From: Mark K. <mar...@at...> - 2002-11-24 14:56:33
|
Hi guys, I'm bringing up my Pro Tools box as dual boot so that I can work in RG doing MIDI and then drive my other computer that has GigaStudio. I've got the machine dual booting with RH7.3, lots of stuff installed, and then went to build RG. Everything in the build seemed to run fine, but in the end I got no RG, nor any error messages I recognized. Using the instructions from the INSTALL file, I did something pretty close to this: (In windows right now, so this is from memory...) make -f Makefile.cvs ./configure (with all stuff listed in example, like '--with-alsa=yes', etc.) make make install Am I forgetting something I learned a month ago? What did I do wrong? Thanks, Mark |
From: Guillaume L. <gla...@te...> - 2002-11-24 15:00:56
|
On Sunday 24 November 2002 15:57, Mark Knecht wrote: > Am I forgetting something I learned a month ago? What did I do wrong? Apparently nothing, but then what do you mean by "I got no RG" ? You try to launch it and it's not there ? It doesn't appear in the KDE menus ? -- Guillaume. http://www.telegraph-road.org |
From: Mark K. <mar...@at...> - 2002-11-24 16:14:09
|
Guillaume, Hi. Thanks for responding. By 'I got no RG' I meant that I cannot find= a=20 rosegarden executable anywhere. I'm responding to this from Linux now. I'= m=20 trying to make a real switch between turning Windows on first in the morn= ing=20 and turning on Linux. I got Wine running and am going to get over here. T= his=20 is from KMail. A first for me. Hopefully it will go through to you and th= e=20 reflector. To do the build I logged in a mark, su -, password for root, did a CVS=20 download of RG. Then=20 cd rosegarden make -f Makefile.cvs =2E/configure --with-qt-dir=3D/usr/lib/qt3 --prefix=3D/opt/kde3 --with-al= sa=3Dyes make make install The whole thing finishes (much faster on a Athlon XP 1600 than my old=20 P3-500, thank you) and I'm back at a command line prompt. I didn't notice= any=20 major issues. A few code warnings as it compiles, but nothing major.=20 At this point I cd back to the top of root, type rose and hit Tab. I s= ee=20 rosegarden/ the directory, not the executable. I remove the /, hit enter, command not= =20 found. I feel like I must have just missed a step somewhere. This is RH 7.3. = I'm=20 running KDE 3.0.X I guess.=20 I'm going to blow the whole thing away and start it ovver again. The f= irst=20 time I did this I had older autoconf/automake stuff installed. Maybe ther= e's=20 a problem from using that in the beginning. We'll see. In the meantime, I appreciate your help. Cheers, Mark On Sunday 24 November 2002 07:00 am, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > On Sunday 24 November 2002 15:57, Mark Knecht wrote: > > Am I forgetting something I learned a month ago? What did I do wro= ng? > > Apparently nothing, but then what do you mean by "I got no RG" ? You tr= y to > launch it and it's not there ? It doesn't appear in the KDE menus ? |
From: Guillaume L. <gla...@te...> - 2002-11-24 16:17:35
|
On Sunday 24 November 2002 17:14, Mark Knecht wrote: > I'm going to blow the whole thing away and start it ovver again. No reason to. RG is installed somewhere, just not in root's path (and BTW you should only install as root, not compile). Look at the ouput of 'make install', it will tell you where it got installed. -- Guillaume. http://www.telegraph-road.org |
From: Mark K. <mar...@at...> - 2002-11-24 16:23:00
|
Problems using latest RPMS: automake-1.6.3-1.noarch.rpm autoconf-2.56-1.noarch.rpm I need to downgrade something I guess? [root@Godzilla rosegarden]# make -f Makefile.cvs This Makefile is only for the CVS repository This will be deleted before making the distribution *** Using automake 1.6 may be unstable *** Creating acinclude.m4 !!! If you get recursion errors from autoconf, it is advisable to set the environment variable M4 to something including "--nesting-limit=3D500= " *** Creating list of subdirectories *** Creating configure.in *** Creating aclocal.m4 *** Creating configure configure.in:250: error: m4_popdef: undefined macro: AC_Dest autoconf/status.m4:844: AC_CONFIG_FILES is expanded from... configure.in:250: the top level autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 1 Can't open configure: No such file or directory. *** Creating config.h template WARNING: Using auxiliary files such as `acconfig.h', `config.h.bot' WARNING: and `config.h.top', to define templates for `config.h.in' WARNING: is deprecated and discouraged. WARNING: Using the third argument of `AC_DEFINE' and WARNING: `AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED' allows to define a template without WARNING: `acconfig.h': WARNING: AC_DEFINE([NEED_MAIN], 1, WARNING: [Define if a function `main' is needed.]) WARNING: More sophisticated templates can also be produced, see the WARNING: documentation. configure.in:250: error: m4_popdef: undefined macro: AC_Dest autoconf/status.m4:844: AC_CONFIG_FILES is expanded from... configure.in:250: the top level autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 1 autoheader: /usr/bin/autom4te failed with exit status: 1 *** Creating Makefile templates configure.in:44: required file `./config.h.in' not found *** Postprocessing Makefile templates *** Creating date/time stamp *** Finished Don't forget to run ./configure If you haven't done so in a while, run ./configure --help [root@Godzilla rosegarden]# On Sunday 24 November 2002 07:00 am, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > On Sunday 24 November 2002 15:57, Mark Knecht wrote: > > Am I forgetting something I learned a month ago? What did I do wro= ng? > > Apparently nothing, but then what do you mean by "I got no RG" ? You tr= y to > launch it and it's not there ? It doesn't appear in the KDE menus ? |
From: Guillaume L. <gla...@te...> - 2002-11-24 16:44:48
|
On Sunday 24 November 2002 17:23, Mark Knecht wrote: > Problems using latest RPMS: > > automake-1.6.3-1.noarch.rpm > autoconf-2.56-1.noarch.rpm > > I need to downgrade something I guess? Apparently yes. The same problem was reported by someone using automake 1.6 as well. I'll try to update our admin dir, though. -- Guillaume. http://www.telegraph-road.org |
From: Mark K. <mar...@at...> - 2002-11-24 18:02:35
|
Guillaume, I found a number of things wrong with my setup: autoconf 1.6 vs. 1.4p5-4 AND... Qt support compiled with threads. I ran into this for Muse, when I tried=20 building it. I guess I solved the problem on the other machine because it= =20 hasn't been an issue on that guy, but on the new machine I need to get th= at=20 handled. (And I don't know how!)=20 Off to see if I can find directions. Are they in a RG file somewhere? A v= i=20 search tells me the INSTALL file does not have the words 'Qt' or 'thread'= in=20 it... Thanks, Mark On Sunday 24 November 2002 08:44 am, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > On Sunday 24 November 2002 17:23, Mark Knecht wrote: > > Problems using latest RPMS: > > > > automake-1.6.3-1.noarch.rpm > > autoconf-2.56-1.noarch.rpm > > > > I need to downgrade something I guess? > > Apparently yes. The same problem was reported by someone using automake= 1.6 > as well. I'll try to update our admin dir, though. |
From: Guillaume L. <gla...@te...> - 2002-11-24 18:21:10
|
On Sunday 24 November 2002 19:03, Mark Knecht wrote: > I found a number of things wrong with my setup: > > autoconf 1.6 vs. 1.4p5-4 May be that one will work now I've updated admin/. > AND... > > Qt support compiled with threads. Er, what do you mean ? Your Qt is compiled with threads, or it isn't ? In any case, it must, and should be (unless you're still using Qt2/KDE2). -- Guillaume. http://www.telegraph-road.org |
From: Mark K. <mar...@at...> - 2002-11-24 18:37:55
|
Guillaume, OK, so we'll make very apparent the hardware guy's lack of software=20 knowledge. ;-) Here goes. Qt? What's that? synaptic say I have abot 15 Qt things installed. Plea= se=20 remember I'm Redhat/PlanetCCRMA based, so almost everythign except Rosega= rden=20 and Ardour is installed using RPMs. I wouldn't know if it was compiled wi= th=20 threads, or not. The message I see in the configure step is: =2E/configure --with-qt-dir=3D/usr/lib/qt3 --prefix=3D/opt/kde3 --with-al= sa=3Dyes <SNIP> checking for Qt... configure: error: Qt (>=3D Qt 3.1 (20021021)) (library= qt-mt)=20 not found. Please check your installation! For more details about this problem, look at the end of config.log. Make sure that you have compiled Qt with thread support! [root@Godzilla rosegarden]# So, looking at /usr/lib is a large directory, but I see this Qt stuff: [root@Godzilla lib]# ls -al q* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8 Nov 23 05:02 qt2 -> qt-2.3.1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8 Nov 23 04:52 qt3 -> qt-3.0.3 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8 Nov 23 04:52 qt3-gcc2.96 ->=20 qt-3.0.3 How's a guy supposed to know if any of this has been compiled with sup= port=20 for threads? It's just there and installed to a user like me. On my previous machine, when I installed Muse (or tried to) there were= =20 some minimal instructions for compiling Qt that didn't work, and then the= =20 developers came up with some more instructions via the reflector. Since t= his=20 is a new machine I probably need to do something like that here. Do you, Chris or Richard have some specific instructions about what I=20 should download and compile? I'm looking around TrollTech's site now hopi= gn=20 to find soemthign downloadable, since I remember Qt takign hours and hour= s to=20 compile the last time. Mark On Sunday 24 November 2002 10:20 am, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > On Sunday 24 November 2002 19:03, Mark Knecht wrote: > > I found a number of things wrong with my setup: > > > > autoconf 1.6 vs. 1.4p5-4 > > May be that one will work now I've updated admin/. > > > AND... > > > > Qt support compiled with threads. > > Er, what do you mean ? Your Qt is compiled with threads, or it isn't ? = In > any case, it must, and should be (unless you're still using Qt2/KDE2). |
From: Guillaume L. <gla...@te...> - 2002-11-25 00:24:16
|
On Sunday 24 November 2002 19:38, Mark Knecht wrote: > > Qt? What's that? The graphic toolkit KDE (and Rosegarden) is built on. See www.trolltech.com > The message I see in the configure step is: > > ./configure --with-qt-dir=/usr/lib/qt3 --prefix=/opt/kde3 --with-alsa=yes > <SNIP> > checking for Qt... configure: error: Qt (>= Qt 3.1 (20021021)) (library > qt-mt) not found. Please check your installation! OK, that's the problem, but I need to fix it on our side. -- Guillaume. http://www.telegraph-road.org |
From: Mark K. <mar...@at...> - 2002-11-24 18:53:21
|
I think the Qt installed on my system is higher than the configure step i= s=20 accepting? =46rom my qglobals.h file in /usr/lib/qt3/includes #ifndef QGLOBAL_H #define QGLOBAL_H #define QT_VERSION 303 #define QT_VERSION_STR "3.0.3" =46rom configure.log in /root/rosegarden: configure:21516: checking for Qt configure: 21583: /usr/lib/qt3/include/qstyle.h = =20 taking that configure:21693: rm -rf SunWS_cache; g++ -o conftest -Wnon-virtual-dtor=20 -Wno-long-long -Wundef -Wall -pedantic -W -Wpointer-arith=20 -Wmissing-prototypes -Wwrite-strings -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=3D500 -D_BSD_S= OURCE=20 -Wcast-align -Wconversion -O2 -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new=20 -I/usr/lib/qt3/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT =20 -D_REENTRANT -L/usr/lib/qt3/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib conftest.cc -lqt-mt=20 -lpng -lz -lm -ljpeg -ldl -lXext -lX11 -lSM -lICE -lpthread 1>&5 conftest.cc:8:2: #error 1 = =20 configure:21696: $? =3D 1 configure: failed program was: = =20 #include "confdefs.h" #include <qglobal.h> = =20 #include <qapplication.h> #include <qcursor.h> #include <qstylefactory.h> #include <private/qucomextra_p.h> = =20 #if ! (QT_VERSION >=3D 0x030100) #error 1 #endif int main() { (void)QStyleFactory::create(QString::null); = =20 QCursor c(Qt::WhatsThisCursor); return 0; } configure:21736: error: Qt (>=3D Qt 3.1 (20021021)) (library qt-mt) not f= ound.=20 Please check your installation! For more details about this problem, look at the end of config.log. = =20 Make sure that you have compiled Qt with thread support! On Sunday 24 November 2002 10:20 am, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > On Sunday 24 November 2002 19:03, Mark Knecht wrote: > > I found a number of things wrong with my setup: > > > > autoconf 1.6 vs. 1.4p5-4 > > May be that one will work now I've updated admin/. > > > AND... > > > > Qt support compiled with threads. > > Er, what do you mean ? Your Qt is compiled with threads, or it isn't ? = In > any case, it must, and should be (unless you're still using Qt2/KDE2). |
From: Guillaume L. <gla...@te...> - 2002-11-25 00:25:18
|
On Sunday 24 November 2002 19:53, Mark Knecht wrote: > I think the Qt installed on my system is higher than the configure step is > accepting? No, lower. You have 3.0.3, our framework now requires 3.1 (until I fix it). -- Guillaume. http://www.telegraph-road.org |
From: Guillaume L. <gla...@te...> - 2002-11-25 00:44:22
|
On Monday 25 November 2002 01:25, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > On Sunday 24 November 2002 19:53, Mark Knecht wrote: > > I think the Qt installed on my system is higher than the configure step > > is accepting? > > No, lower. You have 3.0.3, our framework now requires 3.1 (until I fix it). Should be fixed now. -- Guillaume. http://www.telegraph-road.org |
From: Mark K. <mar...@at...> - 2002-11-25 00:58:12
|
Guillaume, ./configure now looks good now. make is in progress. Thanks, Mark On Sunday 24 November 2002 04:44 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > On Monday 25 November 2002 01:25, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > > On Sunday 24 November 2002 19:53, Mark Knecht wrote: > > > I think the Qt installed on my system is higher than the configure = step > > > is accepting? > > > > No, lower. You have 3.0.3, our framework now requires 3.1 (until I fi= x > > it). > > Should be fixed now. |
From: Mark K. <mar...@at...> - 2002-11-25 01:49:40
|
Guillaume, Hi. OK, so some of it is fixed. I can configure and compile, but once = again=20 I was not able to actually run the program. As a background reminder, I am running RH 7.3 built as per the PlanetC= CRMA=20 process. One caveat right now is that I am not able to run the low-latenc= y=20 kernel due to an incompatibility with my EIDE controller. (Apparently...)= =20 Also, this machine doesn't have a recognizable sound card in it yet, but = does=20 have MIDI, so I was hoping to run it as pure MIDI and pick up the audio f= rom=20 the other computer. (I think this isn't going to work...) Anyway, I grabbed about 1000 lines of output from the build process an= d=20 started studying. Pretty soon I noticed the following: make[2]: Entering directory `/root/rosegarden/gui' make[3]: Entering directory `/root/rosegarden/gui' /bin/sh ../admin/mkinstalldirs /opt/kde3/bin /bin/sh ../libtool --silent --mode=3Dinstall /usr/bin/install -c -p =20 rosegarden /opt/kde3/bin/rosegarden Indeed, I looked in /opt/kde3/bin and found the executables, both=20 rosegarden and rosegardensequencer. The read-me implies that I shouldn't = have=20 to do anything to get it to run, but my .bash files do not have a KDEDIRS= =20 export of any type I've found as of yet.=20 Now, the interesting part is that on my other machine here at home I'v= e=20 built Rosegarden successfully, but it resides in a more globally acceptab= le=20 /usr/bin directory. Is there yet another issue with this new configuration process that ha= s=20 changed whether we are supposed to make environment variables to run, or = is=20 something wrong and the execuatble is gettign placed in the wrong directo= ry? Also, will I be able to run at all with no audio card at this time? Al= l I=20 wanted to do was MIDI, then mix to an external mixer? RG complains that i= t=20 can't find jack, and right now jack can't run because this machien doesn'= t=20 have the hardware. Thanks, Mark On Sunday 24 November 2002 04:44 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > On Monday 25 November 2002 01:25, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > > On Sunday 24 November 2002 19:53, Mark Knecht wrote: > > > I think the Qt installed on my system is higher than the configure = step > > > is accepting? > > > > No, lower. You have 3.0.3, our framework now requires 3.1 (until I fi= x > > it). > > Should be fixed now. |
From: Chris C. <ca...@al...> - 2002-11-25 10:02:01
|
Mark Knecht wrote: > Indeed, I looked in /opt/kde3/bin and found the executables, both > rosegarden and rosegardensequencer. [...] on my other machine here at > home I've built Rosegarden successfully, but it resides in a more > globally acceptable /usr/bin directory. I usually keep KDE in /opt, but in my limited experience of installing on machines where the KDE stuff is in /usr, I've found Rosegarden was always too keen to put itself in /opt regardless. I assume that's entirely down to the KDE macros we've inherited. Giving /usr as the --prefix option to configure might work, I guess. > Also, will I be able to run at all with no audio card at this time? Should be fine, subject to the usual caveats about having a MIDI device that works in ALSA (I'm guessing it's a USB MIDI hub?) Chris |
From: Mark K. <mar...@at...> - 2002-11-25 12:42:57
|
Chris, You config comment is amazingly sensible. The INSTALL file says: =2E/configure --with-qt-dir=3D/usr/lib/qt3 --prefix=3D/opt/kde3 --with-al= sa=3Dyes Everything is in /opt/kde3/bin. I wonder why? ;-) ;-) I will rebuild, this time trying =2E/configure --with-qt-dir=3D/usr/lib/qt3 --prefix=3D/usr --with-alsa=3D= yes and see if I get better results. WRT the no audio card, yes it is a USB MIDI hub I was planning on using w= ith=20 this machine. Possibly I should build without alsa support for now? =2E/configure --with-qt-dir=3D/usr/lib/qt3 --prefix=3D/usr Thanks, Mark On Monday 25 November 2002 01:56 am, Chris Cannam wrote: > Mark Knecht wrote: > > Indeed, I looked in /opt/kde3/bin and found the executables, both > > rosegarden and rosegardensequencer. [...] on my other machine here at > > home I've built Rosegarden successfully, but it resides in a more > > globally acceptable /usr/bin directory. > > I usually keep KDE in /opt, but in my limited experience of installing > on machines where the KDE stuff is in /usr, I've found Rosegarden was > always too keen to put itself in /opt regardless. I assume that's > entirely down to the KDE macros we've inherited. > > Giving /usr as the --prefix option to configure might work, I guess. > > > Also, will I be able to run at all with no audio card at this time? > > Should be fine, subject to the usual caveats about having a MIDI > device that works in ALSA (I'm guessing it's a USB MIDI hub?) > > > Chris > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Rosegarden-user mailing list > Ros...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user |
From: Chris C. <ca...@al...> - 2002-11-25 12:54:47
|
Mark Knecht wrote: > WRT the no audio card, yes it is a USB MIDI hub I was planning on > using with this machine. If it's a device that ALSA supports then it should work with RG whether you have an audio card or not. At least give it a try, I'm pretty sure it'll work. > ./configure --with-qt-dir=/usr/lib/qt3 --prefix=/usr That would still build with ALSA, if you had the ALSA headers installed -- configure now defaults to ALSA unless you say --with-alsa=no. I think. Chris |
From: Mark K. <mk...@co...> - 2002-11-25 16:26:53
|
Chris, How would I come up with a list of available options for this configuration script? I see from another thread that there is an option to turn on aRTs MIDI. What else? ./configure --show_options ?? ;-) I think you're right about the alsa stuff being required. It wouldn't build on this new machine without LADSPA installed. Building again. Off to meeting. Mark -----Original Message----- From: ros...@li... [mailto:ros...@li...]On Behalf Of Chris Cannam Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 4:51 AM To: Mark Knecht Cc: Guillaume Laurent; ros...@li... Subject: Re: [Rosegarden-user] KDEDIRS export <SNIP> That would still build with ALSA, if you had the ALSA headers installed -- configure now defaults to ALSA unless you say --with-alsa=no. I think. Chris ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-user mailing list Ros...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user |
From: Mark K. <mar...@at...> - 2002-11-25 13:41:56
|
Chris, One step forward... I built with=20 =2E/configure --with-qt-dir=3D/usr/lib/qt3 --prefix=3D/usr and now rosegarden is found in /usr/bin, as expected, ut then I try runni= ng it=20 and I get a dialog box "Installation contains wrong version of Rosegarden= ". I click the details button and I am informed of the following: "The wrong versions of Rosegarden's data files were found in the standard= KDE=20 installation directories. (I an 4-0.8, but the installed files are for=20 version .)" It then goes on to talk about old versions in standard directories. With = that=20 clue I erase the earlier problem versions from /opt/kde3/bin, but that ha= s=20 not solved the problem. It also talks about setting KDEDIRS, which I trie= d as=20 /usr and /usr/bin, but that didn't solve anything. There must be other files that got installed somewhere in the earlier tri= es. What are they and WHERE are they? Thanks, Mark On Monday 25 November 2002 04:43 am, Mark Knecht wrote: > Chris, > You config comment is amazingly sensible. The INSTALL file says: > > ./configure --with-qt-dir=3D/usr/lib/qt3 --prefix=3D/opt/kde3 --with-al= sa=3Dyes > > Everything is in /opt/kde3/bin. I wonder why? ;-) ;-) > > I will rebuild, this time trying > > ./configure --with-qt-dir=3D/usr/lib/qt3 --prefix=3D/usr --with-alsa=3D= yes > > and see if I get better results. > > > WRT the no audio card, yes it is a USB MIDI hub I was planning on using > with this machine. Possibly I should build without alsa support for now= ? > > ./configure --with-qt-dir=3D/usr/lib/qt3 --prefix=3D/usr > > Thanks, > Mark > > On Monday 25 November 2002 01:56 am, Chris Cannam wrote: > > Mark Knecht wrote: > > > Indeed, I looked in /opt/kde3/bin and found the executables, both > > > rosegarden and rosegardensequencer. [...] on my other machine here = at > > > home I've built Rosegarden successfully, but it resides in a more > > > globally acceptable /usr/bin directory. > > > > I usually keep KDE in /opt, but in my limited experience of installin= g > > on machines where the KDE stuff is in /usr, I've found Rosegarden was > > always too keen to put itself in /opt regardless. I assume that's > > entirely down to the KDE macros we've inherited. > > > > Giving /usr as the --prefix option to configure might work, I guess. > > > > > Also, will I be able to run at all with no audio card at this time? > > > > Should be fine, subject to the usual caveats about having a MIDI > > device that works in ALSA (I'm guessing it's a USB MIDI hub?) > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > Rosegarden-user mailing list > > Ros...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Rosegarden-user mailing list > Ros...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user |
From: Chris C. <ca...@al...> - 2002-11-25 13:50:02
|
Mark Knecht wrote: > "The wrong versions of Rosegarden's data files were found in the standard KDE > installation directories. (I an 4-0.8, but the installed files are for > version .)" This is the bug that Miguel was reporting -- a change to the version numbering has broken one of my crappy scripts. The files were all installed, but the code doesn't realise because it's looking for a version number in them that's been mangled. According to the CVS log, Guillaume committed Miguel's fix for this about four hours ago. How old is your update? Chris |
From: Guillaume L. <gla...@te...> - 2002-11-25 13:55:55
|
On Monday 25 November 2002 14:46, Chris Cannam wrote: > Mark Knecht wrote: > > "The wrong versions of Rosegarden's data files were found in the standa= rd > > KDE installation directories. (I an 4-0.8, but the installed files are > > for version .)" > > This is the bug that Miguel was reporting -- a change to the version > numbering has broken one of my crappy scripts. Actually it's a change in the file from which your script was extracting th= e=20 version number (due to my update of the admin dir) not in the numbering=20 itself : two lines were matching the regexp instead of just one. =2D-=20 Guillaume http://www.telegraph-road.org |
From: Mark K. <mk...@co...> - 2002-11-25 14:58:25
|
Chris, My update was from last evening. I must have missed that new stuff was committed. I'll get a new download and try again. Thanks, Mark -----Original Message----- From: ros...@li... [mailto:ros...@li...]On Behalf Of Chris Cannam Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 5:46 AM To: Mark Knecht Cc: Guillaume Laurent; ros...@li... Subject: Re: [Rosegarden-user] KDEDIRS export Mark Knecht wrote: > "The wrong versions of Rosegarden's data files were found in the standard KDE > installation directories. (I an 4-0.8, but the installed files are for > version .)" This is the bug that Miguel was reporting -- a change to the version numbering has broken one of my crappy scripts. The files were all installed, but the code doesn't realise because it's looking for a version number in them that's been mangled. According to the CVS log, Guillaume committed Miguel's fix for this about four hours ago. How old is your update? Chris ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-user mailing list Ros...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user |
From: Mark K. <mk...@co...> - 2002-11-25 18:09:50
|
Chris, Bummer. Did an update from this mornings CVS. The results are worse than before. There is no /usr/bin/rosegarden, nor is there anything under /opt, not even a kde3 directory. Where did it go??? I did: make -f Makefile.cvs ./configure --with-qt-dir=/usr/lib/qt3 --prefix=/usr --with-alsa=yes make make install The biggest difference (for me) is that these last few builds have been under KDE instead of Gnome. Other than that I haven't changed anything. Just download CVS trees and go. What's going wrong? Mark -----Original Message----- From: ros...@li... [mailto:ros...@li...]On Behalf Of Mark Knecht Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 6:57 AM To: 'Chris Cannam' Cc: ros...@li... Subject: RE: [Rosegarden-user] KDEDIRS export Chris, My update was from last evening. I must have missed that new stuff was committed. I'll get a new download and try again. Thanks, Mark -----Original Message----- From: ros...@li... [mailto:ros...@li...]On Behalf Of Chris Cannam Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 5:46 AM To: Mark Knecht Cc: Guillaume Laurent; ros...@li... Subject: Re: [Rosegarden-user] KDEDIRS export Mark Knecht wrote: > "The wrong versions of Rosegarden's data files were found in the standard KDE > installation directories. (I an 4-0.8, but the installed files are for > version .)" This is the bug that Miguel was reporting -- a change to the version numbering has broken one of my crappy scripts. The files were all installed, but the code doesn't realise because it's looking for a version number in them that's been mangled. According to the CVS log, Guillaume committed Miguel's fix for this about four hours ago. How old is your update? Chris ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-user mailing list Ros...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-user mailing list Ros...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user |
From: Guillaume L. <gla...@te...> - 2002-11-25 18:12:57
|
On Monday 25 November 2002 19:08, Mark Knecht wrote: > Where did it go??? It should have gone in /usr/bin according to your config. Just look at what= =20 'make install' says. Try 'make -n install', it will just show the commands= =20 without actually executing them. =2D-=20 Guillaume http://www.telegraph-road.org |