Thread: [Ndiswrapper-general] Bit rate problems
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
pgiri
From: FameR <dj....@gm...> - 2008-04-08 11:46:45
|
I have a d-link dwa 110 usb adapter. It installed ok with winxp drivers and enables b/g types. But I have a problem It allways use max bitrate 11Mb/s. I tryed iwpriv wlan0 network_type g as shown in faq, it changed type b to g but my bitrate shown on iwconfig and practical till low. In windows I have the same problem and it solved by changin b type to g type in adapter's driver preferences. And it have speed something about twice faster than on my ubuntu's ndiswrapper driver. How do I fix my bitrate? |
From: James S. <Sha...@ea...> - 2008-04-08 12:24:34
|
> iwpriv wlan0 network_type g iwconfig wlan0 rate 54 iwconfig wlan0 rate auto Although I only have to set mine when connecting to b type networks. Otherwise dhclient3 doesn't work quite right. HTH |
From: FameR <dj....@gm...> - 2008-04-09 11:50:43
|
Unfortunately it didn't help. i still have low speed on data transfering and on iwconfig it Bit Rate: 11Mb/s. Can i try something else? On 4/8/08, James Shatto <Sha...@ea...> wrote: > > iwpriv wlan0 network_type g > > iwconfig wlan0 rate 54 > iwconfig wlan0 rate auto > > Although I only have to set mine when connecting to b type networks. > Otherwise dhclient3 doesn't work quite right. > > HTH > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference > Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., > Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone > _______________________________________________ > Ndiswrapper-general mailing list > Ndi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ndiswrapper-general > |
From: James S. <Sha...@ea...> - 2008-04-09 13:36:57
|
> Unfortunately it didn't help. i still have low speed on data > transfering and on iwconfig it Bit Rate: 11Mb/s. Can i try something > else? Are both ends of the network g or better capable? Does "iwlist wlan0 scanning" show anything special. Or at least show Bit Rates: 54 Mb/s. If the other end doesn't support it, you're not gonna make a connection using it. iwlist wlan0 scanning Most local access points around here are b only. I guess with it's limited range it helps keep the customers in house and prevents the company from servicing the neighborhood. Or they're too cheap to buy anything more recent. Or are worried about compatibilitiy or something. In one hotel I was in you literally had to go to the lobby to get a connection. Although if you were creative you could get close enough to the 8th story window to get a low grade connection. Laptop on top of the back of the chair and within three feet of the window. Much better transfer rates in the lobby though. But only 2 out of 3 wall tethers actually had power in the lobby. And renovations were under way, so not the most pleasant environment. |
From: FameR <dj....@gm...> - 2008-04-09 16:29:03
|
I just making ad-hoc connection between my laptop and desktop computers. Laptop ubuntu works fine with 11 and 54. On desktop i have another card that i have troubles with. scanning gives: Scan completed : Cell 01 - Address: 02:15:AF:46:E9:61 ESSID:"famer-desk" Mode:Ad-Hoc Frequency:2.437 GHz (Channel 6) Quality=66/70 Signal level=-29 dBm Noise level=-95 dBm Encryption key:on Bit Rates:1 Mb/s; 2 Mb/s; 5.5 Mb/s; 11 Mb/s Extra:bcn_int=100 P.S. Sorry for my bad english sometimes On 4/9/08, James Shatto <Sha...@ea...> wrote: > > Unfortunately it didn't help. i still have low speed on data > > transfering and on iwconfig it Bit Rate: 11Mb/s. Can i try something > > else? > > Are both ends of the network g or better capable? Does "iwlist wlan0 > scanning" show anything special. Or at least show Bit Rates: 54 Mb/s. If > the other end doesn't support it, you're not gonna make a connection using > it. > > iwlist wlan0 scanning > > Most local access points around here are b only. I guess with it's limited > range it helps keep the customers in house and prevents the company from > servicing the neighborhood. Or they're too cheap to buy anything more > recent. Or are worried about compatibilitiy or something. In one hotel I > was in you literally had to go to the lobby to get a connection. Although > if you were creative you could get close enough to the 8th story window to > get a low grade connection. Laptop on top of the back of the chair and > within three feet of the window. Much better transfer rates in the lobby > though. But only 2 out of 3 wall tethers actually had power in the lobby. > And renovations were under way, so not the most pleasant environment. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference > Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. > Use priority code J8TL2D2. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone > _______________________________________________ > Ndiswrapper-general mailing list > Ndi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ndiswrapper-general > |
From: James S. <Sha...@ea...> - 2008-04-09 19:13:35
|
> Scan completed : > Cell 01 - Address: 02:15:AF:46:E9:61 > ESSID:"famer-desk" > Mode:Ad-Hoc > Frequency:2.437 GHz (Channel 6) > Quality=66/70 Signal level=-29 dBm > Noise level=-95 dBm > Encryption key:on > Bit Rates:1 Mb/s; 2 Mb/s; 5.5 Mb/s; 11 Mb/s > Extra:bcn_int=100 Looks like it doesn't support g. wlan0 Scan completed : Cell 01 - Address: 00:11:22:33:44:55 ESSID:"dr_who" Protocol:IEEE 802.11g Mode:Ad-Hoc Frequency:2.437 GHz (Channel 6) Quality:76/100 Signal level:-47 dBm Noise level:-96 dBm Encryption key:on Bit Rates:1 Mb/s; 2 Mb/s; 5.5 Mb/s; 6 Mb/s; 9 Mb/s 11 Mb/s; 12 Mb/s; 18 Mb/s; 24 Mb/s; 36 Mb/s 48 Mb/s; 54 Mb/s Extra:bcn_int=100 Extra:atim=0 Note the differences in your Bit Rates results relative to mine. Although those results would be for the point you're trying to connect to, not the machine running the scan. So it would be the other machine that is not set to g. iwconfig (with no parms) wlan0 IEEE 802.11g ESSID:"dr_who" Mode:Ad-Hoc Frequency:2.437 GHz Cell: 00:11:22:33:44:55 Bit Rate=54 Mb/s Tx-Power:24 dBm RTS thr=2347 B Fragment thr=2346 B Encryption key:FFFF-FFFF-FFFF-FFFF-FFFF-FFFF-FF Security mode:restricted Power Management max timeout:0us mode:All packets received Link Quality:82/100 Signal level:-43 dBm Noise level:-96 dBm Rx invalid nwid:0 Rx invalid crypt:0 Rx invalid frag:0 Tx excessive retries:0 Invalid misc:0 Missed beacon:0 The above would be for the local machine. capable of != configured to |
From: FameR <dj....@gm...> - 2008-04-11 12:22:16
|
Ok thanx for care. I think i'll change my adapter On 4/9/08, James Shatto <Sha...@ea...> wrote: > > Scan completed : > > Cell 01 - Address: 02:15:AF:46:E9:61 > > ESSID:"famer-desk" > > Mode:Ad-Hoc > > Frequency:2.437 GHz (Channel 6) > > Quality=66/70 Signal level=-29 dBm > > Noise level=-95 dBm > > Encryption key:on > > Bit Rates:1 Mb/s; 2 Mb/s; 5.5 Mb/s; 11 Mb/s > > Extra:bcn_int=100 > > Looks like it doesn't support g. > > wlan0 Scan completed : > Cell 01 - Address: 00:11:22:33:44:55 > ESSID:"dr_who" > Protocol:IEEE 802.11g > Mode:Ad-Hoc > Frequency:2.437 GHz (Channel 6) > Quality:76/100 Signal level:-47 dBm > Noise level:-96 dBm > Encryption key:on > Bit Rates:1 Mb/s; 2 Mb/s; 5.5 Mb/s; 6 Mb/s; 9 Mb/s > 11 Mb/s; 12 Mb/s; 18 Mb/s; 24 Mb/s; 36 Mb/s > 48 Mb/s; 54 Mb/s > Extra:bcn_int=100 > Extra:atim=0 > > Note the differences in your Bit Rates results relative to mine. Although > those results would be for the point you're trying to connect to, not the > machine running the scan. So it would be the other machine that is not set > to g. > > iwconfig > (with no parms) > > wlan0 IEEE 802.11g ESSID:"dr_who" > Mode:Ad-Hoc Frequency:2.437 GHz Cell: 00:11:22:33:44:55 > Bit Rate=54 Mb/s Tx-Power:24 dBm > RTS thr=2347 B Fragment thr=2346 B > Encryption key:FFFF-FFFF-FFFF-FFFF-FFFF-FFFF-FF Security > mode:restricted > Power Management max timeout:0us mode:All packets received > Link Quality:82/100 Signal level:-43 dBm Noise level:-96 dBm > Rx invalid nwid:0 Rx invalid crypt:0 Rx invalid frag:0 > Tx excessive retries:0 Invalid misc:0 Missed beacon:0 > > The above would be for the local machine. > > capable of != configured to > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference > Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. > Use priority code J8TL2D2. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone > _______________________________________________ > Ndiswrapper-general mailing list > Ndi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ndiswrapper-general > |