also, I've glanced over the code(revision 59) and it's all a pretty good coding style.. I understand most of it... lol.. it looks a lot like bochs code though...
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I'm trying a slightly different method of interpretation. (One that is theoretically less work.) Instead of having the separate instruction functions read their data according to their needs, I'm trying to have a single system read all the data based on tables, and then passing it along to a single instruction implementation. It's slower, but I'm lazy. ;)
My goal is a *super small* base, with a module system, like before.(Similar in design to Minix3.)
T..o..t..a...l..l..y...
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
So, where are you going with this project?
also, I've glanced over the code(revision 59) and it's all a pretty good coding style.. I understand most of it... lol.. it looks a lot like bochs code though...
I'm trying a slightly different method of interpretation. (One that is theoretically less work.) Instead of having the separate instruction functions read their data according to their needs, I'm trying to have a single system read all the data based on tables, and then passing it along to a single instruction implementation. It's slower, but I'm lazy. ;)
My goal is a *super small* base, with a module system, like before.(Similar in design to Minix3.)
T..o..t..a...l..l..y...