From: battipatisainagendra B. <sai...@gm...> - 2007-06-06 11:22:30
|
Hello sir, This is Prasad working on UML.I have tried running UML with latest source from www.kernel.org but I could not get. the problem was as followes.... with 2.6.16 kernel i have given the following commands.... 1.make defconfig ARCH=um 2.make ARCH=um but i am getting an error which is as followes... arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/registers.c: In function 'get_thread_regs': arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/registers.c:137: error: 'JB_PC' undeclared (first use in this function) arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/registers.c:137: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/registers.c:137: error: for each function it appears in.) arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/registers.c:138: error: 'JB_SP' undeclared (first use in this function) arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/registers.c:139: error: 'JB_BP' undeclared (first use in this function) make[2]: *** [arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/registers.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386] Error 2 next i went with the latest kernel i.e..linux-2.6.21.tar.bz2 but when i run command i.e...make ARCH=um it's going on exexuting the same sequence of things....finally i could NOT get the linux bin image. please suggest me which kernel mirror to use which has already uml patch built in.... waiting for your reply..... thank you, rgds, prasad |
From: Antoine M. <an...@na...> - 2007-06-06 12:04:21
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 [snip] > arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/registers.c:139: error: 'JB_BP' undeclared > (first use in this function) > > make[2]: *** [arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/registers.o] Error 1 > > make[1]: *** [arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386] Error 2 > > > next i went with the latest kernel i.e..linux-2.6.21.tar.bz2 > but when i run command i.e...make ARCH=um > > it's going on exexuting the same sequence of things....finally i could > NOT get the linux bin image. > > > please suggest me which kernel mirror to use which has already uml > patch built in.... Try this: http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/work/current/2.6/2.6.17/patches/jmpbuf Antoine -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGZqK6GK2zHPGK1rsRCmiZAJ9dpqlC1yk7Ikc0t1jT3dgKUih2OACeKtW/ zjnT6NYYv8CKgsZalZzpdbU= =O+VI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: Jeff D. <jd...@ad...> - 2007-06-06 13:14:57
|
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 04:52:25PM +0530, battipatisainagendra Bhavaniprasad wrote: > next i went with the latest kernel i.e..linux-2.6.21.tar.bz2 > but when i run command i.e...make ARCH=um > > it's going on exexuting the same sequence of things.... What same sequence of things? The JB_* errors? That's impossible, since those are gone in 2.6.21. > please suggest me which kernel mirror to use which has already uml > patch built in.... Any mirror which carries 2.6.21. Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com |
From: Jeff D. <jd...@ad...> - 2007-06-06 15:02:42
|
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 07:17:45PM +0545, battipatisainagendra Bhavaniprasad wrote: > I have downloaded kernel 2.6.21 merror from following url > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.21.tar.gz > > the following commands are given.......to run uml > > make defconfig ARCH=um > > make ARCH=um > > when make ARCH=um is given i found that it is in a loop finally i > could not get "linux" bin file. The kernel build can't loop. How about providing a build log instead of your vague impressions of what it's doing? Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com |
From: Jeff D. <jd...@ad...> - 2007-06-07 14:06:05
|
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 02:13:10AM -0500, battipatisainagendra Bhavaniprasad wrote: > this is the log that i found........likewise this gets executed > repetedlly....... OK, so it does loop. > make: Warning: File `/root/Desktop/linux-2.6.21/arch/um/Makefile-os-Linux' > has modification time 2e+08 s in the future > make[1]: Warning: File > `/root/Desktop/linux-2.6.21/arch/um/Makefile-os-Linux' > has modification time 2e+08 s in the future > make[2]: Warning: File `scripts/Makefile.host' has modification time 2e+08 s > in the future You didn't mention this timestamp nonsense. How did you think I was going to provide a fix if you don't provide any information? And, have you thought about figuring out what's wrong with your system's clock, and fixing it? Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com |