with no problem. On Nov 18, 2009, at 9:21 AM, Demian Katz wrote: > Apologies again for last week's rather trivial voting request -- > I'll try not to overburden the list with picky details in the > future. However, this one is important: should we merge my Solr > 1.4 branch into the trunk? > > So far, I don't see a down side -- in my own testing, Solr 1.4 works > well. Many people have been using nightly builds for some time > without problems. Now that Greg has solved my buildOnOptimize > problem, it lets us close VUFIND-13 (spellchecker not working). > > However, perhaps a bit more testing is in order. > > What does everyone think? Should we get Solr 1.4 into RC2, or > should we wait longer? I'm voting yes on the RC2 upgrade for now, > as long as no problems arise that change my mind. > > I'm going to be away on vacation next week, so I won't be able to > act on a decision until early December… but a little extra time for > discussion and testing probably isn't a bad thing. If we agree to > go ahead with the 1.4 upgrade, I'll definitely be able to get things > merged in time for the planned tagging of RC2 on December 4th. > > - Demian > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 > 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and > focus on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july_______________________________________________ > Vufind-admins mailing list > Vuf...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vufind-admins |
From: Till K. <kin...@gm...> - 2009-12-01 15:25:36
|
Sorry for answering that late (had really some great time off(-line)). Demian Katz wrote: > However, this one is important: should we merge my Solr 1.4 branch into > the trunk? Yes. Solr 1.4 offers some really nice features for VuFind (specifically usable/faster faceting on multivalued fields). There shouldn't be big issues simply dropping Solr 1.4 into VuFind, the URL interface is basically unchanged. We are running pre-1.4 versions of Solr in our "productive prototype" for months now without issues... Till -- http://twitter.com/tillk |