From: Jani F. <j.f...@gm...> - 2009-11-29 07:25:43
|
Hi. There aren't many slots to restore. I was investigating slotAddDot() and slotAddDotNotationOnly(), but didn't find actions add_dot and add_notation_dot in *rc files. Are they obsolete? -Jani |
From: D. M. M. <mic...@ro...> - 2009-11-29 07:54:58
|
On Sunday 29 November 2009, Jani Frilander wrote: > Hi. > > There aren't many slots to restore. I was investigating slotAddDot() and > slotAddDotNotationOnly(), > but didn't find actions add_dot and add_notation_dot in *rc files. > > Are they obsolete? Uh.... No. They must be why hitting Ctrl+. to cycle dots on a selected note doesn't work. Good that you mentioned it and I thought about that, because I missed it in my big feature review, and this one is useful and important. No idea where they used to be, but with names like that, my first instinct is they might have been in EditView and shared between notation and matrix. The last batch of stuff I rescued was from EditView. I'm not going to look into it at the moment. Must sleep soon. -- D. Michael McIntyre |
From: D. M. M. <mic...@ro...> - 2009-11-30 01:52:51
|
On Sunday 29 November 2009, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: > I'm not going to look into it at the moment. Must sleep soon. Looks like Julie just missed these. There were a bunch of things created with KAction() calls and she moved all of that stuff into the .rc files to createAction() them with all the new stuff. These just look to have been overlooked, or even deleted by accident somewhere along the way. Who knows. Fixed. I added the more useful of the two actions to the group toolbar as well, for better exposure of this useful feature. It's not a group function, but who cares. I'm not creating a new toolbar for one action. So what do you think, Jani? Is this finally it? No. Ctrl+; or something is still broken. Set loop, or cancel loop. We should concentrate on knocking the rest of these out in the next few days so we can dump the attic/ directory. -- D. Michael McIntyre |
From: Julie S <msj...@ya...> - 2009-11-30 04:54:37
|
Dear Jani and Michael, Michael wrote: > Looks like Julie just missed these. There were a > bunch of things created with > KAction() calls and she moved all of that stuff into the > .rc files to > createAction() them with all the new stuff. These > just look to have been > overlooked, or even deleted by accident somewhere along the > way. Who knows. Thanks for the good work at salvaging that stuff. I tried hard to grab stuff and I dug around quite a bit (about this time a year ago actually). But with no running code -- 10,000 compile errors, there was just no way for a RG code newbie to have known all the things to look for. Aside: ------ Remember the days when we thought we would never get out of the mechanized conversion phase, or the time it felt like we would never get the thing to compile. Look at it now, and ask. What happened to my life? LOL! ... Great job folks. You have certainly saved RG from the scrap yard and extended its life considerably. Sincerely, Julie S. |
From: D. M. M. <mic...@ro...> - 2009-11-30 05:35:06
|
On Sunday 29 November 2009, Julie S wrote: > I tried hard to grab stuff and I dug around quite a bit (about this time a > year ago actually). But with no running code -- 10,000 compile errors, > there was just no way for a RG code newbie to have known all the things to > look for. The job you did with that stuff would have still qualified as fantastic if you hadn't been flying blind. Since you were completely in the dark at the time, it's pretty much mind blowing that it turned out as well as it did. It all turned out better than any of us could have expected in our most optimistic daydreams. > Remember the days when we thought we would never get out of the mechanized > conversion phase, or the time it felt like we would never get the thing to > compile. Yup. > Look at it now, and ask. What happened to my life? LOL! I know the feeling intimately. -- D. Michael McIntyre |
From: Jani F. <j.f...@gm...> - 2009-11-30 06:28:23
|
2009/11/30 D. Michael McIntyre <mic...@ro...> > > So what do you think, Jani? Is this finally it? > Looks good. Seems like we're going to get it finished by February. > > No. Ctrl+; or something is still broken. Set loop, or cancel loop. We > should concentrate on knocking the rest of these out in the next few days > so > we can dump the attic/ directory. > > Why to hurry? But now I must hurry to work. -Jani |