partclone-user Mailing List for Partclone (Page 3)
Brought to you by:
thomas_tsai
Menu
▾
▴
partclone-user — partclone user mailing list
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 |
Jan
(24) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(4) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2024 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Thomas <th...@nc...> - 2010-01-05 03:08:49
|
Hello, I need more time to check the problem. I can't reproduce your error(64K). I tried to format ntfs partition with 64K, partclone backup well(no free error) and successfully restore. I will release a debug version later, could you help me do some test? Thanks you. Thomas. On 12/30/2009 06:59 AM, Javor wrote: > Hi, > > I'm facing error on attempt to create image with partclone.ntfs of a > 64K ntfs partition. Error in general is like follows: > partclone.ntfs -s /dev/sda5 -o testimg.partclone -L partclone.log -d2 > -c>partclone.out 2>partclone.out.err > *** glibc detected *** partclone.ntfs: double free or corruption > (!prev): 0x088b90e8 *** > > Finally no image is created (empty file). > > Look at attachments for more detailed output; .script file shows the > used command-line parameters and related error. > > Problem has been reproduced with: > * [partclone-test-1] Current stable binary from drbl repository "deb > http://free.nchc.org.tw/drbl-core drbl stable" (Rev: 323M) > * [partclone-test-2] Current svn revision (Rev 444). Compiled as per > http://partclone.nchc.org.tw/wiki/InstallfromSourceCode ("Advanced > easy way") on top of up-to date stable lenny (5.0.3); kernel > 2.6.26-2-686 > * [partclone-test-3] clonezilla-live CD 1.2.2-31. This is Partclone > v0.1.9 (Rev:323M). > * [partclone-test-4] same as "test-1" + strace output > * clonezilla-live CD 1.2.2-26 > > > No errors with other ntfs partitions where cluster size is the default > 4k. The problematic partition (sda5) is 7008MB containing just a > paging file of windows XP. Maybe the problem is the non-default > cluster size (64k). Same (sda5) partition could be successfully > processed by ntfsclone (contained in clonezilla live 1.2.2-31). > > Regards, > Javor > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community > Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support > A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy > Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers > http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > Partclone-user mailing list > Par...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/partclone-user -- Thomas, 蔡育欽 國家高速網路與計算中心 格網技術組 專案助理研究員 thomas at nchc org tw pub key 46379ACF fingerprint = 7BB2 2103 CADC 59F6 11D5 BCB3 5E97 22B4 4637 9ACF |
|
From: Javor <nik...@gm...> - 2009-12-29 23:00:05
|
Hi, I'm facing error on attempt to create image with partclone.ntfs of a 64K ntfs partition. Error in general is like follows: partclone.ntfs -s /dev/sda5 -o testimg.partclone -L partclone.log -d2 -c >partclone.out 2>partclone.out.err *** glibc detected *** partclone.ntfs: double free or corruption (!prev): 0x088b90e8 *** Finally no image is created (empty file). Look at attachments for more detailed output; .script file shows the used command-line parameters and related error. Problem has been reproduced with: * [partclone-test-1] Current stable binary from drbl repository "deb http://free.nchc.org.tw/drbl-core drbl stable" (Rev: 323M) * [partclone-test-2] Current svn revision (Rev 444). Compiled as per http://partclone.nchc.org.tw/wiki/InstallfromSourceCode ("Advanced easy way") on top of up-to date stable lenny (5.0.3); kernel 2.6.26-2-686 * [partclone-test-3] clonezilla-live CD 1.2.2-31. This is Partclone v0.1.9 (Rev:323M). * [partclone-test-4] same as "test-1" + strace output * clonezilla-live CD 1.2.2-26 No errors with other ntfs partitions where cluster size is the default 4k. The problematic partition (sda5) is 7008MB containing just a paging file of windows XP. Maybe the problem is the non-default cluster size (64k). Same (sda5) partition could be successfully processed by ntfsclone (contained in clonezilla live 1.2.2-31). Regards, Javor |
|
From: M S <bmw...@ho...> - 2009-11-24 17:42:03
|
Hi, I am testing partclone as part of Clonezilla program. I am using device-image and savedisk option. Getting the following error message: Partclone v0.1.9 (Rev:323M) http://partclone.org Starting to clone device (/dev/sda1) to image (-) Reading Super Block Filesystem isn't in valid state. May be it is not cleanly unmounted. Parclone fail, please check /var/log/partclone.log ! Checking the disk space... (standard_in) 1: syntax error Something went wrong!!! Press "Enter" to continue...... Contents of /var/log/partclone.log: Partclone v0.1.9 (Rev:323M) http://partclone.org Starting to clone device (/dev/sda2) to image (-) Reading Super Block Filesystem isn't in valid state. May be it is not cleanly unmounted. I am using Clonezilla live which is on the hard drive and booting from it. Thanks. |
|
From: Thomas <th...@nc...> - 2009-10-14 02:03:16
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Thank you for report the problem details. Could you also run dumpe2fs for the testing? I need the results to compare with partclone log file. and the version of e2fslibs. about partclone log file Please run partclone.extfs -d3 -c -s /dev/sda8 -o ./test.img and check /var/log/partclone.log which is a big log file, please compress and mail to me. I also try to rebuild your environment to check the problem latter. Best Regards, Thomas. Oliver Winker wrote: > Hello, > > I'm using partclone to make backups of my ext4 partitions. Works really great > until now! > > Now recently I've resized the ext4 partitions, and since then partclone.ext4 > bails with error "extfsclone.c: bitmap erroe at 86 group": > --- > gamix:~/Test# partclone-0.1.9/src/partclone.extfs -c -s /dev/sda8 -o ./test.img > Partclone v0.1.9 (Rev:exported) http://partclone.org > Starting to clone device (/dev/sda8) to image (./test.img) > Reading Super Block > Calculating bitmap... > Elapsed: 00:00:01, Remaining: 00:00:00, Completed: 87.07%, Rate: 171.00MB/min, > extfsclone.c: bitmap erroe at 86 group. > Partclone fail, please check /var/log/partclone.log ! > --- > > * /var/log/partclone.log > --- > gamix:~/Test# cat /var/log/partclone.log > Partclone v0.1.9 (Rev:exported) http://partclone.org > Starting to clone device (/dev/sda8) to image (./test.img) > Reading Super Block > Calculating bitmap... > extfsclone.c: bitmap erroe at 86 group. > --- > > It's the partclone version "partclone-0.1.9": > --- > ./configure --enable-ntfs --enable-fat --enable-extfs > --- > gamix:~/Test# ldd partclone-0.1.9/src/partclone.extfs > linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb76f5000) > libext2fs.so.2 => /lib/libext2fs.so.2 (0xb76a7000) > libcom_err.so.2 => /lib/libcom_err.so.2 (0xb76a4000) > libpthread.so.0 => /lib/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 (0xb768a000) > libc.so.6 => /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0xb752b000) > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb76f6000) > gamix:~/Test# ls -la /lib/libext2fs.so.2 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 2009-08-28 21:08 /lib/libext2fs.so.2 -> > libext2fs.so.2.4 > --- > > Below still some more additional infos. > > Would be great if this could be fixed. Just let me know for additional infos and > testing. > > Best Regards, Oliver > > --- > * gamix:~# uname -a > Linux gamix 2.6.31.3 #1 SMP Thu Oct 8 19:25:38 CEST 2009 i686 GNU/Linux > --- > * Filesystem is clean: > > gamix:~/Test# fsck.ext4 -f /dev/sda8 > e2fsck 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009) > Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes > Pass 2: Checking directory structure > Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity > Pass 4: Checking reference counts > Pass 5: Checking group summary information > /dev/sda8: 232258/811200 files (2.7% non-contiguous), 1738136/3273235 blocks > --- > * gamix:~# tune2fs -l /dev/sda8 > > tune2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009) > Filesystem volume name: <none> > Last mounted on: <not available> > Filesystem UUID: b23b79b7-bd29-4b45-a502-8243f4423f51 > Filesystem magic number: 0xEF53 > Filesystem revision #: 1 (dynamic) > Filesystem features: has_journal ext_attr resize_inode dir_index filetype > extent sparse_super large_file uninit_bg > Filesystem flags: signed_directory_hash > Default mount options: (none) > Filesystem state: clean > Errors behavior: Continue > Filesystem OS type: Linux > Inode count: 811200 > Block count: 3273235 > Reserved block count: 163661 > Free blocks: 1535099 > Free inodes: 578942 > First block: 0 > Block size: 4096 > Fragment size: 4096 > Reserved GDT blocks: 625 > Blocks per group: 32768 > Fragments per group: 32768 > Inodes per group: 8112 > Inode blocks per group: 507 > Filesystem created: Mon Mar 10 20:31:44 2008 > Last mount time: Sat Oct 10 09:51:55 2009 > Last write time: Sat Oct 10 10:40:06 2009 > Mount count: 0 > Maximum mount count: -1 > Last checked: Sat Oct 10 10:40:06 2009 > Check interval: 0 (<none>) > Lifetime writes: 22 GB > Reserved blocks uid: 0 (user root) > Reserved blocks gid: 0 (group root) > First inode: 11 > Inode size: 256 > Journal inode: 8 > Default directory hash: tea > Directory Hash Seed: 436636ec-ce5b-4bea-9cc1-01971ea648a0 > Journal backup: inode blocks > --- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA > is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your > developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay > ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference > _______________________________________________ > Partclone-user mailing list > Par...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/partclone-user - -- Thomas, 蔡育欽 國家高速網路與計算中心 格網技術組 專案助理研究員 thomas at nchc org tw pub key 46379ACF fingerprint = 7BB2 2103 CADC 59F6 11D5 BCB3 5E97 22B4 4637 9ACF -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkrVKvkACgkQXpcitEY3ms/2tACdHwf/6xj1//Eq/EN+L0WSh62Q qDQAn3EEA3rdXE7eWVZGA+8d4cQw0Zrp =8hYZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Oliver W. <ol...@us...> - 2009-10-13 18:54:56
|
Hello, I'm using partclone to make backups of my ext4 partitions. Works really great until now! Now recently I've resized the ext4 partitions, and since then partclone.ext4 bails with error "extfsclone.c: bitmap erroe at 86 group": --- gamix:~/Test# partclone-0.1.9/src/partclone.extfs -c -s /dev/sda8 -o ./test.img Partclone v0.1.9 (Rev:exported) http://partclone.org Starting to clone device (/dev/sda8) to image (./test.img) Reading Super Block Calculating bitmap... Elapsed: 00:00:01, Remaining: 00:00:00, Completed: 87.07%, Rate: 171.00MB/min, extfsclone.c: bitmap erroe at 86 group. Partclone fail, please check /var/log/partclone.log ! --- * /var/log/partclone.log --- gamix:~/Test# cat /var/log/partclone.log Partclone v0.1.9 (Rev:exported) http://partclone.org Starting to clone device (/dev/sda8) to image (./test.img) Reading Super Block Calculating bitmap... extfsclone.c: bitmap erroe at 86 group. --- It's the partclone version "partclone-0.1.9": --- ./configure --enable-ntfs --enable-fat --enable-extfs --- gamix:~/Test# ldd partclone-0.1.9/src/partclone.extfs linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb76f5000) libext2fs.so.2 => /lib/libext2fs.so.2 (0xb76a7000) libcom_err.so.2 => /lib/libcom_err.so.2 (0xb76a4000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 (0xb768a000) libc.so.6 => /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0xb752b000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb76f6000) gamix:~/Test# ls -la /lib/libext2fs.so.2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 2009-08-28 21:08 /lib/libext2fs.so.2 -> libext2fs.so.2.4 --- Below still some more additional infos. Would be great if this could be fixed. Just let me know for additional infos and testing. Best Regards, Oliver --- * gamix:~# uname -a Linux gamix 2.6.31.3 #1 SMP Thu Oct 8 19:25:38 CEST 2009 i686 GNU/Linux --- * Filesystem is clean: gamix:~/Test# fsck.ext4 -f /dev/sda8 e2fsck 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009) Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Pass 2: Checking directory structure Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference counts Pass 5: Checking group summary information /dev/sda8: 232258/811200 files (2.7% non-contiguous), 1738136/3273235 blocks --- * gamix:~# tune2fs -l /dev/sda8 tune2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009) Filesystem volume name: <none> Last mounted on: <not available> Filesystem UUID: b23b79b7-bd29-4b45-a502-8243f4423f51 Filesystem magic number: 0xEF53 Filesystem revision #: 1 (dynamic) Filesystem features: has_journal ext_attr resize_inode dir_index filetype extent sparse_super large_file uninit_bg Filesystem flags: signed_directory_hash Default mount options: (none) Filesystem state: clean Errors behavior: Continue Filesystem OS type: Linux Inode count: 811200 Block count: 3273235 Reserved block count: 163661 Free blocks: 1535099 Free inodes: 578942 First block: 0 Block size: 4096 Fragment size: 4096 Reserved GDT blocks: 625 Blocks per group: 32768 Fragments per group: 32768 Inodes per group: 8112 Inode blocks per group: 507 Filesystem created: Mon Mar 10 20:31:44 2008 Last mount time: Sat Oct 10 09:51:55 2009 Last write time: Sat Oct 10 10:40:06 2009 Mount count: 0 Maximum mount count: -1 Last checked: Sat Oct 10 10:40:06 2009 Check interval: 0 (<none>) Lifetime writes: 22 GB Reserved blocks uid: 0 (user root) Reserved blocks gid: 0 (group root) First inode: 11 Inode size: 256 Journal inode: 8 Default directory hash: tea Directory Hash Seed: 436636ec-ce5b-4bea-9cc1-01971ea648a0 Journal backup: inode blocks --- |
|
From: Andreas W. <and...@gm...> - 2009-07-01 18:22:15
|
Hi, On 01.07.2009 19:30, thomas wrote: > Hello, > > Could you try ntfs-3g which work well for me. > like: > ntfs-3g -o loop sda1 /mnt Indeed, it works perfectly fine with ntfs-3g. Thank you a lot for the hint! Bye, Andreas > decompress image and pipe to partclone... > gunzip -d sda1.ntfs-ptcl-img.gz -c| partclone.ntfs -r -s - -O sda1 -C > ... > Cloned successfully. > > mount fail... > root@T-laptop:/home/partimag/xp-c-img# mount -o loop sda1 /mnt/ > Failed to read last sector (4096511): > HINTS: Either the volume is a RAID/LDM but it wasn't setup yet, > or it was not setup correctly (e.g. by not using mdadm --build ...), > or a wrong device is tried to be mounted, > or the partition table is corrupt (partition is smaller than NTFS), > or the NTFS boot sector is corrupt (NTFS size is not valid). > Failed to mount '/dev/loop0': > The device '/dev/loop0' doesn't seem to have a valid NTFS. > Maybe the wrong device is used? Or the whole disk instead of a > partition (e.g. /dev/sda, not /dev/sda1)? Or the other way around? > > but ntfs-3g is great! > root@T-laptop:/home/partimag/xp-c-img# ntfs-3g -o loop sda1 /mnt/ > root@T-laptop:/home/partimag/xp-c-img# cd /mnt/ > root@T-laptop:/mnt# ls > AUTOEXEC.BAT Documents and Settings ntldr WINDOWS > bootfont.bin IO.SYS Program Files > boot.ini MSDOS.SYS sanbootconf-latest > CONFIG.SYS NTDETECT.COM System Volume Information > > > Thomas. > > Andreas Winkelbauer Ð0: >> Hi, > >> I used clonezilla-live-1.2.2-14 (which uses partclone.ntfs v0.1.0, >> Rev:243:245M) to backup the disk of my notebook. I used the default >> settings, except for the compression (I disabled compression). > >> My system is dual boot Linux and Windows XP. > >> When I tried to restore the image to a file, using partclone v0.1.0 >> (Rev:217M), I was unable to mount it. > >> This is what I tried: > >> $ touch sda1.img >> $ partclone.restore -C -s sda1.ntfs-ptcl-img.uncomp -o sda1.img >> # mount -t ntfs -o loop,nosuid,nodev sda1.img /mnt/test > >> yielding the following error: > >> Failed to read last sector (204812608): Invalid argument >> HINTS: Either the volume is a RAID/LDM but it wasn't setup yet, >> or it was not setup correctly (e.g. by not using mdadm --build ...), >> or a wrong device is tried to be mounted, >> or the partition table is corrupt (partition is smaller than NTFS), >> or the NTFS boot sector is corrupt (NTFS size is not valid). >> Failed to mount '/dev/loop1': Invalid argument >> The device '/dev/loop1' doesn't seem to have a valid NTFS. >> Maybe the wrong device is used? Or the whole disk instead of a >> partition (e.g. /dev/sda, not /dev/sda1)? Or the other way around? > >> I have attached more, hopefully relevant, information. > >> Any hints? > >> Best regards, >> Andreas |
|
From: thomas <th...@nc...> - 2009-07-01 17:34:29
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Did you mean fail to mount? Please try ntfs-3g... If you restore to real partition fail, please add -d option and report log file to me. Thanks Thomas. Andreas Winkelbauer 提到: > Hi, > >> I used clonezilla-live-1.2.2-14 (which uses partclone.ntfs v0.1.0, >> Rev:243:245M) to backup the disk of my notebook. I used the default >> settings, except for the compression (I disabled compression). > > I just retried it with clonezilla-live-1.2.2-23 and partclone.ntfs > v0.1.1, Rev:304M. partclone.restore was the latest version from svn. It > still did not work. So it seems to be a current issue. > > Bye, > Andreas > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Partclone-user mailing list > Par...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/partclone-user - -- Thomas, 蔡育欽 國家高速網路與計算中心 格網技術組 專案助理研究員 thomas at nchc org tw pub key 46379ACF fingerprint = 7BB2 2103 CADC 59F6 11D5 BCB3 5E97 22B4 4637 9ACF -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkpLniwACgkQXpcitEY3ms92rwCeNjVIkOhyYHJDNpcaoNyZXKH+ HWYAoO80SzYh1BfiVARWtzW3g5e+7DsN =xEqT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: thomas <th...@nc...> - 2009-07-01 17:30:59
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, Could you try ntfs-3g which work well for me. like: ntfs-3g -o loop sda1 /mnt decompress image and pipe to partclone... gunzip -d sda1.ntfs-ptcl-img.gz -c| partclone.ntfs -r -s - -O sda1 -C ... Cloned successfully. mount fail... root@T-laptop:/home/partimag/xp-c-img# mount -o loop sda1 /mnt/ Failed to read last sector (4096511): HINTS: Either the volume is a RAID/LDM but it wasn't setup yet, or it was not setup correctly (e.g. by not using mdadm --build ...), or a wrong device is tried to be mounted, or the partition table is corrupt (partition is smaller than NTFS), or the NTFS boot sector is corrupt (NTFS size is not valid). Failed to mount '/dev/loop0': The device '/dev/loop0' doesn't seem to have a valid NTFS. Maybe the wrong device is used? Or the whole disk instead of a partition (e.g. /dev/sda, not /dev/sda1)? Or the other way around? but ntfs-3g is great! root@T-laptop:/home/partimag/xp-c-img# ntfs-3g -o loop sda1 /mnt/ root@T-laptop:/home/partimag/xp-c-img# cd /mnt/ root@T-laptop:/mnt# ls AUTOEXEC.BAT Documents and Settings ntldr WINDOWS bootfont.bin IO.SYS Program Files boot.ini MSDOS.SYS sanbootconf-latest CONFIG.SYS NTDETECT.COM System Volume Information Thomas. Andreas Winkelbauer 提到: > Hi, > > I used clonezilla-live-1.2.2-14 (which uses partclone.ntfs v0.1.0, > Rev:243:245M) to backup the disk of my notebook. I used the default > settings, except for the compression (I disabled compression). > > My system is dual boot Linux and Windows XP. > > When I tried to restore the image to a file, using partclone v0.1.0 > (Rev:217M), I was unable to mount it. > > This is what I tried: > > $ touch sda1.img > $ partclone.restore -C -s sda1.ntfs-ptcl-img.uncomp -o sda1.img > # mount -t ntfs -o loop,nosuid,nodev sda1.img /mnt/test > > yielding the following error: > > Failed to read last sector (204812608): Invalid argument > HINTS: Either the volume is a RAID/LDM but it wasn't setup yet, > or it was not setup correctly (e.g. by not using mdadm --build ...), > or a wrong device is tried to be mounted, > or the partition table is corrupt (partition is smaller than NTFS), > or the NTFS boot sector is corrupt (NTFS size is not valid). > Failed to mount '/dev/loop1': Invalid argument > The device '/dev/loop1' doesn't seem to have a valid NTFS. > Maybe the wrong device is used? Or the whole disk instead of a > partition (e.g. /dev/sda, not /dev/sda1)? Or the other way around? > > I have attached more, hopefully relevant, information. > > Any hints? > > Best regards, > Andreas > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Partclone-user mailing list > Par...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/partclone-user - -- Thomas, 蔡育欽 國家高速網路與計算中心 格網技術組 專案助理研究員 thomas at nchc org tw pub key 46379ACF fingerprint = 7BB2 2103 CADC 59F6 11D5 BCB3 5E97 22B4 4637 9ACF -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkpLnSYACgkQXpcitEY3ms91bACfTXMc8G3hhFUbo7i02zI6fxLq EkIAnAsxyIjpw8JWbNmrVFiPq/eLikMF =5te/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Andreas W. <and...@gm...> - 2009-07-01 16:42:51
|
Hi, > I used clonezilla-live-1.2.2-14 (which uses partclone.ntfs v0.1.0, > Rev:243:245M) to backup the disk of my notebook. I used the default > settings, except for the compression (I disabled compression). I just retried it with clonezilla-live-1.2.2-23 and partclone.ntfs v0.1.1, Rev:304M. partclone.restore was the latest version from svn. It still did not work. So it seems to be a current issue. Bye, Andreas |
|
From: Thomas <th...@nc...> - 2009-07-01 01:13:21
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Yes, I found the bug, too. Please check out the latest version. svn co http://partclone.nchc.org.tw/pub/partclone/partclone/ I will update it ASAP. Thanks Thomas. Andreas Winkelbauer wrote: > Hi, > > when I try to run configure with recent versions of partclone (tested > with latest svn version and with partclone-0.1.1) I get the following error: > > configure: checking for NTFS Library and Header files ... ... > checking ntfs/version.h usability... yes > checking ntfs/version.h presence... yes > checking for ntfs/version.h... yes > checking version of libntfs... /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lntfs > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > ./configure: line 8851: ./get_lib_version: No such file or directory > ./configure: line 8852: ./get_lib_version: No such file or directory > ./configure: line 8853: ./get_lib_version: No such file or directory > ?:?:?; bad > configure: error: Please check your libntfs! > > I had no problems building partclone-0.1.0-2 (from sourceforge). > > I am using Fedora 10. The following NTFS related packages are installed: > > $ rpm -qa|grep -i ntfs > ntfsprogs-gnomevfs-2.0.0-9.fc10.i386 > ntfsprogs-2.0.0-9.fc10.i386 > ntfsprogs-devel-2.0.0-9.fc10.i386 > ntfs-3g-devel-2009.4.4-1.fc10.i386 > ntfs-3g-2009.4.4-1.fc10.i386 > > Any hints? > > Best regards, > Andreas > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Partclone-user mailing list > Par...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/partclone-user - -- Thomas, 蔡育欽 國家高速網路與計算中心 格網技術組 專案助理研究員 thomas at nchc org tw pub key 46379ACF fingerprint = 7BB2 2103 CADC 59F6 11D5 BCB3 5E97 22B4 4637 9ACF -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkpKq5EACgkQXpcitEY3ms/YmgCdHJ41NtqXRG+EZhesiNftESOB EgkAn2h8OtunPpUe6VtrwHPNC2mAVWtQ =2kNH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Andreas W. <and...@gm...> - 2009-06-30 15:45:52
|
Hi, I used clonezilla-live-1.2.2-14 (which uses partclone.ntfs v0.1.0, Rev:243:245M) to backup the disk of my notebook. I used the default settings, except for the compression (I disabled compression). My system is dual boot Linux and Windows XP. When I tried to restore the image to a file, using partclone v0.1.0 (Rev:217M), I was unable to mount it. This is what I tried: $ touch sda1.img $ partclone.restore -C -s sda1.ntfs-ptcl-img.uncomp -o sda1.img # mount -t ntfs -o loop,nosuid,nodev sda1.img /mnt/test yielding the following error: Failed to read last sector (204812608): Invalid argument HINTS: Either the volume is a RAID/LDM but it wasn't setup yet, or it was not setup correctly (e.g. by not using mdadm --build ...), or a wrong device is tried to be mounted, or the partition table is corrupt (partition is smaller than NTFS), or the NTFS boot sector is corrupt (NTFS size is not valid). Failed to mount '/dev/loop1': Invalid argument The device '/dev/loop1' doesn't seem to have a valid NTFS. Maybe the wrong device is used? Or the whole disk instead of a partition (e.g. /dev/sda, not /dev/sda1)? Or the other way around? I have attached more, hopefully relevant, information. Any hints? Best regards, Andreas |
|
From: Andreas W. <and...@gm...> - 2009-06-30 15:30:36
|
Hi, when I try to run configure with recent versions of partclone (tested with latest svn version and with partclone-0.1.1) I get the following error: configure: checking for NTFS Library and Header files ... ... checking ntfs/version.h usability... yes checking ntfs/version.h presence... yes checking for ntfs/version.h... yes checking version of libntfs... /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lntfs collect2: ld returned 1 exit status ./configure: line 8851: ./get_lib_version: No such file or directory ./configure: line 8852: ./get_lib_version: No such file or directory ./configure: line 8853: ./get_lib_version: No such file or directory ?:?:?; bad configure: error: Please check your libntfs! I had no problems building partclone-0.1.0-2 (from sourceforge). I am using Fedora 10. The following NTFS related packages are installed: $ rpm -qa|grep -i ntfs ntfsprogs-gnomevfs-2.0.0-9.fc10.i386 ntfsprogs-2.0.0-9.fc10.i386 ntfsprogs-devel-2.0.0-9.fc10.i386 ntfs-3g-devel-2009.4.4-1.fc10.i386 ntfs-3g-2009.4.4-1.fc10.i386 Any hints? Best regards, Andreas |
|
From: Nik N. <mac...@gm...> - 2009-06-17 18:18:31
|
Thomas, I was able to take an image using the latest clonezilla live cd. I don't think this was a problem with partclone, so I apologize for taking up your time. I think there might have been a problem with my partition table. When I booted into OS X, Finder said I had only 500 MB free on the root partition, though Disk Utility reported 20 GB free! I erased the partition and overwrote it with a backup, so everything is fine, now. Thank you, Nik |
|
From: Thomas <th...@nc...> - 2009-06-10 13:12:05
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear Nik Nyby, I can not reproduce this problem, but I am trying to fix it. Could you try the program in http://free.nchc.org.tw/drbl-core/pool/drbl/unstable/p/partclone/partclone_0.1.1-10.tar.gz or use clonezilla. The Clonezilla-live-1.2.2-20 (testing version) has included the latest partclone. http://www.clonezilla.org/ Please let us know the results. Thank x. Thomas. Nik Nyby wrote: | I'm not using raid. This partition table is from a dual ppc mac pro | running OS X 10.5.6. Before running partclone I added two ext3 | partitions at the end of the drive with gparted. Maybe that has | something to do with this error? | | Nik | | On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Thomas <th...@nc...> wrote: | First, sorry for reply late.... | | The message show your super block and bitmap is different. | The super block say | | freeBlocks:18609097 | but bitmap (I calaulate is) | | bitmap free count err, free:23973422 | | Did you use raid or something... | What version of osx and what kind of MAC...? | | Thomas | | Nik Nyby wrote: | | Hi, | | I'm trying to clone an hfs+ partition with r248 of partclone's svn. It | | seems the problem is with this particular partition, because I have | | successfully cloned another hfs+ partition on the same drive. | | | | Here is what prints to stdout when I run this partclone command: | | # ./partclone.hfsp -c -s /dev/sda2 -O | | /mnt/ocelot/ComputerCenter/Mac/2009-05-05.partclone | | bitmap free count err, free:23973422 | | Partclone fail, please check /var/log/partclone.log ! | | | | And /var/log/partclone.log contains: | | Signature=H+ | | Version=4 | | Attr-Unmounted=1(1 is clean, 0 is dirty) | | Attr-Inconsistent=0 | | HFS_Plus '/dev/sda2' is clean | | blockSize:4096 | | totalBlocks:25243137 | | freeBlocks:18609097 | | logicalSize: 0 | | clumpSize: 3284992 | | totalBlocks: 802 | | exten 0 startBlock: 77504 | | exten 0 blockCount: 802 | | exten 1 startBlock: 0 | | exten 1 blockCount: 0 | | exten 2 startBlock: 0 | | exten 2 blockCount: 0 | | exten 3 startBlock: 0 | | exten 3 blockCount: 0 | | exten 4 startBlock: 0 | | exten 4 blockCount: 0 | | exten 5 startBlock: 0 | | exten 5 blockCount: 0 | | exten 6 startBlock: 0 | | exten 6 blockCount: 0 | | exten 7 startBlock: 0 | | exten 7 blockCount: 0 | | logicalSize: 0 | | clumpSize: 7340032 | | totalBlocks: 1536 | | exten 0 startBlock: 2528 | | exten 0 blockCount: 1536 | | exten 1 startBlock: 0 | | exten 1 blockCount: 0 | | exten 2 startBlock: 0 | | exten 2 blockCount: 0 | | exten 3 startBlock: 0 | | exten 3 blockCount: 0 | | exten 4 startBlock: 0 | | exten 4 blockCount: 0 | | exten 5 startBlock: 0 | | exten 5 blockCount: 0 | | exten 6 startBlock: 0 | | exten 6 blockCount: 0 | | exten 7 startBlock: 0 | | exten 7 blockCount: 0 | | logicalSize: 0 | | clumpSize: 26214400 | | totalBlocks: 72960 | | exten 0 startBlock: 4064 | | exten 0 blockCount: 63232 | | exten 1 startBlock: 67776 | | exten 1 blockCount: 9728 | | exten 2 startBlock: 0 | | exten 2 blockCount: 0 | | exten 3 startBlock: 0 | | exten 3 blockCount: 0 | | exten 4 startBlock: 0 | | exten 4 blockCount: 0 | | exten 5 startBlock: 0 | | exten 5 blockCount: 0 | | exten 6 startBlock: 0 | | exten 6 blockCount: 0 | | exten 7 startBlock: 0 | | exten 7 blockCount: 0 | | logicalSize: 0 | | clumpSize: 0 | | totalBlocks: 4864 | | exten 0 startBlock: 262144 | | exten 0 blockCount: 4864 | | exten 1 startBlock: 0 | | exten 1 blockCount: 0 | | exten 2 startBlock: 0 | | exten 2 blockCount: 0 | | exten 3 startBlock: 0 | | exten 3 blockCount: 0 | | exten 4 startBlock: 0 | | exten 4 blockCount: 0 | | exten 5 startBlock: 0 | | exten 5 blockCount: 0 | | exten 6 startBlock: 0 | | exten 6 blockCount: 0 | | exten 7 startBlock: 0 | | exten 7 blockCount: 0 | | logicalSize: 0 | | clumpSize: 0 | | totalBlocks: 0 | | exten 0 startBlock: 0 | | exten 0 blockCount: 0 | | exten 1 startBlock: 0 | | exten 1 blockCount: 0 | | exten 2 startBlock: 0 | | exten 2 blockCount: 0 | | exten 3 startBlock: 0 | | exten 3 blockCount: 0 | | exten 4 startBlock: 0 | | exten 4 blockCount: 0 | | exten 5 startBlock: 0 | | exten 5 blockCount: 0 | | exten 6 startBlock: 0 | | exten 6 blockCount: 0 | | exten 7 startBlock: 0 | | exten 7 blockCount: 0 | | Signature=H+ | | Version=4 | | Attr-Unmounted=1(1 is clean, 0 is dirty) | | Attr-Inconsistent=0 | | HFS_Plus '/dev/sda2' is clean | | bitmap free count err, free:23973422 | | | | I hope some of this is helpful. Let me know if more info about the | | partition might help. | | | | | | Nik | | | | | - | - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | | The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your | | production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to | | Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW | KODAK i700 | | Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image | | processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com | | _______________________________________________ | | Partclone-user mailing list | | Par...@li... | | https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/partclone-user | |> - -- Thomas, 蔡育欽 國家高速網路與計算中心 格網技術組 專案助理研究員 thomas at nchc org tw pub key 46379ACF fingerprint = 7BB2 2103 CADC 59F6 11D5 BCB3 5E97 22B4 4637 9ACF -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkovsOAACgkQXpcitEY3ms+edACfYFqK/4bxrRs1EDj91IQTLvsp sgsAn3dhBP+b8HkUY+QYEJIgh3XUsab5 =X0JW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Thomas <th...@nc...> - 2009-05-22 08:07:51
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 First, sorry for reply late.... The message show your super block and bitmap is different. The super block say | freeBlocks:18609097 but bitmap (I calaulate is) | bitmap free count err, free:23973422 Did you use raid or something... What version of osx and what kind of MAC...? Thomas Nik Nyby wrote: | Hi, | I'm trying to clone an hfs+ partition with r248 of partclone's svn. It | seems the problem is with this particular partition, because I have | successfully cloned another hfs+ partition on the same drive. | | Here is what prints to stdout when I run this partclone command: | # ./partclone.hfsp -c -s /dev/sda2 -O | /mnt/ocelot/ComputerCenter/Mac/2009-05-05.partclone | bitmap free count err, free:23973422 | Partclone fail, please check /var/log/partclone.log ! | | And /var/log/partclone.log contains: | Signature=H+ | Version=4 | Attr-Unmounted=1(1 is clean, 0 is dirty) | Attr-Inconsistent=0 | HFS_Plus '/dev/sda2' is clean | blockSize:4096 | totalBlocks:25243137 | freeBlocks:18609097 | logicalSize: 0 | clumpSize: 3284992 | totalBlocks: 802 | exten 0 startBlock: 77504 | exten 0 blockCount: 802 | exten 1 startBlock: 0 | exten 1 blockCount: 0 | exten 2 startBlock: 0 | exten 2 blockCount: 0 | exten 3 startBlock: 0 | exten 3 blockCount: 0 | exten 4 startBlock: 0 | exten 4 blockCount: 0 | exten 5 startBlock: 0 | exten 5 blockCount: 0 | exten 6 startBlock: 0 | exten 6 blockCount: 0 | exten 7 startBlock: 0 | exten 7 blockCount: 0 | logicalSize: 0 | clumpSize: 7340032 | totalBlocks: 1536 | exten 0 startBlock: 2528 | exten 0 blockCount: 1536 | exten 1 startBlock: 0 | exten 1 blockCount: 0 | exten 2 startBlock: 0 | exten 2 blockCount: 0 | exten 3 startBlock: 0 | exten 3 blockCount: 0 | exten 4 startBlock: 0 | exten 4 blockCount: 0 | exten 5 startBlock: 0 | exten 5 blockCount: 0 | exten 6 startBlock: 0 | exten 6 blockCount: 0 | exten 7 startBlock: 0 | exten 7 blockCount: 0 | logicalSize: 0 | clumpSize: 26214400 | totalBlocks: 72960 | exten 0 startBlock: 4064 | exten 0 blockCount: 63232 | exten 1 startBlock: 67776 | exten 1 blockCount: 9728 | exten 2 startBlock: 0 | exten 2 blockCount: 0 | exten 3 startBlock: 0 | exten 3 blockCount: 0 | exten 4 startBlock: 0 | exten 4 blockCount: 0 | exten 5 startBlock: 0 | exten 5 blockCount: 0 | exten 6 startBlock: 0 | exten 6 blockCount: 0 | exten 7 startBlock: 0 | exten 7 blockCount: 0 | logicalSize: 0 | clumpSize: 0 | totalBlocks: 4864 | exten 0 startBlock: 262144 | exten 0 blockCount: 4864 | exten 1 startBlock: 0 | exten 1 blockCount: 0 | exten 2 startBlock: 0 | exten 2 blockCount: 0 | exten 3 startBlock: 0 | exten 3 blockCount: 0 | exten 4 startBlock: 0 | exten 4 blockCount: 0 | exten 5 startBlock: 0 | exten 5 blockCount: 0 | exten 6 startBlock: 0 | exten 6 blockCount: 0 | exten 7 startBlock: 0 | exten 7 blockCount: 0 | logicalSize: 0 | clumpSize: 0 | totalBlocks: 0 | exten 0 startBlock: 0 | exten 0 blockCount: 0 | exten 1 startBlock: 0 | exten 1 blockCount: 0 | exten 2 startBlock: 0 | exten 2 blockCount: 0 | exten 3 startBlock: 0 | exten 3 blockCount: 0 | exten 4 startBlock: 0 | exten 4 blockCount: 0 | exten 5 startBlock: 0 | exten 5 blockCount: 0 | exten 6 startBlock: 0 | exten 6 blockCount: 0 | exten 7 startBlock: 0 | exten 7 blockCount: 0 | Signature=H+ | Version=4 | Attr-Unmounted=1(1 is clean, 0 is dirty) | Attr-Inconsistent=0 | HFS_Plus '/dev/sda2' is clean | bitmap free count err, free:23973422 | | I hope some of this is helpful. Let me know if more info about the | partition might help. | | | Nik | | - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your | production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to | Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 | Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image | processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com | _______________________________________________ | Partclone-user mailing list | Par...@li... | https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/partclone-user - -- Thomas, 蔡育欽 國家高速網路與計算中心 格網技術組 專案助理研究員 thomas at nchc org tw pub key 46379ACF fingerprint = 7BB2 2103 CADC 59F6 11D5 BCB3 5E97 22B4 4637 9ACF -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkoWXVMACgkQXpcitEY3ms/NuQCZAVT0tLeuxypsFD1K78/tlDme U68AoMBdOK/gg7W1csR4ojRBg+7tQazl =XG53 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Nik N. <mac...@gm...> - 2009-05-05 23:53:29
|
Hi, I'm trying to clone an hfs+ partition with r248 of partclone's svn. It seems the problem is with this particular partition, because I have successfully cloned another hfs+ partition on the same drive. Here is what prints to stdout when I run this partclone command: # ./partclone.hfsp -c -s /dev/sda2 -O /mnt/ocelot/ComputerCenter/Mac/2009-05-05.partclone bitmap free count err, free:23973422 Partclone fail, please check /var/log/partclone.log ! And /var/log/partclone.log contains: Signature=H+ Version=4 Attr-Unmounted=1(1 is clean, 0 is dirty) Attr-Inconsistent=0 HFS_Plus '/dev/sda2' is clean blockSize:4096 totalBlocks:25243137 freeBlocks:18609097 logicalSize: 0 clumpSize: 3284992 totalBlocks: 802 exten 0 startBlock: 77504 exten 0 blockCount: 802 exten 1 startBlock: 0 exten 1 blockCount: 0 exten 2 startBlock: 0 exten 2 blockCount: 0 exten 3 startBlock: 0 exten 3 blockCount: 0 exten 4 startBlock: 0 exten 4 blockCount: 0 exten 5 startBlock: 0 exten 5 blockCount: 0 exten 6 startBlock: 0 exten 6 blockCount: 0 exten 7 startBlock: 0 exten 7 blockCount: 0 logicalSize: 0 clumpSize: 7340032 totalBlocks: 1536 exten 0 startBlock: 2528 exten 0 blockCount: 1536 exten 1 startBlock: 0 exten 1 blockCount: 0 exten 2 startBlock: 0 exten 2 blockCount: 0 exten 3 startBlock: 0 exten 3 blockCount: 0 exten 4 startBlock: 0 exten 4 blockCount: 0 exten 5 startBlock: 0 exten 5 blockCount: 0 exten 6 startBlock: 0 exten 6 blockCount: 0 exten 7 startBlock: 0 exten 7 blockCount: 0 logicalSize: 0 clumpSize: 26214400 totalBlocks: 72960 exten 0 startBlock: 4064 exten 0 blockCount: 63232 exten 1 startBlock: 67776 exten 1 blockCount: 9728 exten 2 startBlock: 0 exten 2 blockCount: 0 exten 3 startBlock: 0 exten 3 blockCount: 0 exten 4 startBlock: 0 exten 4 blockCount: 0 exten 5 startBlock: 0 exten 5 blockCount: 0 exten 6 startBlock: 0 exten 6 blockCount: 0 exten 7 startBlock: 0 exten 7 blockCount: 0 logicalSize: 0 clumpSize: 0 totalBlocks: 4864 exten 0 startBlock: 262144 exten 0 blockCount: 4864 exten 1 startBlock: 0 exten 1 blockCount: 0 exten 2 startBlock: 0 exten 2 blockCount: 0 exten 3 startBlock: 0 exten 3 blockCount: 0 exten 4 startBlock: 0 exten 4 blockCount: 0 exten 5 startBlock: 0 exten 5 blockCount: 0 exten 6 startBlock: 0 exten 6 blockCount: 0 exten 7 startBlock: 0 exten 7 blockCount: 0 logicalSize: 0 clumpSize: 0 totalBlocks: 0 exten 0 startBlock: 0 exten 0 blockCount: 0 exten 1 startBlock: 0 exten 1 blockCount: 0 exten 2 startBlock: 0 exten 2 blockCount: 0 exten 3 startBlock: 0 exten 3 blockCount: 0 exten 4 startBlock: 0 exten 4 blockCount: 0 exten 5 startBlock: 0 exten 5 blockCount: 0 exten 6 startBlock: 0 exten 6 blockCount: 0 exten 7 startBlock: 0 exten 7 blockCount: 0 Signature=H+ Version=4 Attr-Unmounted=1(1 is clean, 0 is dirty) Attr-Inconsistent=0 HFS_Plus '/dev/sda2' is clean bitmap free count err, free:23973422 I hope some of this is helpful. Let me know if more info about the partition might help. Nik |
|
From: Nik N. <mac...@gm...> - 2009-03-12 22:47:12
|
It works great, now. Thank you! On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Yu-Chin Tsai <th...@nc...> wrote: > tkx for report the problem. > I update the source code to r209, please try again. > > tkx > Thomas > > 於 三，2009-03-11 於 17:23 -0700，Nik Nyby 提到： >> Hello, I'm trying to take an image of an NTFS partition with the >> latest (r208) version of partclone. Here is there error I'm getting: >> >> (note that I changed the error log so it prints volume_size as well) >> # ./partclone-unstable/src/partclone.ntfs -c -O /tmp/test.img -s /dev/sda1 >> Current NTFS volume size (-9197023338818084864) is bigger than the >> device size (5964281035050278912)! >> Corrupt partition table or incorrect partitioning? >> >> >> Why does volume_size appear to be negative? >> Other programs, including ntfsresize, have no trouble with the partition: >> >> # ntfsresize --info /dev/sda1 >> ntfsresize v2.0.0 (libntfs 10:0:0) >> Device name : /dev/sda1 >> NTFS volume version: 3.1 >> Cluster size : 4096 bytes >> Current volume size: 31453438464 bytes (31454 MB) >> Current device size: 32218389504 bytes (32219 MB) >> Checking filesystem consistency ... >> 100.00 percent completed >> Accounting clusters ... >> Space in use : 26475 MB (84.2%) >> Collecting resizing constraints ... >> You might resize at 26474586112 bytes or 26475 MB (freeing 4979 MB). >> Please make a test run using both the -n and -s options before real resizing! >> >> >> Let me know if there is any more info that could be helpful! >> >> Thanks, >> Nik >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are >> powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and >> easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development >> software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. >> Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com >> _______________________________________________ >> Partclone-user mailing list >> Par...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/partclone-user > |
|
From: Yu-Chin T. <th...@nc...> - 2009-03-12 06:42:57
|
tkx for report the problem. I update the source code to r209, please try again. tkx Thomas 於 三，2009-03-11 於 17:23 -0700，Nik Nyby 提到： > Hello, I'm trying to take an image of an NTFS partition with the > latest (r208) version of partclone. Here is there error I'm getting: > > (note that I changed the error log so it prints volume_size as well) > # ./partclone-unstable/src/partclone.ntfs -c -O /tmp/test.img -s /dev/sda1 > Current NTFS volume size (-9197023338818084864) is bigger than the > device size (5964281035050278912)! > Corrupt partition table or incorrect partitioning? > > > Why does volume_size appear to be negative? > Other programs, including ntfsresize, have no trouble with the partition: > > # ntfsresize --info /dev/sda1 > ntfsresize v2.0.0 (libntfs 10:0:0) > Device name : /dev/sda1 > NTFS volume version: 3.1 > Cluster size : 4096 bytes > Current volume size: 31453438464 bytes (31454 MB) > Current device size: 32218389504 bytes (32219 MB) > Checking filesystem consistency ... > 100.00 percent completed > Accounting clusters ... > Space in use : 26475 MB (84.2%) > Collecting resizing constraints ... > You might resize at 26474586112 bytes or 26475 MB (freeing 4979 MB). > Please make a test run using both the -n and -s options before real resizing! > > > Let me know if there is any more info that could be helpful! > > Thanks, > Nik > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are > powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and > easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development > software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. > Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com > _______________________________________________ > Partclone-user mailing list > Par...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/partclone-user |
|
From: Nik N. <mac...@gm...> - 2009-03-12 00:23:53
|
Hello, I'm trying to take an image of an NTFS partition with the latest (r208) version of partclone. Here is there error I'm getting: (note that I changed the error log so it prints volume_size as well) # ./partclone-unstable/src/partclone.ntfs -c -O /tmp/test.img -s /dev/sda1 Current NTFS volume size (-9197023338818084864) is bigger than the device size (5964281035050278912)! Corrupt partition table or incorrect partitioning? Why does volume_size appear to be negative? Other programs, including ntfsresize, have no trouble with the partition: # ntfsresize --info /dev/sda1 ntfsresize v2.0.0 (libntfs 10:0:0) Device name : /dev/sda1 NTFS volume version: 3.1 Cluster size : 4096 bytes Current volume size: 31453438464 bytes (31454 MB) Current device size: 32218389504 bytes (32219 MB) Checking filesystem consistency ... 100.00 percent completed Accounting clusters ... Space in use : 26475 MB (84.2%) Collecting resizing constraints ... You might resize at 26474586112 bytes or 26475 MB (freeing 4979 MB). Please make a test run using both the -n and -s options before real resizing! Let me know if there is any more info that could be helpful! Thanks, Nik |
|
From: Yu-Chin T. <th...@nc...> - 2009-03-05 04:21:38
|
test mailing system |