Thread: [MiKTeX] miktex 2.7 on vista home premium 64-bit
MiKTeX source code moved to GitHub
Brought to you by:
csc
From: <wke...@co...> - 2009-03-29 05:47:00
|
Hello, I just installed MiKTeX 2.7 on a laptop with Windows Vista Home Premium 64-bit and now I want to install the new Lucida Bright fonts. On XP you can install them in All Users, but where do I install them in WVHP? Thanks, Walter Kehowski |
From: chandrasekhar s <cha...@gm...> - 2009-03-29 05:58:24
|
Hi-- If the "Lucida Bright" font is not there in the Microsoft Word then i am sorry i do not know the procedure. If its there then use the command \setmainfont[Mapping=tex-text]{Lucida Bright} and work. Chandrasekhar -- "The only place where success comes before work is the Dictionary"- Vince Lombardi |
From: Evaristo A. F. <eva...@hd...> - 2009-03-29 12:56:55
|
En Sun, 29 Mar 2009 01:16:55 -0430, <wke...@co...> escribió: > Hello, > > I just installed MiKTeX 2.7 on a laptop with Windows Vista Home Premium > 64-bit and now I want to install the new Lucida Bright fonts. On XP you > can install them in All Users, but where do I install them in WVHP? > > Thanks, > > Walter Kehowski > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > MiKTeX-Users mailing list > MiK...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/miktex-users -- Hola http://www.fontfrenzy.org/ in this site you will find Font Frenzy, a little, useful and free program. I hope this help you. cheers Atentamente, Evaristo Arroyo F. .............................................................. Departamento de Investigación e Informática Facultad de Humanidades y Educación Universidad del Zulia - Venezuela |
From: Evaristo A. F. <eva...@in...> - 2009-03-29 13:02:11
|
En Sun, 29 Mar 2009 01:16:55 -0430, <wke...@co...> escribió: > Hello, > > I just installed MiKTeX 2.7 on a laptop with Windows Vista Home Premium > 64-bit and now I want to install the new Lucida Bright fonts. On XP you > can install them in All Users, but where do I install them in WVHP? > > Thanks, > > Walter Kehowski > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > MiKTeX-Users mailing list > MiK...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/miktex-users Hi http://www.fontfrenzy.org/ in this site you will find Font Frenzy, a little, useful and free program. I hope this help you. cheers Evaristo |
From: Ulrike F. <li...@ni...> - 2009-03-29 13:27:50
|
am Sonntag, 29. März 2009 um 07:46 schrieb wke...@co...: > Hello, > I just installed MiKTeX 2.7 on a laptop with Windows Vista Home > Premium 64-bit and now I want to install the new Lucida Bright > fonts. On XP you can install them in All Users, but where do I > install them in WVHP? I would say the answer depends on what you mean by the "new lucida bright fonts" and what your mean by "installing". If you mean the lucida font package for latex you can get from TUG: I don't have vista but I doubt that things are very different from XP, and there I would create a local texmf-tree and move the fonts and the other files in this tree. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Ulrike Fischer |
From: Dragan B. <bl...@tu...> - 2009-04-13 16:22:01
|
Dear Ulrike It seems that the packages hyperref and bm conflict, at least when \bm appears in a section heading. In the manual for hyperref (Rahtz/Oberdiek, 2008) in Section "Support for for other packages" I could not find anything concerning this. Here is a minimal example: \documentclass{amsproc} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{bm} \usepackage{hyperref} \title{TITLE} \author{Author} \begin{document} \maketitle \section{$\rho\bm{\rho}$} % If you comment this line, no problem occurs. $\rho\bm{\rho}$ \end{document} Any solution? Thank you in advance. Dragan Blagojevic (May be pronounced as it were written Dragan Blagoyevich) |
From: Ulrike F. <li...@ni...> - 2009-04-13 15:51:42
|
am Montag, 13. April 2009 um 17:13 schrieb Dragan Blagojevic: > It seems that the packages hyperref and bm conflict, > at least when \bm appears in a section heading. > Here is a minimal example: > \documentclass{amsproc} > \usepackage{amssymb} > \usepackage{bm} > \usepackage{hyperref} > \title{TITLE} \author{Author} > \begin{document} > \maketitle > \section{$\rho\bm{\rho}$} % If you comment this line, no problem occurs. \section{\texorpdfstring{$\rho\bm{\rho}$}{\rho\rho}} -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Ulrike Fischer |
From: Pétiard F. <pet...@fr...> - 2009-04-13 16:44:01
|
Dragan Blagojevic a écrit : > Dear Ulrike > > It seems that the packages hyperref and bm conflict, > at least when \bm appears in a section heading. > > In the manual for hyperref (Rahtz/Oberdiek, 2008) > in Section "Support for for other packages" > I could not find anything concerning this. > > Here is a minimal example: > > \documentclass{amsproc} > \usepackage{amssymb} > \usepackage{bm} > \usepackage{hyperref} > > \title{TITLE} \author{Author} > > \begin{document} > > \maketitle > > \section{$\rho\bm{\rho}$} % If you comment this line, no problem occurs. > > > $\rho\bm{\rho}$ > > > \end{document} > That document compiles without any problem: \documentclass{amsproc} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{bm} \usepackage[unicode]{hyperref} \title{TITLE} \author{Author} \begin{document} \maketitle \section{\texorpdfstring{$\rho\bm{\rho}$}{\textrho\textrho}} $\rho\bm{\rho}$ \end{document} François |