From: Brian P. <bri...@in...> - 2013-09-03 22:21:39
|
Hmm, looking at the changes to the OBO for the "retention time s" item I'm not sure I like what I see: def: "OBSOLETE Retention time of the spectrum from the source file." [PSI:PI] comment: This term was made obsolete because scan start time (MS:1000016) should be used instead. It seems like an error to insist that chromatography and mass spec analysis always take place in the same time frame. Or am I misunderstanding something? On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Brian Pratt <bri...@in...>wrote: > So I went to update cv.hpp/cpp for use with some new data compression > patches that were submitted. Wow, lots of action there, kind of a can of > worms. Much of it is just small name changes: > MS_search_engine_specific_score_for_peptides = 1001143 > changes to > MS_search_engine_specific_score_for_PSMs = 1001143 > and > MS_modification_specificity_N_term > changes to > MS_modification_specificity_peptide_N_term > etc. So just a lot of editing the pwiz code to match the new names. Kind > of annoying, no worse. > > In particular, though: > MS_retention_time_s_ = 1001114, > changes to > MS_retention_time_s__OBSOLETE = 1001114 > makes me a bit queasy - just tossing the word OBSOLETE into > pwiz\data\identdata\Serializer_pepXML.cpp creeps me out. Or does this > actually reflect the state of pepXML, that is, obsolete? > > Brian > |