From: Ryan F. <ry...@fi...> - 2008-04-24 07:19:45
|
I just looked at what it would take to port SKAS3 to 2.6.25, and it looks well beyond my C non-abilities. Porting 2.6.23's SKAS3 to 2.6.24 was mostly an exercise in figuring out what code from i386/x86_64 moved to where, but 2.6.24 to 2.6.25 seems to have reworked a lot of the ptrace/ldt code. Hopefully someone can step up to the task. That's not to say I won't eventually try, of course. However, most of my interest was vested in 2.6.24, as I wanted to upgrade my existing UML base (based on Debian's 2.6.18 tree) to 2.6.24, as Debian will be releasing "etchnhalf" with a 2.6.24 base. And while it would be nice to play with SKAS3 on a 2.6.25 host (for roughly the same reasons I installed Red Hat Linux 5.2 as a UML guest this evening ("because I can"; it actually works flawlessly with the latest 2.6 kernel even though it was designed for 2.0.36)), it's not a priority for my production guests. RF |