From: Emanuel R. <xb...@gm...> - 2008-09-26 20:24:12
|
Hi Less than 2000 errors now ! Best Regards, Emanuel |
From: D. M. M. <ros...@gm...> - 2008-09-27 03:23:53
|
On Friday 26 September 2008, Emanuel Rumpf wrote: > Less than 2000 errors now ! I only count 864, and more than 76% compiling! Please do keep up the excellent work! -- D. Michael McIntyre |
From: Yves G. <yc....@wa...> - 2008-09-27 07:47:32
|
On Saturday 27 September 2008 05:23:41 D. Michael McIntyre wrote: > On Friday 26 September 2008, Emanuel Rumpf wrote: > > Less than 2000 errors now ! > > I only count 864, and more than 76% compiling! I count 1759 errors and 58% compiling with rev. 9437 Why such a difference ? Yves |
From: Chris C. <ca...@al...> - 2008-09-27 08:29:12
|
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Yves Guillemot <yc....@wa...> wrote: > On Saturday 27 September 2008 05:23:41 D. Michael McIntyre wrote: >> On Friday 26 September 2008, Emanuel Rumpf wrote: >> > Less than 2000 errors now ! >> >> I only count 864, and more than 76% compiling! > > I count 1759 errors and 58% compiling with rev. 9437 > Why such a difference ? Do you have the RosegardenTransport uic-generated header file? If you're using qt4-makefile, that's one thing it doesn't do for you, I think -- I had to generate it by hand. I can't remember the details right now though (not in front of a suitable terminal). I'm pretty sure the compiling %age was more like 70-something than 50-something for me as well, last time I checked. The number of errors of course could depend on the compiler version and all sorts of other things -- it's not like the error count is an exhaustive enumeration of all the errors that are actually in a file or anything. Chris |
From: Yves G. <yc....@wa...> - 2008-09-27 08:59:55
|
On Saturday 27 September 2008 10:29:00 Chris Cannam wrote: > Do you have the RosegardenTransport uic-generated header file? Thanks Chris, I don't : this should explain the difference. Yves |
From: Yves G. <yc....@wa...> - 2008-09-28 20:49:57
|
> On Saturday 27 September 2008 10:29:00 Chris Cannam wrote: > > Do you have the RosegardenTransport uic-generated header file? > I tried to create it with /usr/lib/qt4/bin/uic -o src/ui_RosegardenTransport.h \ src/gui/ui/RosegardenTransport.ui but I don't get any new file compiling. Did I miss something ? Yves |
From: Emanuel R. <xb...@gm...> - 2008-09-28 22:40:32
|
2008/9/28 Yves Guillemot <yc....@wa...>: >> On Saturday 27 September 2008 10:29:00 Chris Cannam wrote: >> > Do you have the RosegardenTransport uic-generated header file? >> > > I tried to create it with > > /usr/lib/qt4/bin/uic -o src/ui_RosegardenTransport.h \ > src/gui/ui/RosegardenTransport.ui > > but I don't get any new file compiling. > > Did I miss something ? > qt4-makefile still uses the old naming scheme, I think. use cmake the name changed to ui_RosegardenTransport.h for the cmake build at least, I'm not sure here for the qt4-makefile cmake should autogenerate the h file. the generated h file (in RGbuild directory) is slightly invalid. after you have generated it, change it as described below. Another tip here in case anyone didn't knew: cmake . -DWANT_DEBUG=yes -G KDevelop3 Will generate a project file that can be opened and build with KDevelop3 ui_RosegardenTransport.h - generated file is invalid: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- looks like: class Ui_RosegardenTransport { -------------------------- but should be: -------------------------- class Ui_RosegardenTransport : public QFrame { Q_OBJECT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
From: Yves G. <yc....@wa...> - 2008-09-29 20:35:11
|
On Sunday 28 September 2008 23:32:33 Emanuel Rumpf wrote: > the name changed to ui_RosegardenTransport.h > for the cmake build at least, I'm not sure here for the qt4-makefile The qt4-makefile doesn't generate that file and therefore doesn't give any name to it. I created it by hand, without modifying the makefile. > > class Ui_RosegardenTransport > { > > > -------------------------- > but should be: > -------------------------- > > class Ui_RosegardenTransport : public QFrame > { > Q_OBJECT Thanks for that point, Emmanuel. I did this modification, but gained only a handful of errors and again not any new file compiling. I currently have 338 .o files compiling from 579 .cpp files : 58% compiled. It's far less than Michael's 76% (about a hundred files) and I don't see lots of errors related to the transport. It sounds weird, nevertheless I'm not really in a hurry to solve that problem as I still have lots of other errors to fix before. Yves |
From: D. M. M. <ros...@gm...> - 2008-09-29 04:24:10
|
On Sunday 28 September 2008, Emanuel Rumpf wrote: > qt4-makefile still uses the old naming scheme, I think. > use cmake If I use CMake, I only get 30% compiling, which basically hasn't ever changed the whole time we've had a working build system in the qt4 branch. (Well, I haven't tried that for a week or so. Let's see... Up to 40% now.) > > but I don't get any new file compiling. > > > > Did I miss something ? If it's not the transport stuff, it could be all the missing .moc files, Yves. This is only a bandaid on the real problem, but I got rid of hundreds of .moc-related errors by creating dummy .moc files When I build with make -f qt4-makefile (grepping the output for "error" and doing some simple calculations from there with wc) I get: Total source files: 579 Compiled obj. files: 447 Percent compiled: 77 Total errors: 883 -- D. Michael McIntyre |
From: Yves G. <yc....@wa...> - 2008-10-04 21:15:49
|
What happened to the mailing lists ? I now just received about twenty mails sent days ago... On Monday 29 September 2008 06:24:01 D. Michael McIntyre wrote: > If it's not the transport stuff, it could be all the missing .moc files, Yes, some .moc files are missing, but I eventually found the main problem : I didn't add the -DQT3_SUPPORT flag in the makefile. > Total source files: 579 > Compiled obj. files: 447 > Percent compiled: 77 > Total errors: 883 I now get 412 obj files (71%) and 1014 errors Yves |
From: Julie S <msj...@ya...> - 2008-10-04 23:30:21
|
Yves wrote: > What happened to the mailing lists ? > I now just received about twenty mails sent days ago... me too. I thought everybody was quite, but it appears I messed most of the dialog surrounding the coding of menus and toolbars. It all just popped up today--and not all at one time either. Sincerely, Julie S. |
From: Chris C. <ca...@al...> - 2008-10-05 11:20:59
|
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Julie S <msj...@ya...> wrote: > Yves wrote: >> What happened to the mailing lists ? >> I now just received about twenty mails sent days ago... > > me too. Same here. I certainly have been getting some list mail during the last few days, but perhaps it was just stuff that was also cc'd to me. Hmph. Chris |