From: Yaroslav K. <kav...@tu...> - 2006-03-11 08:46:40
Attachments:
win32.part1.patch.gz
|
Get external format from windows OEM codepage and ANSI codepage. Set default-external-format from windows OEM codepage. |
From: Rudi S. <ru...@co...> - 2006-03-21 13:43:28
Attachments:
PGP.sig
|
On 11. M=E4r 2006, at 09:46, Yaroslav Kavenchuk wrote: > Get external format from windows OEM codepage and ANSI codepage. > Set default-external-format from windows OEM codepage. Builds and self-builds, and looks quite non-invasive. Can this still =20= be merged on the first day of freeze? Regards, Rudi |
From: Yaroslav K. <kav...@je...> - 2006-03-21 14:37:29
|
Rudi Schlatte wrote: >> Get external format from windows OEM codepage and ANSI codepage. >> Set default-external-format from windows OEM codepage. > > Builds and self-builds, and looks quite non-invasive. Can this still > be merged on the first day of freeze? Please take the version from March, 18. And ,maybe, change in (defun default-external-format... (sb!win32::oem-cp) to (sb!win32::ansi-cp)? IMHO, it is right. -- WBR, Yaroslav Kavenchuk. |
From: Rudi S. <ru...@co...> - 2006-03-21 15:54:15
Attachments:
PGP.sig
|
On 21. M=E4r 2006, at 15:38, Yaroslav Kavenchuk wrote: > Please take the version from March, 18. > > And ,maybe, change in (defun default-external-format... (sb!=20 > win32::oem-cp) to (sb!win32::ansi-cp)? Done and committed. Cheers, Rudi |
From: Yaroslav K. <kav...@je...> - 2006-03-21 17:34:03
|
Rudi Schlatte wrote: > Done and committed. Many thanks, but I asked to use patch from March, 18 - in it there were some corrections. -- WBR, Yaroslav Kavenchuk. |
From: Rudi S. <ru...@co...> - 2006-03-21 23:08:01
Attachments:
PGP.sig
|
On 21. M=E4r 2006, at 18:36, Yaroslav Kavenchuk wrote: > Rudi Schlatte wrote: >> Done and committed. > > Many thanks, but I asked to use patch from March, 18 - in it there =20 > were some corrections. Hmm, I thought I had taken that one -- I just now extracted the patch =20= from your mail on march 18 and compared to what I committed, and =20 can't find a difference. It's perfectly possible that either me or =20 my mailer are confused, though -- could I ask you to resend any =20 changes you wish to see in the tree before the release? Many thanks, Rudi |
From: Yaroslav K. <kav...@je...> - 2006-03-22 07:50:32
Attachments:
win32.part1.v2.patch.gz
|
Rudi Schlatte wrote: > Hmm, I thought I had taken that one -- I just now extracted the patch > from your mail on march 18 and compared to what I committed, and > can't find a difference. It's perfectly possible that either me or > my mailer are confused, though -- could I ask you to resend any > changes you wish to see in the tree before the release? Oops, excuse me! My bug. This is version with last changes. Thanks! -- WBR, Yaroslav Kavenchuk. |
From: Rudi S. <ru...@co...> - 2006-03-22 11:47:55
Attachments:
PGP.sig
|
On 22. M=E4r 2006, at 08:52, Yaroslav Kavenchuk wrote: > Rudi Schlatte wrote: >> Hmm, I thought I had taken that one -- I just now extracted the =20 >> patch from your mail on march 18 and compared to what I =20 >> committed, and can't find a difference. It's perfectly possible =20 >> that either me or my mailer are confused, though -- could I ask =20 >> you to resend any changes you wish to see in the tree before the =20 >> release? > > Oops, excuse me! My bug. This is version with last changes. Thanks, committed as 0.9.10.47. I replaced 'cp' with 'codepage' in various identifiers; it looks =20 clearer and more in line with the rest of the code. Cheers, Rudi |
From: Yaroslav K. <kav...@je...> - 2006-03-22 11:51:23
|
Rudi Schlatte wrote: > Thanks, committed as 0.9.10.47. > > I replaced 'cp' with 'codepage' in various identifiers; it looks > clearer and more in line with the rest of the code. > Many thanks. I'm happy! :) -- WBR, Yaroslav Kavenchuk. |