Thread: [Ndiswrapper-general] Fixes to 0.8-rc1
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
pgiri
From: Giridhar P. <gi...@lm...> - 2004-06-01 13:51:09
Attachments:
0.8-rc1-fixes
|
The following patch fixes many problems since 0.8-rc1. These changes are already in CVS, but the sourceforge.net anonymous CVS server seems to be down since yesterday, hence this patch to the list. |
From: <az...@se...> - 2004-06-01 14:14:13
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Giridhar Pemmasani wrote: | The following patch fixes many problems since 0.8-rc1. | | These changes are already in CVS, but the sourceforge.net anonymous | CVS server seems to be down since yesterday, hence this patch to the | list. Could you maybe release it as 0.8-rc2? Regards, - -- ~ .''`. Torbj=F6rn Svensson, azoff (at) se (dot) linux (dot) org ~ : :' : 7EB9 2DC5 61AE DAB5 7099 BAC6 798E E39A DBDB 0CFD ~ `. `' http://azoff.homeip.net:8080/ | http://azoff.tty0.org ~ `-- http://www.se.linux.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAvI8ueY7jmtvbDP0RAtJ/AKDLjG/TwK59QdxCXpAUUCnetQsAdgCguKW/ 7Ksmatk2ywzlC3swoPv5+vc=3D =3DOdWW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: Anze S. <anz...@fm...> - 2004-06-01 16:12:47
|
> These changes are already in CVS, but the sourceforge.net anonymous > CVS server seems to be down since yesterday, hence this patch to the > list. Yes, I've noticed that... Anyway, with this patch it works without my silly hack... The problem was the preemptive kernel patch, it seems... Thanks, anze |
From: Diego De S. <die...@li...> - 2004-06-01 16:41:21
|
Alle 15:51, marted=C3=AC 01 giugno 2004, Giridhar Pemmasani ha scritto: > The following patch fixes many problems since 0.8-rc1. > These changes are already in CVS, but the sourceforge.net anonymous > CVS server seems to be down since yesterday, hence this patch to the > list. great work!!! This version run perfectly on smp machines, now. I did only a= =20 small test, but seems to work good. Thank you. |
From: Tim B. <ti...@be...> - 2004-06-02 04:27:26
|
Hi, I'm now using 0.8-rc2 with an SMP kernel. It seems to work fine. The Badness in local_bh_enable messages have gone, and it seems to be running stable. Just testing it by backing up my server... will report back if I have any more problems. BTW, Apologies for not filing that bug report a couple of weeks back... I've been otherwise tied up. My wishlist now is getting promiscuous mode working for WLAN (so I can get VMware working with some windows only VPN software). But I guess that's beyond the scope of the project, etc. Thanks... keep up the good work. Tim -- Tim Behrsin E: ti...@be... |
From: Giridhar P. <gi...@lm...> - 2004-06-02 04:32:54
|
I am not so sure that SMP problems are all fixed. I know of one case where the driver crashes with SMP kernel with multiple processors (not HT). I am trying to fix the problem. Once this is fixed, I will let others know. -- Giri |
From: Diego De S. <die...@li...> - 2004-06-03 16:47:41
|
Alle 06:33, mercoled=EC 02 giugno 2004, Giridhar Pemmasani ha scritto: > I am not so sure that SMP problems are all fixed. I know of one case > where the driver crashes with SMP kernel with multiple processors (not > HT). I am trying to fix the problem. Once this is fixed, I will let > others know. i spoke too early... :-(=20 You're right, i'm still having problem with SMP. Tomorrow i'll post some=20 kernel logs, if can be useful. |