From: Bernd M. <ma...@ce...> - 2004-03-01 20:34:42
|
Hi to all! I've recently installed new stable version 1.5.0 as announced on the SM h= ome page. The previous installed is 1.4.2 with full locale support works fine. Now I have problems with language support especially for de_DE. I followed the instructions in locale/README.locales As first I missed the xx_XX-{sm-version}-{release-date}.tar.* files for = the stable 1.5.0 version. So I used CVS to checkout the locale tree from today with and without the= 'rel-1_5_0-20040222' tag. In both cases I used the 'compilelocales' and 'compilepo' scripts to comp= ile the languages. The german copies of squirrelmail.mo and squirrelmail.po are placed in locale= /de_DE/LC_MESSAGES. But no translation happened with neither the latest nor the 'rel-1_5_0-20= 040222' version. - Are the versions of SM 1.5.0 and CVS version of the locales incompatibl= e? - Are there locale for SM 1.5.0 somewhere? Could give me anyone some hints or has experience with the de_DE locale? Many thanks in advance. --=20 with kind regards |
From: Bernd M. <ma...@ce...> - 2004-03-01 21:24:21
|
Jay Lee schrub: > Would somebody *please* change the frontpage to clairfy that 1.5 is a > devel release?! It is not clear from the front page since it talks abo= ut > bugfixes, etc. A simple change of the title to 1.5.0 Beta would do it.= I > understand that Squirrelmail follows the Linux Kernel even/odd version > numbering but being precise would save on these types of questions... > > Jay Hi Jay! This clarifies the situation. Thanks. --=20 with kind regards |
From: Jonathan A. <jo...@sq...> - 2004-03-03 05:10:28
|
Hello Bernd, On Monday, March 01, 2004, Bernd Matthes wrote... >> Would somebody *please* change the frontpage to clairfy that 1.5 is >> a devel release?! It is not clear from the front page since it >> talks about bugfixes, etc. > This clarifies the situation. Hrm, unless somebody changed the title, I thought it was pretty clear, SM-DEVEL: SquirrelMail 1.5.0 released SM-DEVEL? DEVEL is often abbreviation of DEVELOPMENT. Clicking on the DOWNLOADS page, shows the headers as STABLE is 1.4.2, and DEVEL which is 1.5.0... what bit is not clear? -- Jonathan Angliss (jo...@sq...) |
From: Fredrik J. <sqm...@fi...> - 2004-03-03 10:46:26
|
>>> Would somebody *please* change the frontpage to clairfy that 1.5 is >>> a devel release?! It is not clear from the front page since it >>> talks about bugfixes, etc. > >> This clarifies the situation. > > Hrm, unless somebody changed the title, I thought it was pretty clear, > > SM-DEVEL: SquirrelMail 1.5.0 released > > SM-DEVEL? DEVEL is often abbreviation of DEVELOPMENT. Clicking on the > DOWNLOADS page, shows the headers as STABLE is 1.4.2, and DEVEL which > is 1.5.0... what bit is not clear? Here's my contriburiton to the discussion. It's not intended as a flame. The announcement on the SquirrelMail homepage is: SM-DEVEL: SquirrelMail 1.5.0 released Feb 01, 2004 by Erin Schnabel The Development Team has released version 1.5.0. Included in this release is the integration of the DMN plugin, some interface tweaks, and many bugfixes. Enjoy. I guess some people interpret SM-DEVEL as SquirrelMail Development Team and not SquirrelMail Development Version. You can never be clear enough for everyone to understand what you're meaning. Sincerly, Fredrik. PS. I agree that the information at the download page is more obvious than the homepage. F. |
From: Erin S. <ebu...@sq...> - 2004-03-04 06:18:00
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Fredrik Jervfors said: >>>> Would somebody *please* change the frontpage to clairfy that 1.5 is >>>> a devel release?! It is not clear from the front page since it >>>> talks about bugfixes, etc. >> >>> This clarifies the situation. >> > Here's my contriburiton to the discussion. It's not intended as a flame. > > The announcement on the SquirrelMail homepage is: > > SM-DEVEL: SquirrelMail 1.5.0 released > Feb 01, 2004 by Erin Schnabel > The Development Team has released version 1.5.0. Included in this > release is the integration of the DMN plugin, some interface tweaks, and > many bugfixes. Enjoy. > > I guess some people interpret SM-DEVEL as SquirrelMail Development Team > and not SquirrelMail Development Version. > > You can never be clear enough for everyone to understand what you're > meaning. SM-DEVEL is also the prefix used for development list messages, and generally indicates development work (on these lists, on our pages, etc). Next time, I'll confine announcement of dev releases to the dev list, since it seems to confuse everyone else. *sigh* Erin (ebullient) - -- 'Waste of a good apple.' - Samwise Gamgee ICQ: 38670353 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFARsbXj4SATWufnkIRAhCeAJ4rd/E63unKj5D0Izf/XNHzFoE9pgCcC0Po vNPjAqJNFA5kR/bJTVvkEDI= =5H/X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: Tomas K. <to...@us...> - 2004-03-02 06:06:08
|
> - Are the versions of SM 1.5.0 and CVS version of the locales > incompatible? There is one string difference between squirrelmail 1.5.0 and locales HEAD. It should not affect other strings. > - Are there locale for SM 1.5.0 somewhere? 1. can you show layout of your squirrelmail install? where have you placed de_DE translations? have you restarted webserver after installing translations? 2. http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=311&package_id=110388 -- Tomas |
From: Bernd M. <ma...@ce...> - 2004-03-02 19:24:18
|
Tomas Kuliavas schrub: >> - Are the versions of SM 1.5.0 and CVS version of the locales >> incompatible? > > There is one string difference between squirrelmail 1.5.0 and locales > HEAD. It should not affect other strings. > >> - Are there locale for SM 1.5.0 somewhere? > > 1. can you show layout of your squirrelmail install? > where have you placed de_DE translations? > have you restarted webserver after installing translations? > > 2. > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=3D311&package_id=3D= 110388 > Hi Tomas! Thanks for Your tips and the link! A restart of the webserver was the solution. with kind regards Bernd --=20 telnet is completely glutted. It speaks mail, news, HTTP an so on. The U= NIX philosophy is that *one* tool is used for *one* purpose. telnet is suitable for Windows= people. |
From: Jonathan A. <jo...@sq...> - 2004-03-03 05:06:51
|
Hello Bernd, On Monday, March 01, 2004, Bernd Matthes wrote... > I've recently installed new stable version 1.5.0 as announced on the > SM home page. The previous installed is 1.4.2 with full locale > support works fine. While it is nice to see people trying cutting edge, it should be noted that 1.5.0 is a development release. Just an FYI in the event you didn't know ;) -- Jonathan Angliss (jo...@sq...) |