From: Jack F V. <jf...@us...> - 2003-04-22 20:47:25
|
Long as its not before my morning coffee :) I think this is a good idea Hanna Cheers, Jack John Bradford <jo...@gr...>@lists.sourceforge.net on 04/22/2003 10:49:41 AM Sent by: lse...@li... To: ha...@us... cc: lse...@li..., jo...@gr... (John Bradford), lin...@vg..., cl...@os..., wl...@ho... Subject: [Lse-tech] Re: LSE conference call > In light of our speaker sleeping through the meeting and > the fact that kernel hackers tend not to be awake early > in the morning I propose moving the time of the call to > 1pm Pacific Time (GMT-0800). 10 PM U.K. time is no problem for me. > Originally we chose 9:30am to encourage people in Europe and > India to attend. However, the time change has not increased > attendance so I think we should move it to a more reasonable > time for North American Continental dwellers who are the > main attendees. > > Any comments? Debate? Hate mail? Flame war? :-) |
From: Jack F V. <jf...@us...> - 2003-04-22 21:30:00
|
Thursday seems better, 3 on Friday seems cruel and unusual for those east of us timezone wise :) Jack ha...@us...@lists.sourceforge.net on 04/22/2003 02:15:08 PM Please respond to ha...@us... Sent by: lse...@li... To: lse...@li... cc: Jack F Vogel/Beaverton/IBM@IBMUS, John Bradford <jo...@gr...>, ha...@us..., lin...@vg..., cl...@os..., wl...@ho... Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: LSE conference call I am getting reports of some conflicts. Would 2pm on Thursday or 3pm on Friday be acceptable? Pacific Time that is... Remember this is every other week (at best ;) Hanna --On Tuesday, April 22, 2003 11:36:12 AM -0700 Jack F Vogel <jf...@us...> wrote: > > Long as its not before my morning coffee :) I think this is a good idea > Hanna > > Cheers, > > Jack > > > John Bradford <jo...@gr...>@lists.sourceforge.net on 04/22/2003 > 10:49:41 AM > > Sent by: lse...@li... > > > To: ha...@us... > cc: lse...@li..., jo...@gr... (John Bradford), > lin...@vg..., cl...@os..., wl...@ho... > Subject: [Lse-tech] Re: LSE conference call > > >> In light of our speaker sleeping through the meeting and >> the fact that kernel hackers tend not to be awake early >> in the morning I propose moving the time of the call to >> 1pm Pacific Time (GMT-0800). > > 10 PM U.K. time is no problem for me. > >> Originally we chose 9:30am to encourage people in Europe and >> India to attend. However, the time change has not increased >> attendance so I think we should move it to a more reasonable >> time for North American Continental dwellers who are the >> main attendees. >> >> Any comments? Debate? Hate mail? > > Flame war? :-) > > > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to maj...@vg... > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Lse-tech mailing list Lse...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lse-tech |
From: Hanna L. <ha...@us...> - 2003-04-22 21:34:53
|
point. So I am now accepting email with yays or neighs to Thursdays at 2pm. Send it just to me to cut down on mail. If I dont hear anything I will assume it is OK. Hanna --On Tuesday, April 22, 2003 02:23:44 PM -0700 Jack F Vogel <jf...@us...> wrote: > > > > > > Thursday seems better, 3 on Friday seems cruel and unusual for those east > of us timezone wise :) > > Jack > > > ha...@us...@lists.sourceforge.net on 04/22/2003 02:15:08 > PM > > Please respond to ha...@us... > > Sent by: lse...@li... > > > To: lse...@li... > cc: Jack F Vogel/Beaverton/IBM@IBMUS, John Bradford <jo...@gr...>, > ha...@us..., lin...@vg..., > cl...@os..., wl...@ho... > Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: LSE conference call > > > > > > I am getting reports of some conflicts. Would 2pm on Thursday > or 3pm on Friday be acceptable? Pacific Time that is... > > Remember this is every other week (at best ;) > > Hanna > > > --On Tuesday, April 22, 2003 11:36:12 AM -0700 Jack F Vogel > <jf...@us...> wrote: > >> >> Long as its not before my morning coffee :) I think this is a good idea >> Hanna >> >> Cheers, >> >> Jack >> >> >> John Bradford <jo...@gr...>@lists.sourceforge.net on 04/22/2003 >> 10:49:41 AM >> >> Sent by: lse...@li... >> >> >> To: ha...@us... >> cc: lse...@li..., jo...@gr... (John Bradford), >> lin...@vg..., cl...@os..., wl...@ho... >> Subject: [Lse-tech] Re: LSE conference call >> >> >>> In light of our speaker sleeping through the meeting and >>> the fact that kernel hackers tend not to be awake early >>> in the morning I propose moving the time of the call to >>> 1pm Pacific Time (GMT-0800). >> >> 10 PM U.K. time is no problem for me. >> >>> Originally we chose 9:30am to encourage people in Europe and >>> India to attend. However, the time change has not increased >>> attendance so I think we should move it to a more reasonable >>> time for North American Continental dwellers who are the >>> main attendees. >>> >>> Any comments? Debate? Hate mail? >> >> Flame war? :-) >> >> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" > in >> the body of a message to maj...@vg... >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Lse-tech mailing list > Lse...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lse-tech > > > > |
From: Hanna L. <ha...@us...> - 2003-04-22 21:14:36
|
I am getting reports of some conflicts. Would 2pm on Thursday or 3pm on Friday be acceptable? Pacific Time that is... Remember this is every other week (at best ;) Hanna --On Tuesday, April 22, 2003 11:36:12 AM -0700 Jack F Vogel <jf...@us...> wrote: > > Long as its not before my morning coffee :) I think this is a good idea > Hanna > > Cheers, > > Jack > > > John Bradford <jo...@gr...>@lists.sourceforge.net on 04/22/2003 > 10:49:41 AM > > Sent by: lse...@li... > > > To: ha...@us... > cc: lse...@li..., jo...@gr... (John Bradford), > lin...@vg..., cl...@os..., wl...@ho... > Subject: [Lse-tech] Re: LSE conference call > > >> In light of our speaker sleeping through the meeting and >> the fact that kernel hackers tend not to be awake early >> in the morning I propose moving the time of the call to >> 1pm Pacific Time (GMT-0800). > > 10 PM U.K. time is no problem for me. > >> Originally we chose 9:30am to encourage people in Europe and >> India to attend. However, the time change has not increased >> attendance so I think we should move it to a more reasonable >> time for North American Continental dwellers who are the >> main attendees. >> >> Any comments? Debate? Hate mail? > > Flame war? :-) > > > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to maj...@vg... > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > |