From: Adam T. <ada...@co...> - 2003-12-31 23:46:28
|
I seem to be having some problems with UML -- I have everything setup = and am trying to get the filesystems working now.. Here is the error... [root@host uml]# linux ubd0=3Droot_fs tracing thread pid =3D 16848 Linux version 2.4.19-5um (jd...@um...) (gcc version 2.96 = 20000731 (Red Hat Linux 7.1 2.96-81)) #2 Mon Sep 16 15:41:15 EDT 2002 On node 0 totalpages: 8192 zone(0): 8192 pages. zone(1): 0 pages. zone(2): 0 pages. Kernel command line: ubd0=3Droot_fs root=3D/dev/ubd0 Calibrating delay loop... 2610.61 BogoMIPS Memory: 30192k available Dentry cache hash table entries: 4096 (order: 3, 32768 bytes) Inode cache hash table entries: 2048 (order: 2, 16384 bytes) Mount-cache hash table entries: 512 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) Buffer-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) Page-cache hash table entries: 8192 (order: 3, 32768 bytes) Checking for host processor cmov support...Yes Checking for host processor xmm support...No Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...OK Checking that host ptys support output SIGIO...Yes Checking that host ptys support SIGIO on close...No, enabling workaround POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4 Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039 Initializing RT netlink socket Starting kswapd Kernel panic: outer trampoline didn't exit with SIGKILL Thanks! |
From: BlaisorBlade <bla...@ya...> - 2004-01-01 10:00:15
|
Alle 00:46, gioved=EC 1 gennaio 2004, Adam Tuttle ha scritto: > I seem to be having some problems with UML -- I have everything setup and > am trying to get the filesystems working now.. > > Here is the error... > [root@host uml]# linux ubd0=3Droot_fs > tracing thread pid =3D 16848 > Linux version 2.4.19-5um (jd...@um...) (gcc version 2.96 20000731 > (Red Hat Linux 7.1 2.96-81)) #2 Mon Sep 16 15:41:15 EDT 2002 2.4.19-5um? I.e. the RPM, probably. But, oh, that version is old and buggy.= =20 I've already seen this panic with old versions, so you should just use a=20 newer kernel(the latest possible). Bye =2D-=20 cat <<EOSIGN Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux Kernel 2.4.21/2.6.0-test on an i686; Linux registered user n. 292729 EOSIGN |
From: Adam T. <ada...@co...> - 2004-01-01 17:39:47
|
Ok I am using 2.5.70 now but when I compile it gives me this error instead... arch/um/sys-i386/module.c: In function `apply_relocate': arch/um/sys-i386/module.c:79: `R_386_32' undeclared (first use in this function) arch/um/sys-i386/module.c:79: (Each undeclared identifier is reported onl= y once arch/um/sys-i386/module.c:79: for each function it appears in.) arch/um/sys-i386/module.c:83: `R_386_PC32' undeclared (first use in this function) make[1]: *** [arch/um/sys-i386/module.o] Error 1 make: *** [arch/um/sys-i386] Error 2 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "BlaisorBlade" <bla...@ya...> To: <use...@li...> Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2004 5:00 AM Subject: Re: [uml-user] Kernel Panic? Alle 00:46, gioved=EC 1 gennaio 2004, Adam Tuttle ha scritto: > I seem to be having some problems with UML -- I have everything setup a= nd > am trying to get the filesystems working now.. > > Here is the error... > [root@host uml]# linux ubd0=3Droot_fs > tracing thread pid =3D 16848 > Linux version 2.4.19-5um (jd...@um...) (gcc version 2.96 20000= 731 > (Red Hat Linux 7.1 2.96-81)) #2 Mon Sep 16 15:41:15 EDT 2002 2.4.19-5um? I.e. the RPM, probably. But, oh, that version is old and bugg= y. I've already seen this panic with old versions, so you should just use a newer kernel(the latest possible). Bye --=20 cat <<EOSIGN Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux Kernel 2.4.21/2.6.0-test on an i686; Linux registered user n. 29272= 9 EOSIGN ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id371&op=3Dick _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-user mailing list Use...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user |
From: BlaisorBlade <bla...@ya...> - 2004-01-02 18:30:39
|
Alle 18:39, gioved=EC 1 gennaio 2004, Adam Tuttle ha scritto: > Ok I am using 2.5.70 now but when I compile it gives me this error > instead... Hmm, ok, I should have said "the latest 2.4 kernel patch", i.e. 2.4.23-1um.= I=20 didn't specify this since 2.5, as 2.3, 2.1 and so on, is an "experimental"= =20 kernel, i.e. very buggy and not yet ready for widespread use. If the second= =20 digit is odd, then it's a development kernel... Bye =2D-=20 cat <<EOSIGN Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux Kernel 2.4.21/2.6.0-test on an i686; Linux registered user n. 292729 EOSIGN |