You can subscribe to this list here.
1999 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(20) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2000 |
Jan
(96) |
Feb
(124) |
Mar
(196) |
Apr
(169) |
May
(63) |
Jun
(230) |
Jul
(182) |
Aug
(247) |
Sep
(143) |
Oct
(153) |
Nov
(156) |
Dec
(162) |
2001 |
Jan
(399) |
Feb
(206) |
Mar
(50) |
Apr
(115) |
May
(111) |
Jun
(139) |
Jul
(153) |
Aug
(149) |
Sep
(225) |
Oct
(263) |
Nov
(90) |
Dec
(344) |
2002 |
Jan
(475) |
Feb
(303) |
Mar
(278) |
Apr
(339) |
May
(188) |
Jun
(95) |
Jul
(145) |
Aug
(277) |
Sep
(277) |
Oct
(306) |
Nov
(190) |
Dec
(153) |
2003 |
Jan
(179) |
Feb
(213) |
Mar
(126) |
Apr
(201) |
May
(85) |
Jun
(207) |
Jul
(205) |
Aug
(175) |
Sep
(226) |
Oct
(176) |
Nov
(79) |
Dec
(115) |
2004 |
Jan
(86) |
Feb
(112) |
Mar
(129) |
Apr
(185) |
May
(153) |
Jun
(157) |
Jul
(89) |
Aug
(182) |
Sep
(98) |
Oct
(105) |
Nov
(115) |
Dec
(90) |
2005 |
Jan
(61) |
Feb
(154) |
Mar
(239) |
Apr
(265) |
May
(80) |
Jun
(96) |
Jul
(118) |
Aug
(129) |
Sep
(74) |
Oct
(81) |
Nov
(261) |
Dec
(121) |
2006 |
Jan
(137) |
Feb
(204) |
Mar
(99) |
Apr
(45) |
May
(68) |
Jun
(51) |
Jul
(109) |
Aug
(56) |
Sep
(146) |
Oct
(229) |
Nov
(93) |
Dec
(47) |
2007 |
Jan
(127) |
Feb
(102) |
Mar
(89) |
Apr
(60) |
May
(41) |
Jun
(56) |
Jul
(139) |
Aug
(51) |
Sep
(51) |
Oct
(52) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(57) |
2008 |
Jan
(91) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(80) |
Apr
(57) |
May
(69) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(33) |
Aug
(29) |
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(18) |
2009 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(29) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(24) |
Sep
(27) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(14) |
Dec
(34) |
2010 |
Jan
(31) |
Feb
(34) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
(16) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(17) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(2) |
2011 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
(14) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(10) |
2012 |
Jan
(18) |
Feb
(27) |
Mar
(11) |
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(2) |
2013 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(8) |
2014 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2015 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(2) |
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(34) |
2017 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(4) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(6) |
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(11) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
2023 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
From: Solid I. <sol...@gm...> - 2017-03-22 03:33:43
|
Hi Paul, I suspected that my email would be received in a negative spirit. That’s really not how it was intended. I haven’t taken any serious look into SquirrelMail or its templating capabilities. But I don’t really think “templating” is what the problem is. Its more fundamental than that. I'm not looking for a cute new "skin". I can't be the only one who sees a significant functionally disparity between SquirrelMail and Gmail or Outlook.com? I suspect the response will be “*then use Gmail if I love it so much*” but that’s not really the point is it? The question I am asking is does SM *intend* to compete in this space? If not then fine. But if so then what’s it doing to address the glaring gap? This was intended as constructive critique. Or we can just put our heads in the sand and pretend everything is OK and that we can’t imagine why anyone wouldn’t want to use anything other than Alpine anyway (oh, and BTW, I *do* use Alpine too). Best regards, Solid Iron On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 2:28 AM, Paul Lesniewski <pa...@sq...> wrote: > > You're welcome to use your vast experience to contribute a skin for > SquirrelMail 1.5.2 where a templating layer was added. > > -- > Paul Lesniewski > SquirrelMail Team > Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail! > http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php > > |
From: Jessie H. <squ...@je...> - 2017-03-20 13:55:07
|
Hi all, When sorting mails in squirrelmail I noticed that when you sort on threads squirrelmail sorts the emails based on the intial mail and not the latest child. So if I would receive an email on an old thread it will not appear on my first page at the top but somewhere on a old page. Is there something I am doing wrong with the sorting? I have enabled sorting on my IMAP server. I am running on a rasberry pi where I use postfix Dovecot version 2.2.13 squirrelmail 1.4.23 [SVN] Thank for any help. Regards, Jessie Hernandez |
From: Paul L. <pa...@sq...> - 2017-02-06 07:28:24
|
On 2017年02月02日 19:52, Solid Iron wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I will prefix this by saying that this is my first time posting to this > list and that I have never contributed to SquirrelMail development so > feel free to ignore my question. > > However I own a software development firm. We write mostly web-based > business software on .NET framework with an MS-SQL backend. We have been > doing this since the days of “classic” ASP in the late 1990’s. So while > I haven’t contributed specifically to SquirrelMail I do nevertheless > have a pretty good idea of what it takes to develop a robust modern > web-based application that people use every day. I also have a good > grasp of what users expect when it comes to web-based applications. > Nevertheless, as I said before, feel free to ignore my question. > > Has the issue of the _*seriously dated*_ user experience of SquirrelMail > got anyone’s attention? With the explosion of web-based email apps > (Gmail, Outlook.com, Microsoft Exchange, RoundCube, etc) users expect a > radically different experience then what they are getting from > SquirrelMail. Any IT administrator deploying SquirrelMail today is > likely to be perceived by their user base as having deployed an archaic > solution. > > Web-based apps in general (Office 365, Google Docs, Facebook, etc) are > pushing the limits of what’s possible and redefining what users expect. > Let’s ask the hard question: is SquirrelMail even close?!?? Are there > any plans to get it there? > > It seems to me (if the screenshots on the squirrelmail.org > <http://squirrelmail.org> website are any indication) that all serious > development on SquirrelMail stalled in 2002 or thereabouts. > > Sorry if this sounds harsh... Today if I was looking for an open source > web-based IMAP client I would be looking at RoundCube – no question. > SquirrelMail was the pioneer. Why aren’t we there? You're welcome to use your vast experience to contribute a skin for SquirrelMail 1.5.2 where a templating layer was added. -- Paul Lesniewski SquirrelMail Team Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail! http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php |
From: Solid I. <sol...@gm...> - 2017-02-03 03:52:10
|
Hi everyone, I will prefix this by saying that this is my first time posting to this list and that I have never contributed to SquirrelMail development so feel free to ignore my question. However I own a software development firm. We write mostly web-based business software on .NET framework with an MS-SQL backend. We have been doing this since the days of “classic” ASP in the late 1990’s. So while I haven’t contributed specifically to SquirrelMail I do nevertheless have a pretty good idea of what it takes to develop a robust modern web-based application that people use every day. I also have a good grasp of what users expect when it comes to web-based applications. Nevertheless, as I said before, feel free to ignore my question. Has the issue of the *seriously dated* user experience of SquirrelMail got anyone’s attention? With the explosion of web-based email apps (Gmail, Outlook.com, Microsoft Exchange, RoundCube, etc) users expect a radically different experience then what they are getting from SquirrelMail. Any IT administrator deploying SquirrelMail today is likely to be perceived by their user base as having deployed an archaic solution. Web-based apps in general (Office 365, Google Docs, Facebook, etc) are pushing the limits of what’s possible and redefining what users expect. Let’s ask the hard question: is SquirrelMail even close?!?? Are there any plans to get it there? It seems to me (if the screenshots on the squirrelmail.org website are any indication) that all serious development on SquirrelMail stalled in 2002 or thereabouts. Sorry if this sounds harsh... Today if I was looking for an open source web-based IMAP client I would be looking at RoundCube – no question. SquirrelMail was the pioneer. Why aren’t we there? Best, Solid Iron On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 9:10 PM, Kevin Buckley <Kev...@ec...> wrote: > OS NetBSD 7.0_STABLE > Software Stack PkgSrc > SquirrelMail 1.4.23pre14605 > Apache 2 Apache/2.2.31 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.31 OpenSSL/1.0.1u DAV/2 > PHP/7.0.13 > PHP 7.0.135.6.28-1 > > > Before I start, a bit of info on the SquirrelMail version, because I > was told that we are reasonably up-to-date, in that the PkgSrc commit > says: > > ---------------------------- > revision 1.131 > date: 2016-11-18 04:10:07 +1300; author: taca; state: Exp; lines: +2 > -3; commitid: TckPzUpbAFssFuuz; > Update squirrelmail to 1.4.23pre14605, latest snapshot. > PHP 7.0 support should be improved, too. > > - Added new "smtp_helo_override" hook; allows plugins to override > the HELO host sent to the SMTP server when sending messages > - Added STARTTLS support for both IMAP and SMTP connections > - Added PDO support for database connections, so no external > database module needs to be installed > ---------------------------- > > furthermore, I also note that this issue echoes that described in > this (Dec 2016) devel list posting > > - https://sourceforge.net/p/squirrelmail/mailman/message/35527151/ > > except that ours > > 1) is only using a secure (https) connection > 2) exhibits the "blank page" but DOESN'T send a message. > 3) is using PHP7, not the PHP5. > > but here we go with the actual issue. > > Our School's webservers updated to PHP7 over the weekend and one of the > issues in the wake of that has been that SquirrelMail works to a degree > (we're a Uni, but no pun intended) but no longer seems to be able to > send out mail, either when doing a "Compose" or a reply to. > > The webserver logs tell us that, following a click on the "Send" button > we're falling foul of these four routines > > squirrelmail/class/html.class.php > squirrelmail/class/mime/Disposition.class.php > squirrelmail/class/mime/Language.class.php > squirrelmail/class/mime/ContentType.class.php > > which give error (not warning) messages akin to > > PHP Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be > constructors in a future version of PHP; > > although that might not be the whole story as some parts of SquirrelMail > clearly still work. > > I tried adding in "proper" __constructor functions, in the manner of the > fix described here > > - https://cweiske.de/tagebuch/php4-constructors-php7.htm > > to those four files, however that just moves the same issue down into > (or possibly across) the SquirrelMail stack, and we see some other > webserver error logs, three indicating similar "deprecated constructor" > stuff from different fucntions: > > squirrelmail/functions/addressbook.php > squirrelmail/functions/abook_local_file.php > squirrelmail/functions/abook_ldap_server.php > > however, two more exhibit different errors > > PHP Deprecated: Non-static method Message::parseStructure() should not > be called statically in > > squirrelmail/functions/mime.php on line 36, > squirrelmail/class/mime/Message.class.php on line 296, > > both with the same referrer > > referer: > https://our.host/squirrelmail/src/right_main.php?PG_SHOWALL= > 0&sort=0&startMessage=1&mailbox=INBOX > > > Reading around the interweb thing, especially this posting in the > squirrelmail-devel list > > - https://sourceforge.net/p/squirrelmail/mailman/message/35457393/ > > suggests that there's a snapshot version out there in which all this may > have been > fixed ? > > What I'd like to know is whether there is an identifiable set of patches > that I could use, so to to patch the PkgSrc version of SquirrelMail, rather > than go straight to a /newer/the most recent/ snapshot version that will > have extra (or even reduced) functionality, which the PkgSrc folk clearly > decided wasn't the way forwards for them. > > I suppose what I am asking is, did you do the PHP7 updates in an SVN branch > that I could take the top off, rather than taking the most recent branch > and > extracting out only the "solution" to the "deprecated" errors ? > > I also suppose that the errors we're seeing could be something else > altogether! > > Either way, and it pretty much covers most "ways", any insight would be > useful, > > Kevin Buckley > eScience Consultant > School of Engineering and Computer Science > Victoria University of Wellington > New Zealand > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > ----- > squirrelmail-devel mailing list > Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines > List address: squ...@li... > List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.devel > List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-devel > |
From: Paul L. <pa...@sq...> - 2017-01-08 02:21:24
|
On 12/18/16, chandrakant <cha...@gm...> wrote: > I am also facing similar problem with squirrelmail version 1.4.22, PHP > version 5.4.16, httpd version Apache/2.4.6 (CentOS), CentOS Linux release > 7.2.1511 (Core) > > For some messages after clicking on forward button while composing mail > entire msg becomes blank. What could be the solution? Upgrade. -- Paul Lesniewski SquirrelMail Team Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail! http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php |
From: chandrakant <cha...@gm...> - 2016-12-19 08:07:41
|
I am also facing similar problem with squirrelmail version 1.4.22, PHP version 5.4.16, httpd version Apache/2.4.6 (CentOS), CentOS Linux release 7.2.1511 (Core) For some messages after clicking on forward button while composing mail entire msg becomes blank. What could be the solution? -- View this message in context: http://squirrelmail.5843.n7.nabble.com/Squirrelmail-returns-blank-page-after-send-PHP-7-Warning-contains-logs-tp26438p26483.html Sent from the squirrelmail-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
From: oonet <squ...@oo...> - 2016-12-17 11:05:50
|
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:14 PM, oonet <squirrelmail-ok@> wrote: > After the POST to compose.php, does it successfully 302 redirect back to > right_main.php? With http, yes. With https, no. > If not, then it's dying somewhere in there. Yes. -- View this message in context: http://squirrelmail.5843.n7.nabble.com/Squirrelmail-returns-blank-page-after-send-tp26436p26479.html Sent from the squirrelmail-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
From: Rolan Y. <ro...@om...> - 2016-12-17 06:07:39
|
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:14 PM, oonet <squ...@oo...> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 7:25 PM, oonet <squirrelmail-ok@> wrote: > > > Start inserting > > > > print 'Ok, I made it to here!'; exit; > > > > throughout compose.php then reloading https to locate where it dies. > > It doesn't appear to be dying. Exits normally. Returns the index page in > http and a blank page in https. > > > After the POST to compose.php, does it successfully 302 redirect back to right_main.php? If not, then it's dying somewhere in there. |
From: oonet <squ...@oo...> - 2016-12-17 04:46:48
|
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 7:25 PM, oonet <squirrelmail-ok@> wrote: > Start inserting > > print 'Ok, I made it to here!'; exit; > > throughout compose.php then reloading https to locate where it dies. It doesn't appear to be dying. Exits normally. Returns the index page in http and a blank page in https. -- View this message in context: http://squirrelmail.5843.n7.nabble.com/Squirrelmail-returns-blank-page-after-send-tp26436p26475.html Sent from the squirrelmail-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
From: Rolan Y. <ro...@om...> - 2016-12-17 04:30:39
|
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 7:25 PM, oonet <squ...@oo...> wrote: > > > Perfectly normal. The frame contents are what are not loading then. > > Agreed. > > > Still, the client side will tell you little to nothing compared to > > simply looking in your logs. > > The logs appear as expected. Sending an email in http and https look > identical except for (successful) entries relating to ssl. They both show a > hit to compose.php followed by a disconnect. There were no errors logged > for > either apache or php. > > According to the logs, squirrelmail is behaving normally returning the > index > page in http and a blank page in https. > Start inserting print 'Ok, I made it to here!'; exit; throughout compose.php then reloading https to locate where it dies. :) ~Rolan |
From: Paul L. <pa...@sq...> - 2016-12-17 03:45:19
|
On 2016年12月16日 16:25, oonet wrote: > >> Perfectly normal. The frame contents are what are not loading then. > > Agreed. > >> Still, the client side will tell you little to nothing compared to >> simply looking in your logs. > > The logs appear as expected. Sending an email in http and https look > identical except for (successful) entries relating to ssl. They both show a > hit to compose.php followed by a disconnect. There were no errors logged for > either apache or php. Increase logging verbosity. SHOW configuration settings, logs, information you think could assist anyone who feels motivated to help you debug your system. Sorry, but my crystal ball is broken. > According to the logs, squirrelmail is behaving normally returning the index > page in http and a blank page in https. No such thing as a blank page in SquirrelMail's world. Blank means there is an error in the PHP code or your browser/web server can't handle the redirect. Watch browser connection and responses as well. -- Paul Lesniewski SquirrelMail Team Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail! http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php |
From: oonet <squ...@oo...> - 2016-12-17 01:57:24
|
> Perfectly normal. The frame contents are what are not loading then. Agreed. > Still, the client side will tell you little to nothing compared to > simply looking in your logs. The logs appear as expected. Sending an email in http and https look identical except for (successful) entries relating to ssl. They both show a hit to compose.php followed by a disconnect. There were no errors logged for either apache or php. According to the logs, squirrelmail is behaving normally returning the index page in http and a blank page in https. -- View this message in context: http://squirrelmail.5843.n7.nabble.com/Squirrelmail-returns-blank-page-after-send-tp26436p26472.html Sent from the squirrelmail-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
From: Paul L. <pa...@sq...> - 2016-12-16 11:26:54
|
>>>> Yes, I mean the login page times out. The correct password is >>>> entered, and then Chrome spins, until it times out. You never get >>>> to the inbox. >>>> >>>> It is only 1 user account that is affected, other accounts are >>>> working fine. I think it's trying to display too many emails on the >>>> first page; so if I can reset all the Squirrel mail settings for >>>> this account back to the default settings, it will likely resolve >>>> the issue. How can I do that from the command line? >>> >>> Have the user clean out the inbox by connecting to the account with an >>> external POP3 client like Thunderbird. If the user wishes to retain the >>> ham emails in the account, use IMAP, but delete the spam. >> >> As implied by Rolan, the user's webmail preferences may not be the fix >> you're looking for. > > I took Rolans' advice (thanks Rolan!), there's about 6K emails in the > users inbox using an IMAP desktop client (Outlook). I've had more than > that in my own inbox, and Squirrelmail has always worked fine for me. > That leads me to further believe it's simply a setting in his > Squirrelmail preferences. He's deleting email, but still would be good > to know if those Squirrelmail settings can be changed from the command line. I gave you a whole list of things to consider (including prefs info). You should consider them. -- Paul Lesniewski SquirrelMail Team Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail! http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php |
From: Paul L. <pa...@sq...> - 2016-12-16 11:21:25
|
On 2016年12月15日 20:58, oonet wrote: > By the way, here's the source of the "blank" page being returned (by https, > http is fine): > > <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Frameset//EN"> > <html><head> > <meta name="robots" content="noindex,nofollow"> > <title>SquirrelMail 1.4.22</title> > </head><frameset cols="200, *" id="fs1"> > <frame src="left_main.php" name="left" frameborder="1"> > <frame src="right_main.php" name="right" frameborder="1"> > </frameset> > </html> Perfectly normal. The frame contents are what are not loading then. Still, the client side will tell you little to nothing compared to simply looking in your logs. -- Paul Lesniewski SquirrelMail Team Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail! http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php |
From: Paul L. <pa...@sq...> - 2016-12-16 11:19:58
|
On 2016年12月10日 11:25, oonet wrote: > > On 2016年12月05日 22:55, oonet wrote: > >> The point is we can't debug your setup for you, especially without any > information whatsoever. > > Understood. I'll debug the setup. > >> HTTPS works for most everyone, so it's > something peculiar to your environment. > > Https is working here too - though not the same as http. Are you saying that > using https on other systems, compose-send returns the index and not a blank > page? Of course. > If so, I'm puzzled because there are no errors. But I'm sure there's an > explanation. There ARE errors, but you have not found them. I already sent you a link explaining where to find any error messages. > I have seen reference to a squirrelmail extension for apache, though I have > not installed it. Just copied the squirrelmail directory to apache and > linked to it. Only the bare minimum of extensions are enabled. Maybe there's > one that squirrelmail tries to make use of when accessed by https? There's no such thing. > Or maybe the problem is limited to php5.6? No, chances are very good it's quite specific to how you built and configured your web server. -- Paul Lesniewski SquirrelMail Team Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail! http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php |
From: oonet <squ...@oo...> - 2016-12-16 06:30:11
|
By the way, here's the source of the "blank" page being returned (by https, http is fine): <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Frameset//EN"> <html><head> <meta name="robots" content="noindex,nofollow"> <title>SquirrelMail 1.4.22</title> </head><frameset cols="200, *" id="fs1"> <frame src="left_main.php" name="left" frameborder="1"> <frame src="right_main.php" name="right" frameborder="1"> </frameset> </html> -- View this message in context: http://squirrelmail.5843.n7.nabble.com/Squirrelmail-returns-blank-page-after-send-tp26436p26464.html Sent from the squirrelmail-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
From: K. C. C. <ke...@kc...> - 2016-12-15 15:36:43
|
I'll take a look at the instructions, I didn't know I needed to do anything else but reply to a response on this list. I took Rolans' advice (thanks Rolan!), there's about 6K emails in the users inbox using an IMAP desktop client (Outlook). I've had more than that in my own inbox, and Squirrelmail has always worked fine for me. That leads me to further believe it's simply a setting in his Squirrelmail preferences. He's deleting email, but still would be good to know if those Squirrelmail settings can be changed from the command line. -Kevin C. Sent from my HTC One M9 on Sprint. ----- Reply message ----- From: "Paul Lesniewski" <pa...@sq...> To: "Squirrelmail Developers Mailing List" <squ...@li...> Subject: [SM-DEVEL] SquirrelMail page will not load Date: Thu, Dec 15, 2016 5:02 AM Kevin, please do not top post. Please READ the mailing list posting guidelines as requested when you subscribed to this list. On 2016年12月13日 22:20, Rolan Yang wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Kevin C. Connell > <ke...@kc... <mailto:ke...@kc...>> wrote: > > Hi, > > Yes, I mean the login page times out. The correct password is > entered, and then Chrome spins, until it times out. You never get > to the inbox. > > It is only 1 user account that is affected, other accounts are > working fine. I think it's trying to display too many emails on the > first page; so if I can reset all the Squirrel mail settings for > this account back to the default settings, it will likely resolve > the issue. How can I do that from the command line? > > > -Kevin C. > > Sent from my HTC One M9 on Sprint. > > > > Have the user clean out the inbox by connecting to the account with an > external POP3 client like Thunderbird. If the user wishes to retain the > ham emails in the account, use IMAP, but delete the spam. As implied by Rolan, the user's webmail preferences may not be the fix you're looking for. -- Paul Lesniewski SquirrelMail Team Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail! http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ----- squirrelmail-devel mailing list Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines List address: squ...@li... List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.devel List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-devel |
From: Paul L. <pa...@sq...> - 2016-12-15 13:02:15
|
Kevin, please do not top post. Please READ the mailing list posting guidelines as requested when you subscribed to this list. On 2016年12月13日 22:20, Rolan Yang wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Kevin C. Connell > <ke...@kc... <mailto:ke...@kc...>> wrote: > > Hi, > > Yes, I mean the login page times out. The correct password is > entered, and then Chrome spins, until it times out. You never get > to the inbox. > > It is only 1 user account that is affected, other accounts are > working fine. I think it's trying to display too many emails on the > first page; so if I can reset all the Squirrel mail settings for > this account back to the default settings, it will likely resolve > the issue. How can I do that from the command line? > > > -Kevin C. > > Sent from my HTC One M9 on Sprint. > > > > Have the user clean out the inbox by connecting to the account with an > external POP3 client like Thunderbird. If the user wishes to retain the > ham emails in the account, use IMAP, but delete the spam. As implied by Rolan, the user's webmail preferences may not be the fix you're looking for. -- Paul Lesniewski SquirrelMail Team Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail! http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php |
From: Rolan Y. <ro...@om...> - 2016-12-14 06:20:45
|
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Kevin C. Connell <ke...@kc...> wrote: > Hi, > > Yes, I mean the login page times out. The correct password is entered, > and then Chrome spins, until it times out. You never get to the inbox. > > It is only 1 user account that is affected, other accounts are working > fine. I think it's trying to display too many emails on the first page; so > if I can reset all the Squirrel mail settings for this account back to the > default settings, it will likely resolve the issue. How can I do that from > the command line? > > > -Kevin C. > > Sent from my HTC One M9 on Sprint. > > Have the user clean out the inbox by connecting to the account with an external POP3 client like Thunderbird. If the user wishes to retain the ham emails in the account, use IMAP, but delete the spam. ~Rolan |
From: K. C. C. <ke...@kc...> - 2016-12-14 05:18:34
|
Hi, Yes, I mean the login page times out. The correct password is entered, and then Chrome spins, until it times out. You never get to the inbox. It is only 1 user account that is affected, other accounts are working fine. I think it's trying to display too many emails on the first page; so if I can reset all the Squirrel mail settings for this account back to the default settings, it will likely resolve the issue. How can I do that from the command line? -Kevin C. Sent from my HTC One M9 on Sprint. ----- Reply message ----- From: "Paul Lesniewski" <pa...@sq...> To: "Squirrelmail Developers Mailing List" <squ...@li...> Subject: [SM-DEVEL] SquirrelMail page will not load Date: Sat, Dec 10, 2016 2:22 AM On 2016年12月09日 10:39, Kevin C. Connell wrote: > Greetings, > > We are running SquirrelMail 1.4.22, with Exim on CentOS. I have one email > account that is functional inbound/outbound using IMAP, but the problem > is, the SquirrelMail web page will not load, it times out. Please be specific with what "the SquirrelMail page" means. There are many "pages" in SquirrelMail. Do you mean that the login times out? Please refer to your server logs to see why. The mailing list archives have pointers of where to find your logs. If your IMAP server is timing out, you should see something in your logs. If SquirrelMail itself is timing out, watch the web server log for helpful information. You need to look at how big the user's INBOX is, your PHP memory limit and max execution time settings, etc. Make sure you are not using some kind of PHP-side modules that do things to all the user's INBOX messages, such as the "filters" plugin. And check the config file for what the $allow_thread_sort and $allow_server_sort settings are. Etc... > 2 things happened with this account prior to the web page not loading: > > 1) The account was hacked and was getting bombarded with spam email. An account doesn't have to be hacked to get bombarded with spam. In such a case, the user prefs will not have changed and your problem may simply be that you need to deal with an extremely large INBOX. > 2) Some SPAM and display settings were changed by the user. I'm not sure > exactly which settings were changed. > > As I mentioned though, IMAP sending and receiving is working fine on this > account. SquirrelMail is also an IMAP client. > Is there some way from the command line, to get this account > back to default SquirrelMail settings? Sure, find the user prefs file (or settings in your database) and change them to what your default prefs file has. But this is probably not your issue, and resetting user prefs will do nothing more than annoy your user. > And also, purge the deleted items > folder? Purging user mail should be taken seriously - it can eliminate mail the user didn't want to lose (no matter which folder), or mail that helps with forensics after a break-in. That said, how to purge messages depends entirely on what IMAP server you are using. Sometimes you can manually delete maildir files or clear out a mailbox file, but don't do that unless you know what you're doing. I.e., in the case of dovecot, you're better off using 'doveadm expunge'. -- Paul Lesniewski SquirrelMail Team Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail! http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/xeonphi ----- squirrelmail-devel mailing list Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines List address: squ...@li... List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.devel List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-devel |
From: oonet <squ...@oo...> - 2016-12-10 20:56:17
|
On 2016年12月05日 22:55, oonet wrote: > The point is we can't debug your setup for you, especially without any information whatsoever. Understood. I'll debug the setup. > HTTPS works for most everyone, so it's something peculiar to your environment. Https is working here too - though not the same as http. Are you saying that using https on other systems, compose-send returns the index and not a blank page? If so, I'm puzzled because there are no errors. But I'm sure there's an explanation. I have seen reference to a squirrelmail extension for apache, though I have not installed it. Just copied the squirrelmail directory to apache and linked to it. Only the bare minimum of extensions are enabled. Maybe there's one that squirrelmail tries to make use of when accessed by https? Or maybe the problem is limited to php5.6? -- View this message in context: http://squirrelmail.5843.n7.nabble.com/Squirrelmail-returns-blank-page-after-send-tp26436p26454.html Sent from the squirrelmail-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
From: Paul L. <pa...@sq...> - 2016-12-10 20:49:39
|
On 2016年12月05日 19:10, Kev...@ec... wrote: > > Thought I might as well feedback what I have found so far,in respect > of getting rid of the "Deprecated" messages that comw about simply > because the various classes don;t have an __construct() method. > > Clearly the developere will be aware of this info, but the info might > be useful to anyone else, who follows this thread, and who might want > to try and get rid of those messages, whilst the official changes get > added into the codebase. > > These files appear to be the ones that supply a class > > > squirrelmail/class/html.class.php:class html { > > squirrelmail/class/deliver/Deliver.class.php:class Deliver { > squirrelmail/class/deliver/Deliver_IMAP.class.php:class Deliver_IMAP > extends Deliver { > squirrelmail/class/deliver/Deliver_SMTP.class.php:class Deliver_SMTP > extends Deliver { > squirrelmail/class/deliver/Deliver_SendMail.class.php:class > Deliver_SendMail extends Deliver { > > squirrelmail/class/helper/VCard.class.php:class VCard { > > squirrelmail/class/mime/AddressStructure.class.php:class AddressStructure { > squirrelmail/class/mime/ContentType.class.php:class ContentType { > squirrelmail/class/mime/Disposition.class.php:class Disposition { > squirrelmail/class/mime/Language.class.php:class Language { > squirrelmail/class/mime/Message.class.php:class Message { > squirrelmail/class/mime/MessageHeader.class.php:class MessageHeader { > squirrelmail/class/mime/Rfc822Header.class.php:class Rfc822Header { > squirrelmail/class/mime/SMimeMessage.class.php:class SMimeMessage { > > squirrelmail/functions/abook_database.php:class abook_database extends > addressbook_backend { > squirrelmail/functions/abook_ldap_server.php:class abook_ldap_server > extends addressbook_backend { > squirrelmail/functions/abook_local_file.php:class abook_local_file extends > addressbook_backend { > squirrelmail/functions/addressbook.php:class AddressBook { > squirrelmail/functions/addressbook.php:class addressbook_backend { > squirrelmail/functions/db_prefs.php:class dbPrefs { > squirrelmail/functions/options.php:class SquirrelOption { FYI, I handled most all of this. Might have missed some, but got the most frequent offenders. -- Paul Lesniewski SquirrelMail Team Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail! http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php |
From: Rolan Y. <ro...@om...> - 2016-12-10 16:38:59
|
Did you examine what's being loaded or not loaded by the browser from within the developer console? (CTRL-SHIFT-j in Chrome) Load the page once with http and a second time https and compare the two under the Network pane. Could be a web server config issue. ~Rolan On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 10:10 PM, <Kev...@ec...> wrote: > > Thought I might as well feedback what I have found so far,in respect > of getting rid of the "Deprecated" messages that comw about simply > because the various classes don;t have an __construct() method. > |
From: Paul L. <pa...@sq...> - 2016-12-10 10:22:19
|
On 2016年12月09日 10:39, Kevin C. Connell wrote: > Greetings, > > We are running SquirrelMail 1.4.22, with Exim on CentOS. I have one email > account that is functional inbound/outbound using IMAP, but the problem > is, the SquirrelMail web page will not load, it times out. Please be specific with what "the SquirrelMail page" means. There are many "pages" in SquirrelMail. Do you mean that the login times out? Please refer to your server logs to see why. The mailing list archives have pointers of where to find your logs. If your IMAP server is timing out, you should see something in your logs. If SquirrelMail itself is timing out, watch the web server log for helpful information. You need to look at how big the user's INBOX is, your PHP memory limit and max execution time settings, etc. Make sure you are not using some kind of PHP-side modules that do things to all the user's INBOX messages, such as the "filters" plugin. And check the config file for what the $allow_thread_sort and $allow_server_sort settings are. Etc... > 2 things happened with this account prior to the web page not loading: > > 1) The account was hacked and was getting bombarded with spam email. An account doesn't have to be hacked to get bombarded with spam. In such a case, the user prefs will not have changed and your problem may simply be that you need to deal with an extremely large INBOX. > 2) Some SPAM and display settings were changed by the user. I'm not sure > exactly which settings were changed. > > As I mentioned though, IMAP sending and receiving is working fine on this > account. SquirrelMail is also an IMAP client. > Is there some way from the command line, to get this account > back to default SquirrelMail settings? Sure, find the user prefs file (or settings in your database) and change them to what your default prefs file has. But this is probably not your issue, and resetting user prefs will do nothing more than annoy your user. > And also, purge the deleted items > folder? Purging user mail should be taken seriously - it can eliminate mail the user didn't want to lose (no matter which folder), or mail that helps with forensics after a break-in. That said, how to purge messages depends entirely on what IMAP server you are using. Sometimes you can manually delete maildir files or clear out a mailbox file, but don't do that unless you know what you're doing. I.e., in the case of dovecot, you're better off using 'doveadm expunge'. -- Paul Lesniewski SquirrelMail Team Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail! http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php |
From: Paul L. <pa...@sq...> - 2016-12-10 09:57:17
|
On 2016年12月05日 23:14, oonet wrote: > Thanks for sending this. It looks like your problem is with php7. One of many > problems with php7, in fact, which is why we returned to php5. I hope your > feedback helps squirrelmail get working with php7! SquirrelMail works with PHP7 and you should not make claims to the contrary unless you can show something concrete. Your issue is likely a configuration/setup issue in your web server, but you provided no helpful information whatsoever (please read the mailing list posting guidelines next time). -- Paul Lesniewski SquirrelMail Team Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail! http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php |