From: <li...@ba...> - 2010-02-28 08:00:49
|
Hi! Daniel Åkerud "dan...@gm..." wrote: > With the current gap value, holding a button gives: > > 28b595b700000000 00 1 IMON_KNOB_64 > 28b595b700000000 00 1 IMON_KNOB_64 <-- > 28b595b700000000 01 1 IMON_KNOB_64 > 28b595b700000000 02 1 IMON_KNOB_64 > > because a release event is triggered when it shouldn't. It's somewhere > between 360 and 370 ms, and I put 370 ms just to be sure. Does that mean that the first gap is different from the rest? Christoph |
From: Daniel Å. <dan...@gm...> - 2010-02-28 14:44:34
|
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Christoph Bartelmus <li...@ba...>wrote: > Hi! > > Daniel Åkerud "dan...@gm..." wrote: > > > With the current gap value, holding a button gives: > > > > 28b595b700000000 00 1 IMON_KNOB_64 > > 28b595b700000000 00 1 IMON_KNOB_64 <-- > > 28b595b700000000 01 1 IMON_KNOB_64 > > 28b595b700000000 02 1 IMON_KNOB_64 > > > > because a release event is triggered when it shouldn't. It's somewhere > > between 360 and 370 ms, and I put 370 ms just to be sure. > > Does that mean that the first gap is different from the rest? > > Christoph > > > Good thinking there, yes they are. Is it possible to project that in lircd.conf? /D |
From: <li...@ba...> - 2010-03-07 12:10:14
|
Hi! Daniel Åkerud "dan...@gm..." wrote: > On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Christoph Bartelmus > <li...@ba...>wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Daniel Åkerud "dan...@gm..." wrote: >> >>> With the current gap value, holding a button gives: >>> >>> 28b595b700000000 00 1 IMON_KNOB_64 >>> 28b595b700000000 00 1 IMON_KNOB_64 <-- >>> 28b595b700000000 01 1 IMON_KNOB_64 >>> 28b595b700000000 02 1 IMON_KNOB_64 >>> >>> because a release event is triggered when it shouldn't. It's somewhere >>> between 360 and 370 ms, and I put 370 ms just to be sure. >> >> Does that mean that the first gap is different from the rest? >> >> Christoph >> >> >> > Good thinking there, yes they are. Is it possible to project that in > lircd.conf? Not really but in 0.8.6 you can specify a gap range that is accepted simply by putting two values behind the "gap" token. I think the first one must be the lower bound. Christoph |