From: Nigel K. <nig...@gm...> - 2008-03-16 20:09:51
|
good folk, I just submitted http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1915675&group_id=48857&atid=454375 , I would appreciate it if a committer could let me know when or if it can be applied. See the patch description for more gorey details. In particular, though, I'd note that 1. CTest now enabled via this patch: a test target is added, and all tests added are run. "tests" are just executables, that exit with non-zero on any failure. There is one test there now, a somewhat primitive test versus my date/time functions. This has been useful to me in getting things correct, and any sort of non-gui computation could probably benefit from such automated tests of normal and boundary conditions. (However: having just pressed the submit button, i realize the test i've got for whether Qt understands EST/EDT time won't work in any other timezone...argh...). 2. timezone detection works on the following principles: a. we don't care what the name of the local timezone is, just the GMT offset b. we let Qt figure all that out, we rely on QDateTime's .toUTC() to provide the offset. c. (as a consequence of b) if Qt doesn't know details about the shift for a point in the past or future, we fall back to shift at the present. I've seen the code in question for #2 work on a mac and a windows xp machine with Qt 4.3.4: selecting various dates in the last year, I can get reliably the right offset-from-GMT. i'm pretty sure the date-time dialog box isn't in its final appearance, but it is serviceable now. cheers, Nigel |
From: F. C. <fab...@go...> - 2008-03-17 08:42:46
|
Hi Nigel, Thank for the patch! It looks promisin. However could you please clean your patch? 80% of it's content are just suppressing tabs and space... It is important that patches contain the minimum modifications otherwise it takes ages to check.. Cheers, Fabien On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 9:09 PM, Nigel Kerr <nig...@gm...> wrote: > good folk, > > I just submitted > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1915675&group_id=48857&atid=454375 > , I would appreciate it if a committer could let me know when or if it > can be applied. See the patch description for more gorey details. > > In particular, though, I'd note that > > 1. CTest now enabled via this patch: a test target is added, and all > tests added are run. "tests" are just executables, that exit with > non-zero on any failure. There is one test there now, a somewhat > primitive test versus my date/time functions. This has been useful to > me in getting things correct, and any sort of non-gui computation > could probably benefit from such automated tests of normal and > boundary conditions. (However: having just pressed the submit button, > i realize the test i've got for whether Qt understands EST/EDT time > won't work in any other timezone...argh...). > > 2. timezone detection works on the following principles: > a. we don't care what the name of the local timezone is, just the GMT > offset > b. we let Qt figure all that out, we rely on QDateTime's .toUTC() to > provide the offset. > c. (as a consequence of b) if Qt doesn't know details about the shift > for a point in the past or future, we fall back to shift at the > present. > > I've seen the code in question for #2 work on a mac and a windows xp > machine with Qt 4.3.4: selecting various dates in the last year, I can > get reliably the right offset-from-GMT. > > i'm pretty sure the date-time dialog box isn't in its final > appearance, but it is serviceable now. > > cheers, > Nigel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Stellarium-pubdevel mailing list > Ste...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stellarium-pubdevel > |
From: Nigel K. <nig...@gm...> - 2008-03-17 12:55:05
|
I'll see what i can do this evening! cheers, nigel On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:42 AM, Fabien Chéreau <fab...@go...> wrote: > Hi Nigel, > Thank for the patch! It looks promisin. However could you please clean your > patch? 80% of it's content are just suppressing tabs and space... It is > important that patches contain the minimum modifications otherwise it takes > ages to check.. > Cheers, > Fabien > > > > > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 9:09 PM, Nigel Kerr <nig...@gm...> wrote: > > > > > > > > good folk, > > > > I just submitted > > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1915675&group_id=48857&atid=454375 > > , I would appreciate it if a committer could let me know when or if it > > can be applied. See the patch description for more gorey details. > > > > In particular, though, I'd note that > > > > 1. CTest now enabled via this patch: a test target is added, and all > > tests added are run. "tests" are just executables, that exit with > > non-zero on any failure. There is one test there now, a somewhat > > primitive test versus my date/time functions. This has been useful to > > me in getting things correct, and any sort of non-gui computation > > could probably benefit from such automated tests of normal and > > boundary conditions. (However: having just pressed the submit button, > > i realize the test i've got for whether Qt understands EST/EDT time > > won't work in any other timezone...argh...). > > > > 2. timezone detection works on the following principles: > > a. we don't care what the name of the local timezone is, just the GMT > offset > > b. we let Qt figure all that out, we rely on QDateTime's .toUTC() to > > provide the offset. > > c. (as a consequence of b) if Qt doesn't know details about the shift > > for a point in the past or future, we fall back to shift at the > > present. > > > > I've seen the code in question for #2 work on a mac and a windows xp > > machine with Qt 4.3.4: selecting various dates in the last year, I can > > get reliably the right offset-from-GMT. > > > > i'm pretty sure the date-time dialog box isn't in its final > > appearance, but it is serviceable now. > > > > cheers, > > Nigel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Stellarium-pubdevel mailing list > > Ste...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stellarium-pubdevel > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Stellarium-pubdevel mailing list > Ste...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stellarium-pubdevel > > |
From: F. C. <fab...@go...> - 2008-03-18 13:47:52
|
Hi Nigel, I comited your patch :) You should now start again to work from the SVN version. So the patch is good, there are however some minor problems: - when I run the soft, I get a lot of warning/debug print on the console. Could you avoid that? - for the new time widget it looks very promising, the validator is nice, you should also add some up/down arrows like in QDateTime widgets, but I guess it was already planned :) Thanks a lot! Fabien On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Nigel Kerr <nig...@gm...> wrote: > I'll see what i can do this evening! > > cheers, > nigel > > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:42 AM, Fabien Chéreau > <fab...@go...> wrote: > > Hi Nigel, > > Thank for the patch! It looks promisin. However could you please clean your > > patch? 80% of it's content are just suppressing tabs and space... It is > > important that patches contain the minimum modifications otherwise it takes > > ages to check.. > > Cheers, > > Fabien > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 9:09 PM, Nigel Kerr <nig...@gm...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > good folk, > > > > > > I just submitted > > > > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1915675&group_id=48857&atid=454375 > > > , I would appreciate it if a committer could let me know when or if it > > > can be applied. See the patch description for more gorey details. > > > > > > In particular, though, I'd note that > > > > > > 1. CTest now enabled via this patch: a test target is added, and all > > > tests added are run. "tests" are just executables, that exit with > > > non-zero on any failure. There is one test there now, a somewhat > > > primitive test versus my date/time functions. This has been useful to > > > me in getting things correct, and any sort of non-gui computation > > > could probably benefit from such automated tests of normal and > > > boundary conditions. (However: having just pressed the submit button, > > > i realize the test i've got for whether Qt understands EST/EDT time > > > won't work in any other timezone...argh...). > > > > > > 2. timezone detection works on the following principles: > > > a. we don't care what the name of the local timezone is, just the GMT > > offset > > > b. we let Qt figure all that out, we rely on QDateTime's .toUTC() to > > > provide the offset. > > > c. (as a consequence of b) if Qt doesn't know details about the shift > > > for a point in the past or future, we fall back to shift at the > > > present. > > > > > > I've seen the code in question for #2 work on a mac and a windows xp > > > machine with Qt 4.3.4: selecting various dates in the last year, I can > > > get reliably the right offset-from-GMT. > > > > > > i'm pretty sure the date-time dialog box isn't in its final > > > appearance, but it is serviceable now. > > > > > > cheers, > > > Nigel > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Stellarium-pubdevel mailing list > > > Ste...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stellarium-pubdevel > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Stellarium-pubdevel mailing list > > Ste...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stellarium-pubdevel > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Stellarium-pubdevel mailing list > Ste...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stellarium-pubdevel > |
From: Matthew G. <mat...@gm...> - 2008-03-18 14:32:49
|
I have build problems since the update - some missing files: src/stelutils/TextEntryDateTimeValidator.cpp src/stelutils/TextEntryDateTimeValidator.hpp src/tests/testdates.cpp On Tuesday 18 March 2008, Fabien Chéreau wrote: > Hi Nigel, I comited your patch :) You should now start again to work > from the SVN version. > So the patch is good, there are however some minor problems: > - when I run the soft, I get a lot of warning/debug print on the > console. Could you avoid that? > - for the new time widget it looks very promising, the validator is > nice, you should also add some up/down arrows like in QDateTime > widgets, but I guess it was already planned :) > Thanks a lot! > Fabien > |
From: F. C. <fab...@go...> - 2008-03-18 15:12:12
|
Added! Apologies. Fab On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Matthew Gates <mat...@gm...> wrote: > I have build problems since the update - some missing files: > > src/stelutils/TextEntryDateTimeValidator.cpp > src/stelutils/TextEntryDateTimeValidator.hpp > src/tests/testdates.cpp > > > > On Tuesday 18 March 2008, Fabien Chéreau wrote: > > Hi Nigel, I comited your patch :) You should now start again to work > > from the SVN version. > > So the patch is good, there are however some minor problems: > > - when I run the soft, I get a lot of warning/debug print on the > > console. Could you avoid that? > > - for the new time widget it looks very promising, the validator is > > nice, you should also add some up/down arrows like in QDateTime > > widgets, but I guess it was already planned :) > > Thanks a lot! > > Fabien > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Stellarium-pubdevel mailing list > Ste...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stellarium-pubdevel > |
From: David F. <dfo...@gm...> - 2008-03-19 01:57:26
|
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 6:47 AM, Fabien Chéreau <fab...@go...> wrote: > Hi Nigel, I comited your patch :) You should now start again to work > from the SVN version. I just svned up and built the new release. I get the time & date dialog box to come up, but if I make any changes in the date (basically all I can do is backspace) I get to a date in 4712 BC. This can't be right; we all know the Earth was created in 4004 BC. :) :) > So the patch is good, there are however some minor problems: > - when I run the soft, I get a lot of warning/debug print on the > console. Could you avoid that? > - for the new time widget it looks very promising, the validator is > nice, you should also add some up/down arrows like in QDateTime > widgets, but I guess it was already planned :) > Thanks a lot! > Fabien > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Nigel Kerr <nig...@gm...> wrote: > > I'll see what i can do this evening! > > > > cheers, > > nigel > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:42 AM, Fabien Chéreau > > <fab...@go...> wrote: > > > Hi Nigel, > > > Thank for the patch! It looks promisin. However could you please clean your > > > patch? 80% of it's content are just suppressing tabs and space... It is > > > important that patches contain the minimum modifications otherwise it takes > > > ages to check.. > > > Cheers, > > > Fabien > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 9:09 PM, Nigel Kerr <nig...@gm...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > good folk, > > > > > > > > I just submitted > > > > > > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1915675&group_id=48857&atid=454375 > > > > , I would appreciate it if a committer could let me know when or if it > > > > can be applied. See the patch description for more gorey details. > > > > > > > > In particular, though, I'd note that > > > > > > > > 1. CTest now enabled via this patch: a test target is added, and all > > > > tests added are run. "tests" are just executables, that exit with > > > > non-zero on any failure. There is one test there now, a somewhat > > > > primitive test versus my date/time functions. This has been useful to > > > > me in getting things correct, and any sort of non-gui computation > > > > could probably benefit from such automated tests of normal and > > > > boundary conditions. (However: having just pressed the submit button, > > > > i realize the test i've got for whether Qt understands EST/EDT time > > > > won't work in any other timezone...argh...). > > > > > > > > 2. timezone detection works on the following principles: > > > > a. we don't care what the name of the local timezone is, just the GMT > > > offset > > > > b. we let Qt figure all that out, we rely on QDateTime's .toUTC() to > > > > provide the offset. > > > > c. (as a consequence of b) if Qt doesn't know details about the shift > > > > for a point in the past or future, we fall back to shift at the > > > > present. > > > > > > > > I've seen the code in question for #2 work on a mac and a windows xp > > > > machine with Qt 4.3.4: selecting various dates in the last year, I can > > > > get reliably the right offset-from-GMT. > > > > > > > > i'm pretty sure the date-time dialog box isn't in its final > > > > appearance, but it is serviceable now. > > > > > > > > cheers, > > > > Nigel > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > > > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Stellarium-pubdevel mailing list > > > > Ste...@li... > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stellarium-pubdevel > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Stellarium-pubdevel mailing list > > > Ste...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stellarium-pubdevel > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Stellarium-pubdevel mailing list > > Ste...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stellarium-pubdevel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Stellarium-pubdevel mailing list > Ste...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stellarium-pubdevel > |
From: Nigel K. <nig...@gm...> - 2008-03-19 12:32:29
|
Hi David, Can you send along (maybe off list) your exact steps, and your platform? This has not been my experience so far of the new code, but i may well have missed something important. cheers, Nigel On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 9:57 PM, David Fox <dfo...@gm...> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 6:47 AM, Fabien Chéreau > > <fab...@go...> wrote: > > > Hi Nigel, I comited your patch :) You should now start again to work > > from the SVN version. > > I just svned up and built the new release. I get the time & date > dialog box to come up, but if I make any changes in the date > (basically all I can do is backspace) I get to a date in 4712 BC. > > This can't be right; we all know the Earth was created in 4004 BC. :) :) > > > > > So the patch is good, there are however some minor problems: > > - when I run the soft, I get a lot of warning/debug print on the > > console. Could you avoid that? > > - for the new time widget it looks very promising, the validator is > > nice, you should also add some up/down arrows like in QDateTime > > widgets, but I guess it was already planned :) > > Thanks a lot! > > Fabien > > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Nigel Kerr <nig...@gm...> wrote: > > > I'll see what i can do this evening! > > > > > > cheers, > > > nigel > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:42 AM, Fabien Chéreau > > > <fab...@go...> wrote: > > > > Hi Nigel, > > > > Thank for the patch! It looks promisin. However could you please clean your > > > > patch? 80% of it's content are just suppressing tabs and space... It is > > > > important that patches contain the minimum modifications otherwise it takes > > > > ages to check.. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Fabien > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 9:09 PM, Nigel Kerr <nig...@gm...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > good folk, > > > > > > > > > > I just submitted > > > > > > > > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1915675&group_id=48857&atid=454375 > > > > > , I would appreciate it if a committer could let me know when or if it > > > > > can be applied. See the patch description for more gorey details. > > > > > > > > > > In particular, though, I'd note that > > > > > > > > > > 1. CTest now enabled via this patch: a test target is added, and all > > > > > tests added are run. "tests" are just executables, that exit with > > > > > non-zero on any failure. There is one test there now, a somewhat > > > > > primitive test versus my date/time functions. This has been useful to > > > > > me in getting things correct, and any sort of non-gui computation > > > > > could probably benefit from such automated tests of normal and > > > > > boundary conditions. (However: having just pressed the submit button, > > > > > i realize the test i've got for whether Qt understands EST/EDT time > > > > > won't work in any other timezone...argh...). > > > > > > > > > > 2. timezone detection works on the following principles: > > > > > a. we don't care what the name of the local timezone is, just the GMT > > > > offset > > > > > b. we let Qt figure all that out, we rely on QDateTime's .toUTC() to > > > > > provide the offset. > > > > > c. (as a consequence of b) if Qt doesn't know details about the shift > > > > > for a point in the past or future, we fall back to shift at the > > > > > present. > > > > > > > > > > I've seen the code in question for #2 work on a mac and a windows xp > > > > > machine with Qt 4.3.4: selecting various dates in the last year, I can > > > > > get reliably the right offset-from-GMT. > > > > > > > > > > i'm pretty sure the date-time dialog box isn't in its final > > > > > appearance, but it is serviceable now. > > > > > > > > > > cheers, > > > > > Nigel > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > > > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > > > > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Stellarium-pubdevel mailing list > > > > > Ste...@li... > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stellarium-pubdevel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > > > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Stellarium-pubdevel mailing list > > > > Ste...@li... > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stellarium-pubdevel > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Stellarium-pubdevel mailing list > > > Ste...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stellarium-pubdevel > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Stellarium-pubdevel mailing list > > Ste...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stellarium-pubdevel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Stellarium-pubdevel mailing list > Ste...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stellarium-pubdevel > |
From: David F. <dfo...@gm...> - 2008-03-19 15:22:17
|
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 5:32 AM, Nigel Kerr <nig...@gm...> wrote: > Can you send along (maybe off list) your exact steps, and your > platform? This has not been my experience so far of the new code, > but i may well have missed something important. OK, I played with it some more. I launched stellarium, then opened up the date time window using the clock icon on the left hand side. Then I got a dialog box with the current date and time, and an oddly placed "explain" about a third of the way down in the popup box. If I just backspace over the seconds or try and highlight the date / time string, I get a time string -4712-01-01 12:00:00 on the main stellarium status bar, at the bottom of the screen. On the other hand, if I use left/right arrow keys, I can change the date and it changes the display to reflect the desired date. Platform - debian lenny, up to date. > Nigel |
From: Nigel K. <nig...@gm...> - 2008-03-19 16:23:23
|
Hi David, I think i see what you've found: if you backspace over some *year* digits, everything's peaches: three, two, and one digits for a year is still valid. backspacing over seconds, minutes, hours, days, months, the Qt::Intermediate flag coming back from my QValidator either isn't coming, or a textEdited signal is getting sent anyways. i need to see if i can keep intermediate steps of editing from propagating, they seem to be. this should be straight-forward. thanks, Nigel On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:22 AM, David Fox <dfo...@gm...> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 5:32 AM, Nigel Kerr <nig...@gm...> wrote: > > > Can you send along (maybe off list) your exact steps, and your > > platform? This has not been my experience so far of the new code, > > but i may well have missed something important. > > OK, I played with it some more. > > I launched stellarium, then opened up the date time window using the > clock icon on the left hand side. Then I got a dialog box with the > current date and time, and an oddly placed "explain" about a third of > the way down in the popup box. > > If I just backspace over the seconds or try and highlight the date / > time string, I get a time string -4712-01-01 12:00:00 on the main > stellarium status bar, at the bottom of the screen. > > On the other hand, if I use left/right arrow keys, I can change the > date and it changes the display to reflect the desired date. > > Platform - debian lenny, up to date. > > > > > Nigel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Stellarium-pubdevel mailing list > Ste...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stellarium-pubdevel > |
From: Rob S. <ro...@di...> - 2008-03-19 16:42:22
|
A quick test and the daylight savings changes over time seem to be working OK for my timezone. I kept wanting to click on the date display in the lower toolbar to change the date. Could that pop up the date window for usability? Rob On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 12:23 -0400, Nigel Kerr wrote: > Hi David, > > I think i see what you've found: > > if you backspace over some *year* digits, everything's peaches: three, > two, and one digits for a year is still valid. > > backspacing over seconds, minutes, hours, days, months, the > Qt::Intermediate flag coming back from my QValidator either isn't > coming, or a textEdited signal is getting sent anyways. i need to see > if i can keep intermediate steps of editing from propagating, they > seem to be. this should be straight-forward. > > thanks, > Nigel > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:22 AM, David Fox <dfo...@gm...> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 5:32 AM, Nigel Kerr <nig...@gm...> wrote: > > > > > Can you send along (maybe off list) your exact steps, and your > > > platform? This has not been my experience so far of the new code, > > > but i may well have missed something important. > > > > OK, I played with it some more. > > > > I launched stellarium, then opened up the date time window using the > > clock icon on the left hand side. Then I got a dialog box with the > > current date and time, and an oddly placed "explain" about a third of > > the way down in the popup box. > > > > If I just backspace over the seconds or try and highlight the date / > > time string, I get a time string -4712-01-01 12:00:00 on the main > > stellarium status bar, at the bottom of the screen. > > > > On the other hand, if I use left/right arrow keys, I can change the > > date and it changes the display to reflect the desired date. > > > > Platform - debian lenny, up to date. > > > > > > > > > Nigel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Stellarium-pubdevel mailing list > > Ste...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stellarium-pubdevel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Stellarium-pubdevel mailing list > Ste...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stellarium-pubdevel -- Digitalis Education Solutions, Inc. tel 360.616.8915 P.O. Box 2976 fax 360.616.8917 Bremerton, WA 98310 http://digitaliseducation.com |