From: sara <srp...@ya...> - 2004-03-12 08:08:48
|
I want to run 5 UML's in my debian( kernel 2.4.23).I want each uml has to talk to each other.What is the best networking method?.I read that UML_switch or Tun/tap will be the best options.Among these two which one will suitable for me?.Can any one explain the steps involved in setting up a network using uml_switch.I referred usermodelinux.sourceforge.net.I find it bit difficult to understand uml_switch concepts form it.So plz if any one can explain it bit more detail,It will be fine.I am a novice plz help me. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com |
From: David C. <li...@ed...> - 2004-03-12 08:26:44
|
On Friday 12 March 2004 07:49, sara wrote: > I want to run 5 UML's in my debian( kernel 2.4.23).I > want each uml has to talk to each other.What is the > best networking method?.I read that UML_switch or > Tun/tap will be the best options.Among these two which > one will suitable for me?.Can any one explain the > steps involved in setting up a network using > uml_switch.I referred usermodelinux.sourceforge.net.I > find it bit difficult to understand uml_switch > concepts form it.So plz if any one > can explain it bit more detail,It will be fine.I am a > novice plz help me. In my opinion, bridging would be the easiest method here. It is much easier than uml_switch and doesn't require any daemons to run on the host. Please refer to the tutorial at: http://edeca.net/articles/bridging David |
From: roland <for...@gm...> - 2004-03-12 08:37:21
|
> In my opinion, bridging would be the easiest method here. It is much > easier than uml_switch and doesn't require any daemons to run on the > host. hey - what is so difficult with uml_switch? if you just want to connect 5 uml`s with each other internally, i think uml_switch is really easy! regards roland ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Cannings" <li...@ed...> To: <use...@li...> Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 9:07 AM Subject: Re: [uml-user] Best Network Method for Running Multiple UMLS > On Friday 12 March 2004 07:49, sara wrote: > > I want to run 5 UML's in my debian( kernel 2.4.23).I > > want each uml has to talk to each other.What is the > > best networking method?.I read that UML_switch or > > Tun/tap will be the best options.Among these two which > > one will suitable for me?.Can any one explain the > > steps involved in setting up a network using > > uml_switch.I referred usermodelinux.sourceforge.net.I > > find it bit difficult to understand uml_switch > > concepts form it.So plz if any one > > can explain it bit more detail,It will be fine.I am a > > novice plz help me. > > In my opinion, bridging would be the easiest method here. It is much > easier than uml_switch and doesn't require any daemons to run on the > host. > > Please refer to the tutorial at: http://edeca.net/articles/bridging > > David > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > _______________________________________________ > User-mode-linux-user mailing list > Use...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user > |
From: David C. <li...@ed...> - 2004-03-12 08:44:01
|
On Friday 12 March 2004 08:24, you wrote: > > In my opinion, bridging would be the easiest method here. It is much > > easier than uml_switch and doesn't require any daemons to run on the > > host. > > hey - > what is so difficult with uml_switch? > if you just want to connect 5 uml`s with each other internally, i think > uml_switch is really easy! regards This is true, but not if you then want those UMLs to talk to the outside network as well. I seem to have missed the fact the original poster didn't mention whether they wanted this or not, if you wish to clarify this somebody will be able to help you. David |