From: Matt L. <ma...@te...> - 2004-08-15 20:59:15
|
Ok, I'm really new at UML. I'm trying to add SKAS to my host kernel and patch is failing. I'm pretty cluelees at this point. Help? Here's the output: [root@localhost linux-2.6.7-1.494.2.2]# patch -p0 <~/uml/host-skas3-2.6.7-v1.patch patching file ./arch/i386/kernel/sys_i386.c patching file ./arch/i386/kernel/ptrace.c patching file ./arch/i386/kernel/ldt.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 54. Hunk #2 FAILED at 89. Hunk #3 succeeded at 102 with fuzz 1 (offset -1 lines). Hunk #4 FAILED at 123. Hunk #5 succeeded at 187 (offset 15 lines). Hunk #6 succeeded at 196 (offset -1 lines). Hunk #7 FAILED at 229. 4 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file ./arch/i386/kernel/ldt.c.rej patching file ./arch/i386/Kconfig Hunk #1 succeeded at 782 (offset 62 lines). patching file ./include/linux/mm.h Hunk #1 succeeded at 575 (offset 1 line). Hunk #2 succeeded at 635 with fuzz 2. patching file ./include/linux/proc_mm.h patching file ./include/asm-i386/desc.h Hunk #1 succeeded at 123 with fuzz 2. patching file ./include/asm-i386/processor.h Hunk #1 succeeded at 672 (offset 23 lines). patching file ./include/asm-i386/ptrace.h patching file ./include/asm-i386/mmu_context.h Hunk #1 FAILED at 29. Hunk #2 succeeded at 60 (offset 6 lines). 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file ./include/asm-i386/mmu_context.h.rej patching file ./mm/mmap.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 743 (offset 18 lines). patching file ./mm/mprotect.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 189 (offset 4 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 282 (offset 4 lines). patching file ./mm/proc_mm.c patching file ./mm/Makefile Hunk #1 succeeded at 16 with fuzz 1 (offset 1 line). [root@localhost linux-2.6.7-1.494.2.2]# -- Matt When debuggers are outlawed, only outlaws will debug. |
From: David C. <li...@ed...> - 2004-08-15 22:32:19
|
On Sunday 15 August 2004 21:05, Matt Lawrence wrote: > Ok, I'm really new at UML. I'm trying to add SKAS to my host kernel > and patch is failing. I'm pretty cluelees at this point. Help? > > Here's the output: > > [root@localhost linux-2.6.7-1.494.2.2]# patch -p0 [..] What is the "-1.494.2.2" on the end of your kernel version? If it already has a patch set applied then that might be affecting the SKAS patch. If you can, try a stock kernel instead and see if that helps. David |
From: Matt L. <ma...@te...> - 2004-08-15 23:09:53
|
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, David Cannings wrote: >> [root@localhost linux-2.6.7-1.494.2.2]# patch -p0 > [..] > > What is the "-1.494.2.2" on the end of your kernel version? If it already > has a patch set applied then that might be affecting the SKAS patch. > > If you can, try a stock kernel instead and see if that helps. It's the version installed on FC2 with "yum install kernel-sourcecode" -- Matt When debuggers are outlawed, only outlaws will debug. |
From: Eric S. J. <es...@ha...> - 2004-08-16 01:08:01
|
Matt Lawrence wrote: > It's the version installed on FC2 with "yum install kernel-sourcecode" sorry, he meant stock as in straight off of kernel.org. it seems that the definition of stock is a standard as "standard". ;-) ---eric -- Speech recognition in use. It makes mistakes, I correct most |