From: <mar...@gm...> - 2006-12-01 14:54:14
|
Congratulations to all sbcl developers (and users) for this 1.0 release. I have one question about versioning? What is going to be next version, 1.0.1 or 1.1? Since "leading 0" period is now past, there might be no need for for numbers versioning. |
From: Nikodemus S. <nik...@ra...> - 2006-12-01 15:16:45
|
"Marko Kocić" <mar...@gm...> writes: > Congratulations to all sbcl developers (and users) for this 1.0 release. > > I have one question about versioning? What is going to be next > version, 1.0.1 or 1.1? Since "leading 0" period is now past, there > might be no need for for numbers versioning. The current plan is that 1.0.1 is due in a month or so, and 1.1 whenever it feels appropriate. Cheers, -- Nikodemus Schemer: "Buddha is small, clean, and serious." Lispnik: "Buddha is big, has hairy armpits, and laughs." |
From: Vamsee K. <vam...@gm...> - 2006-12-01 16:51:36
|
Marko Kocić wrote: > Congratulations to all sbcl developers (and users) for this 1.0 release. > Congratulations from me too, and heart-felt thanks. SBCL is a joy to work with. Please don't pay heed to what the doubters on the c.l.l say: SBCL makes a very important contribution to the world by making a high-quality free lisp available to programmers from the developing countries (like me, from India). Just to let you all know that we appreciate it! Vamsee. |