From: Stephan F. <def...@go...> - 2013-08-27 19:24:30
|
Hi, when I announced SB-GMP there was also interest in accessing the MPFR library. I have now mostly completed work on SB-MPFR and I am currently looking on input wrt. the provided interface (especially concerning the shadowing of some common CL functions for their MPFR counterparts). There is no fully fledged test suite yet, only a couple of sample functions. SB-MPFR requires SB-GMP in form of the the slightly updated version as present in the same repository. https://github.com/sfrank/sb-gmp Regards, Stephan |
From: Stas B. <sta...@gm...> - 2013-08-27 19:57:00
|
Stephan Frank <def...@go...> writes: > Hi, > > when I announced SB-GMP there was also interest in accessing the MPFR > library. I have now mostly completed work on SB-MPFR and I am currently > looking on input wrt. the provided interface (especially concerning the > shadowing of some common CL functions for their MPFR counterparts). > There is no fully fledged test suite yet, only a couple of sample > functions. > > SB-MPFR requires SB-GMP in form of the the slightly updated version as > present in the same repository. > > https://github.com/sfrank/sb-gmp Have you seen this bug-report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbcl/+bug/1206191 ? -- With best regards, Stas. |
From: Stephan F. <def...@go...> - 2013-08-28 18:44:24
|
On 08/27/2013 09:56 PM, Stas Boukarev wrote: > Stephan Frank <def...@go...> writes: > >> Hi, >> >> when I announced SB-GMP there was also interest in accessing the MPFR >> library. I have now mostly completed work on SB-MPFR and I am currently >> looking on input wrt. the provided interface (especially concerning the >> shadowing of some common CL functions for their MPFR counterparts). >> There is no fully fledged test suite yet, only a couple of sample >> functions. >> >> SB-MPFR requires SB-GMP in form of the the slightly updated version as >> present in the same repository. >> >> https://github.com/sfrank/sb-gmp > Have you seen this bug-report: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbcl/+bug/1206191 ? > Hi Stas, as you may have already seen, I have committed a fix to the development repo of SB-GMP. If you can confirm that this resolves the problem I'd appreciate if someone could add the updated gmp.lisp and tests.lisp to the SBCL tree. Regs, Stephan |