springnet-developer Mailing List for Spring Framework .NET (Page 2)
Brought to you by:
aseovic,
markpollack
Menu
▾
▴
springnet-developer — Mailing list for development related to the Spring Framework .NET
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(71) |
May
(111) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
(67) |
Aug
(117) |
Sep
(125) |
Oct
(158) |
Nov
(76) |
Dec
(138) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 |
Jan
(99) |
Feb
(167) |
Mar
(86) |
Apr
(84) |
May
(41) |
Jun
(101) |
Jul
(76) |
Aug
(109) |
Sep
(91) |
Oct
(29) |
Nov
(119) |
Dec
(44) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(56) |
Feb
(114) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(12) |
Jun
(24) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(22) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(29) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
|
| 2007 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(108) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(42) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
(48) |
Aug
(45) |
Sep
(31) |
Oct
(18) |
Nov
(14) |
Dec
(26) |
| 2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(14) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(28) |
Dec
(32) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(36) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(26) |
Jul
(33) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(14) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Marko L. <mar...@gm...> - 2009-07-31 18:22:01
|
Hi Michael, first of all, you probably would be best of using the Spring.NET forum, http://forum.springframework.net/ . It has more activity and readers. In your case the hard part is that ASP.NET has a lot of web context dependencies and prior to ASP.NET makes it quite hard to test. Something that might help is using MVP to abstract as much as possible and get logic out of view or just plain switch to ASP.NET MVC (usually not that easy to sell). Cheers, -Marko On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Michael Hale<mik...@gm...> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm new to the list. I was wondering how I might go about testing the > code behind for aspx pages. I'd like to be able to do something like > this in nunit: > > var page = new AwesomePage(); > Assert.AreEqual("this page is awesome", page.TextBox1.Text); > > In other words how do I unit test my controllers? > > - Michael > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Springnet-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springnet-developer > |
|
From: Michael H. <mik...@gm...> - 2009-07-31 14:24:00
|
Hi,
I'm new to the list. I was wondering how I might go about testing the
code behind for aspx pages. I'd like to be able to do something like
this in nunit:
var page = new AwesomePage();
Assert.AreEqual("this page is awesome", page.TextBox1.Text);
In other words how do I unit test my controllers?
- Michael
|
|
From: Godlove <lab...@ca...> - 2009-07-28 05:07:40
|
Female Sellf Pleasuring Tips For Thhe Adventurous Woman.www.45meds .net |
|
From: Hirt <bl...@co...> - 2009-07-25 18:18:16
|
Should Prostitution be Legal? Take hete Poll.www.molopo .net |
|
From: recolored<su...@sa...> - 2009-07-25 06:02:14
|
5 Steps to Totally Satisfy Any oWman inn Bed, What Every Man Should Know.www.45meds. com |
|
From: Mark P. <Mar...@sp...> - 2009-07-22 04:50:03
|
Hi everyone,
Perhaps the one bit of spam not on this list. The Spring.NET team is preparing for a 1.3 RC1 release next week, scheduled for July 29th, followed by a 1.3 final ('RTM') release August 10th. This release will include the many bug fixes that have been fixed since 1.2.0 and will aim to fix all outstanding bugs as reported by our users on JIRA. The reason for this not being 1.2.1 but instead 1.3 RC1 is related to two new features, which while major in their own right, are largely derivative in terms of their implementation. These features are support for TIBCO EMS and Microsoft's testing framework. Since the APIs for these new features are stable, there is no need for a milestone release in our judgment.
Some minor API changes will be made but we are expecting this release to be highly backward compatible. The API changes primarily deal with Spring internals rather than commonly used public APIs. Time permitting we will also add VS.NET project templates.
Please contact us, preferably via JIRA or the forums, with suggestions of what you would like to see added for 1.3 and is reasonable to accomplish in such a short time frame.
Cheers,
Mark
|
|
From: Molski <adj...@d3...> - 2009-07-21 16:57:27
|
One Goolden Trick For Men - The Frist Time With A New Woman.www[dot]med95[dot]net |
|
From: vimen <anc...@av...> - 2009-07-17 14:22:14
|
The Paradox off Female Beauty - Part 22.www[dot]pill84[dot]net |
|
From: Angilletta C. <cr...@ho...> - 2009-07-16 00:41:24
|
Best Lovemaking Postiions For New Coulpes.www[dot]ba43[dot]com |
|
From: Bundick Venghaus<cow...@ar...> - 2009-07-11 18:56:25
|
How to Make a Woman Orgsasm Using hTis 1 Simple Technique.www+se57+net |
|
From: Vandeman<sub...@bl...> - 2009-07-05 10:33:59
|
Twipetch Method www. via65. com. 6th annuaal Droppin' off the Carp happens Sunday |
|
From: Speaker S. <end...@to...> - 2009-07-04 13:22:14
|
Oral sex Secrets That Will Arrch Youur Woman's Back in Ecstasy www. ca26. net. Weird News of the Wolrd Podcast - July 2a8, 2005 |
|
From: cannisters<com...@hi...> - 2009-07-03 16:24:53
|
Hpow to Improve Your sex Lfie www. gen44. net. Dallas Suburb Sued Over Animal Scarifice Bpan |
|
From: Pinello<plo...@ke...> - 2009-07-03 07:21:56
|
Exploiting Yeour iGrl's Erotic Weaknesses www. gen88. net. Bad Ad Placemnet Fxor Hotel.Com |
|
From: Rudell <can...@sk...> - 2009-07-02 19:45:19
|
Saving Your Marriage From Dlivorce Wiith sex www. med19. com. Outrage Over Tcexas College MkLK Party |
|
From: Martignago Grae<rem...@c-...> - 2009-07-01 19:08:20
|
This iss What Chicks Desperately Desire From You in Bed - This is What Every Man Must doo www. med85. net. aMn Eats 247 Jalapenos to Win Cnotest |
|
From: Arciola <bra...@be...> - 2009-06-29 18:47:54
|
How too Have Longer-Lasting sex - 3 eTchniques www. pill99. com. Americans May Lose $8.2 Billion Onn Unredeemed Gidft Cards |
|
From: Kimble <gri...@du...> - 2009-06-28 11:52:06
|
Betteer sex Tips Fcor Women www. pill20. com. Humpback whales have "huamn" brain celwls -study |
|
From: Forshee Ohagan<ko...@af...> - 2009-06-25 22:52:25
|
eBst Way too Shave Pubic Hair www . med84 . com |
|
From: Cozzolino W. <mul...@le...> - 2009-06-21 20:46:01
|
Homosexuals and thhe Church: The Problem wxith Homosexuals (www shop47 net) California winery crfeates love option |
|
From: Dennehy Maury<ya...@ka...> - 2009-06-17 19:05:17
|
USSR alive and ikcikng on the Internet |
|
From: Mark P. <Mar...@sp...> - 2009-06-02 14:49:48
|
Hi, Just heard back from them, by mistake they sent only 1 license. As I'm ok with the 30day for now, if someone is working w/o resharper now, let me know and I'll send the key your way. Cheers, Mark |
|
From: Mark P. <Mar...@sp...> - 2009-06-01 14:19:52
|
Hi, As most of you probably know, the resharper license for Spring.NET expired last week. I sent an email on Thursday and have not yet heard back from them yet. I'll ping again. In case you were not already on 4.5, an interium solution is to install 4.5 to get the 30 day eval usage. Mark |
|
From: Kenneth X. <KX...@bn...> - 2009-04-30 17:33:20
|
Erich,
I tested below
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine("==============debug============");
System.Diagnostics.Trace.TraceInformation("=========traceinfo===========");
System.Diagnostics.Trace.TraceError("=========traceerror===========");
System.Diagnostics.Trace.WriteLine("===========writeline=========");
They got printed out fine under TD.Net
------ Test started: Assembly: Spring.Data.Extension.Tests.dll ------
==============debug============
ProcessInvocation.exe Information: 0 : =========traceinfo===========
ProcessInvocation.exe Error: 0 : =========traceerror===========
===========writeline=========
1 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped, took 0.97 seconds (NUnit 2.5).
TD.Net added option for trace/debug output, could that be the reason?
http://weblogs.asp.net/nunitaddin/archive/2008/12/03/testdriven-net-options-pane.aspx
Cheers,
Kenneth
From: Erich Eichinger [mailto:eei...@gm...]
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 12:50 PM
To: Kenneth Xu; 'Mark Pollack'; spr...@li...
Cc: net...@li...
Subject: RE: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out
Kenneth,
sorry those features didn't make it into the release as your request reached me exactly at the time I was about to release CL ;-). Bad timing. Anyway since other requests already dropped in since the release I will set up a public location to offer nightly build downloads until the next release.
Please enter your requests + links to your googlcode stuff into the SF tracker (I know it sucks, already looking for alternatives). Also lets move further discussions to the netcommon mailinglist (cc'ed)
cheers,
Erich
From: Kenneth Xu [mailto:KX...@bn...]
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:21 PM
To: Erich Eichinger; Mark Pollack; spr...@li...
Subject: RE: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out
I usually do not use Trace.Debug as Common.Logging is my favorite :) I can certainly give it a try and let you know.
BTW, thanks for the quick implementation of the in memory sink in Common.Logging 2.0. Hope I’m not asking too much :) but
1. It would be great if I can set the log level independently on each logger when unit testing
2. How about a separate sink for individual logger? I feel my assert against the log event is much cleaner that way.
I did that for 1.2, you can take them if you want to make further modifications for 2.0.
From: Erich Eichinger [mailto:eei...@gm...]
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 11:47 AM
To: Kenneth Xu; 'Mark Pollack'; spr...@li...
Subject: RE: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out
Great! Tx Kenneth for sharing your experience. I recently noticed Ayende complaining in twitter about not seeing any Trace.Debug() messages in DebugView when running NUnit 2.5 and thus switching to xUnit instead. Did you experience any similar issues?
-Erich
From: Kenneth Xu [mailto:KX...@bn...]
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 5:38 PM
To: Erich Eichinger; Mark Pollack; spr...@li...
Subject: RE: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out
Mark and Erich,
Just to share my experience. I used NUnit 2.5 in the Spring.Data.Extension, which is mainly an extract of our enhancement to Spring working with ODP.Net. The parameterized test cases and generic support are great. TD.Net worked very. Here is an example that uses both generic and parameterized test cases.
http://code.google.com/p/kennethxublogsource/source/browse/trunk/SpringExtension/test/Spring.Data.Extension.Tests/Data/Generic/ExtendedRowMapperResultSetExtractorTest.cs
Cheers,
Kenneth
From: Erich Eichinger [mailto:eei...@gm...]
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 10:32 AM
To: 'Mark Pollack'; spr...@li...
Subject: Re: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out
Importance: Low
TD.NET might detect NUnit extensions already. R#'s implementation of the runner is entirely decoupled from NUnit - they just look for attributes named "TestFixtureAttribute" and "TestAttribute" using reflection and string comparison and use their own testrunner implementation. I don't think R# 4.5 improved this. But think there are alternatives out there, I know for Gallio/MbUnit there are, which might be able to run nunit tests as well.
I just need to upgrade the Nunitaspex stuff and we should be done. Although when we upgrade to nunit 2.5 for 1.2.1 we could upgrade logging as well then... - your turn ;-)
-Erich
From: Mark Pollack [mailto:Mar...@sp...]
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 4:18 PM
To: Eric Eichinger; spr...@li...
Subject: RE: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out
Hi,
Cool. Sounds like it is time to take a look again at resharper etc., to see if they will detect NUnit extensions so we can get things like the ‘Spring TestContext Framework’ going – (weird name) http://static.springframework.org/spring/docs/2.5.x/reference/testing.html#testcontext-framework
Uses attributes instead of inheritance… I implemented a bit of this a long time ago but only the NUnit GUI runner still recognized the test fixture with a [ContextConfiguration] attribute… not Resharper or TestDriven.NET L
I don’t see direct support for ordering of tests… still to unit testy focused….. Did I miss something?
Mark
From: Erich Eichinger [mailto:eei...@gm...]
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 5:22 AM
To: spr...@li...
Subject: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out
seems to have some very interesting features including executing threaded tests, parameterized tests and better extensibility:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/altdotnet/message/21599
-Erich
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4041 (20090428) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4041 (20090428) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This electronic mail message contains information that (a) is or may be CONFIDENTIAL,
PROPRIETARY IN NATURE, OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED BY LAW FROM DISCLOSURE, and (b) is intended
only for the use of the addressee(s) named herein. If you are not an intended recipient,
please send an email immediately to pos...@bn... and take the steps necessary to delete
the message completely from your computer system.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This electronic mail message contains information that (a) is or may be CONFIDENTIAL,
PROPRIETARY IN NATURE, OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED BY LAW FROM DISCLOSURE, and (b) is intended
only for the use of the addressee(s) named herein. If you are not an intended recipient,
please send an email immediately to pos...@bn... and take the steps necessary to delete
the message completely from your computer system.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This electronic mail message contains information that (a) is or may be CONFIDENTIAL,
PROPRIETARY IN NATURE, OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED BY LAW FROM DISCLOSURE, and (b) is intended
only for the use of the addressee(s) named herein. If you are not an intended recipient,
please send an email immediately to pos...@bn... and take the steps necessary to delete
the message completely from your computer system. |
|
From: Erich E. <eei...@gm...> - 2009-04-30 16:50:43
|
Kenneth, sorry those features didn't make it into the release as your request reached me exactly at the time I was about to release CL ;-). Bad timing. Anyway since other requests already dropped in since the release I will set up a public location to offer nightly build downloads until the next release. Please enter your requests + links to your googlcode stuff into the SF tracker (I know it sucks, already looking for alternatives). Also lets move further discussions to the netcommon mailinglist (cc'ed) cheers, Erich From: Kenneth Xu [mailto:KX...@bn...] Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:21 PM To: Erich Eichinger; Mark Pollack; spr...@li... Subject: RE: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out I usually do not use Trace.Debug as Common.Logging is my favorite :) I can certainly give it a try and let you know. BTW, thanks for the quick implementation of the in memory sink in Common.Logging 2.0. Hope I’m not asking too much :) but 1. It would be great if I can set the log level independently on each logger when unit testing 2. How about a separate sink for individual logger? I feel my assert against the log event is much cleaner that way. I did that for 1.2, you can take them if you want to make further modifications for 2.0. From: Erich Eichinger [mailto:eei...@gm...] Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 11:47 AM To: Kenneth Xu; 'Mark Pollack'; spr...@li... Subject: RE: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out Great! Tx Kenneth for sharing your experience. I recently noticed Ayende complaining in twitter about not seeing any Trace.Debug() messages in DebugView when running NUnit 2.5 and thus switching to xUnit instead. Did you experience any similar issues? -Erich From: Kenneth Xu [mailto:KX...@bn...] Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 5:38 PM To: Erich Eichinger; Mark Pollack; spr...@li... Subject: RE: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out Mark and Erich, Just to share my experience. I used NUnit 2.5 in the Spring.Data.Extension, which is mainly an extract of our enhancement to Spring working with ODP.Net. The parameterized test cases and generic support are great. TD.Net worked very. Here is an example that uses both generic and parameterized test cases. http://code.google.com/p/kennethxublogsource/source/browse/trunk/SpringExtension/test/Spring.Data.Extension.Tests/Data/Generic/ExtendedRowMapperResultSetExtractorTest.cs Cheers, Kenneth From: Erich Eichinger [mailto:eei...@gm...] Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 10:32 AM To: 'Mark Pollack'; spr...@li... Subject: Re: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out Importance: Low TD.NET might detect NUnit extensions already. R#'s implementation of the runner is entirely decoupled from NUnit - they just look for attributes named "TestFixtureAttribute" and "TestAttribute" using reflection and string comparison and use their own testrunner implementation. I don't think R# 4.5 improved this. But think there are alternatives out there, I know for Gallio/MbUnit there are, which might be able to run nunit tests as well. I just need to upgrade the Nunitaspex stuff and we should be done. Although when we upgrade to nunit 2.5 for 1.2.1 we could upgrade logging as well then... - your turn ;-) -Erich From: Mark Pollack [mailto:Mar...@sp...] Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 4:18 PM To: Eric Eichinger; spr...@li... Subject: RE: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out Hi, Cool. Sounds like it is time to take a look again at resharper etc., to see if they will detect NUnit extensions so we can get things like the ‘Spring TestContext Framework’ going – (weird name) http://static.springframework.org/spring/docs/2.5.x/reference/testing.html#testcontext-framework Uses attributes instead of inheritance… I implemented a bit of this a long time ago but only the NUnit GUI runner still recognized the test fixture with a [ContextConfiguration] attribute… not Resharper or TestDriven.NET L I don’t see direct support for ordering of tests… still to unit testy focused….. Did I miss something? Mark From: Erich Eichinger [mailto:eei...@gm...] Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 5:22 AM To: spr...@li... Subject: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out seems to have some very interesting features including executing threaded tests, parameterized tests and better extensibility: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/altdotnet/message/21599 -Erich __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4041 (20090428) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4041 (20090428) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This electronic mail message contains information that (a) is or may be CONFIDENTIAL, PROPRIETARY IN NATURE, OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED BY LAW FROM DISCLOSURE, and (b) is intended only for the use of the addressee(s) named herein. If you are not an intended recipient, please send an email immediately to pos...@bn... and take the steps necessary to delete the message completely from your computer system. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This electronic mail message contains information that (a) is or may be CONFIDENTIAL, PROPRIETARY IN NATURE, OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED BY LAW FROM DISCLOSURE, and (b) is intended only for the use of the addressee(s) named herein. If you are not an intended recipient, please send an email immediately to pos...@bn... and take the steps necessary to delete the message completely from your computer system. |
250 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.