Yeah, I know about this problem. The problem is, that Kylix uses different syntax of some functions and I am afraid, there are missing some classes I'm using. I already tought about it, but this would require to rewrite about 25% amount of code. Kylix is fine for me, I'm using it mainly because it has a perfect IDE with great debugging abilities. When I was starting this project I had to make a decision, whether use Kylix or FPC. Kylix won due to IDE.
BUT, I don't say that it is impossible to port tuxcmd also to FPC, but somebody else would have to do it :-)
It will probably not conflict with my development, many parts of code are stable enough and they won't be modified a lot.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Wat are the current problems regarding using Free Pascal.? (1.0.x and 1.1.x respectively)
(this would make deployment on odd Linux distro's easier, and add a few targets like the *BSDs)
Yeah, I know about this problem. The problem is, that Kylix uses different syntax of some functions and I am afraid, there are missing some classes I'm using. I already tought about it, but this would require to rewrite about 25% amount of code. Kylix is fine for me, I'm using it mainly because it has a perfect IDE with great debugging abilities. When I was starting this project I had to make a decision, whether use Kylix or FPC. Kylix won due to IDE.
BUT, I don't say that it is impossible to port tuxcmd also to FPC, but somebody else would have to do it :-)
It will probably not conflict with my development, many parts of code are stable enough and they won't be modified a lot.