From: Blaisorblade <bla...@ya...> - 2005-05-10 21:34:38
|
mode_kern-skas.h was named that way for similarity with other headers, which are named -tt and -skas for TT and SKAS specific versions. However, it would be nice to clean up the includes altogether: - we have sysdep inside arch/um/include, and include "sysdep/...."; that's nice. - we should do the same for os-, moving arch/um/os-Linux/include/* to arch/um/include/os-Linux/*, and include "os/file.h" (by doing a symlink) - also, the same (without symlinking) should be done for arch/um/include/skas and arch/um/include/tt, so that we include "skas/mode_kern.h" and "tt/mode_kern.h". Without fiddling with include path depending on the mode and so on. -- Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Skype user "PaoloGiarrusso" Linux registered user n. 292729 http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade |
From: Jeff D. <jd...@ad...> - 2005-05-10 23:01:14
|
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:23:26PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > - we have sysdep inside arch/um/include, and include "sysdep/...."; that's > nice. > > - we should do the same for os-, moving arch/um/os-Linux/include/* to > arch/um/include/os-Linux/*, and include "os/file.h" (by doing a symlink) > > - also, the same (without symlinking) should be done for arch/um/include/skas > and arch/um/include/tt, so that we include "skas/mode_kern.h" and > "tt/mode_kern.h". Without fiddling with include path depending on the mode > and so on. Yeah, I agree, this sounds better than what we have now. Jeff |