From: Mark D. <the...@us...> - 2005-08-01 21:49:18
|
Based on the description at http://gentoo-wiki.com/Stack_smash_protection This sounds like a pretty good idea. Are there any objections to adding this to our gaim.spec.in? -Mark ---------- Forwarded Message ----------- From: bug...@re... Subject: [Bug 164827] New: Add -fstack-protector-all to cflags after $RPM_OPT_FLAGS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=164827 Summary: Add -fstack-protector-all to cflags after $RPM_OPT_FLAGS Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: gaim AssignedTo: wt...@re... ReportedBy: so...@re... CC: ebl...@cs...,lsc...@us...,redhat- bugzilla@six-by- nine.com.au,st...@no...,the...@us...urcefor ge.net,wt...@re... From Uli: > And again the note for our friends gaim, ethereal, (mjcox: extend the > list, please): change the Makefiles or .spec files to add > -fstack-protector-all after the RPM_OPT_FLAGS to unconditionally add the > canary support in all functions. This is not really slow either but > will help catching problems. |
From: Mark D. <ma...@ki...> - 2005-08-12 02:14:52
|
Stu pointed out that this option isn't supported on many compilers, so we decided NOT to add it to our spec file. -Mark On Mon, 1 Aug 2005 16:49:14 -0500, Mark Doliner wrote > Based on the description at > http://gentoo-wiki.com/Stack_smash_protection > This sounds like a pretty good idea. Are there any objections to > adding this to our gaim.spec.in? -Mark > > ---------- Forwarded Message ----------- > From: bug...@re... > Subject: [Bug 164827] New: Add -fstack-protector-all to cflags after > $RPM_OPT_FLAGS > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=164827 > > Summary: Add -fstack-protector-all to cflags after $RPM_OPT_FLAGS > Product: Fedora Core > Version: devel > Platform: All > OS/Version: Linux > Status: NEW > Severity: normal > Priority: normal > Component: gaim > AssignedTo: wt...@re... > ReportedBy: so...@re... > CC: ebl...@cs...,lsc...@us..., > redhat- bugzilla@six-by- > nine.com.au,st...@no...,the...@us...urcefor > ge.net,wt...@re... > > From Uli: > > > And again the note for our friends gaim, ethereal, (mjcox: extend the > > list, please): change the Makefiles or .spec files to add > > -fstack-protector-all after the RPM_OPT_FLAGS to unconditionally add the > > canary support in all functions. This is not really slow either but > > will help catching problems. |