From: Christophe R. <cs...@ca...> - 2006-09-27 08:33:12
|
William Harold Newman <wil...@ai...> writes: > As hinted in the NEWS file, and as discussed a little on the > sbcl-devel mailing list, it has come time to think about calling this > thing version 1.0. The 1.0 release may well just be another fairly > ordinary time-boxed release; I think it's slightly more likely to be > in late November than late October, so perhaps the answer to "0.9.99?" > is "0.9.98, actually." Speaking of 1.0 and so on, even though it is likely to be just another time-boxed release, it might also be an opportunity for us to collect our thoughts and present them in various different media. For my own dayjob community's point of view, a paper describing various interesting bits of stuff in SBCL (maybe targeted at a journal something like "Software: Practice and Experience") would be appropriate, I think. Firstly, would there be any objections to an effort along those lines, and secondly, would anyone be interested in collaborating on it? Cheers, Christophe |