From: Tom H. <tom...@at...> - 2010-02-22 20:26:03
|
Don't know if this is the right upstream location to report this fedora bug or not, but figured I'd try. I reported this a while back: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545599 Several kernel releases later, and the lirc_imon driver still crashes. If the driver can't support this old IR-only device, maybe it shouldn't say 0aa8:8001 is a USB ID it can talk to? |
From: Jarod W. <ja...@wi...> - 2010-02-25 19:33:17
|
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Tom Horsley <tom...@at...> wrote: > Don't know if this is the right upstream location to > report this fedora bug or not, but figured I'd try. > > I reported this a while back: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545599 > > Several kernel releases later, and the lirc_imon driver > still crashes. > > If the driver can't support this old IR-only device, > maybe it shouldn't say 0aa8:8001 is a USB ID it > can talk to? Hadn't seen the bz until just now. That device *is* supported. There's a bug in the code that is in the 2.6.31 Fedora kernels. I think its fixed in the 2.6.32 builds, which some day, will make it from updates-testing limbo to updates... -- Jarod Wilson ja...@wi... |