From: leif g. <le...@gm...> - 2003-02-23 12:34:06
|
i have a ati radeon 8500 and i want to use radeonfb for my framebuffer it actually works with the atyfb module and lilo.conf lines "vga=792" and append="video=atyfb:mode:1024x768,font:SUN12x22" vesafb also works. ok first stupid question: does it make sense to use radeonfb when i use radeonfb i framebuffer starts but i only get 640x480 on my console. what am i doing wrong? i tried everything "video=radeonfb:mode:1024x768,font:SUN12x22" does not work without append it does not work and "video=atyfb:mode:1024x768,font:SUN12x22" doesn't work neither. can you help me mfg leifg |
From: Antonino D. <ad...@po...> - 2003-02-23 21:33:52
|
On Sun, 2003-02-23 at 20:33, leif gensert wrote: > i have a ati radeon 8500 and i want to use radeonfb for my framebuffer > > it actually works with the atyfb module and lilo.conf lines "vga=792" and append="video=atyfb:mode:1024x768,font:SUN12x22" vesafb also works. > > ok first stupid question: > does it make sense to use radeonfb atyfb and radeonfb seems to have overlapping device support (R100's, R200's and RV200's at least). Choose which works best for you. > > when i use radeonfb i framebuffer starts but i only get 640x480 on my console. what am i doing wrong? i tried everything "video=radeonfb:mode:1024x768,font:SUN12x22" does not work without append it does not work and "video=atyfb:mode:1024x768,font:SUN12x22" doesn't work neither. > The mode: parameter is not needed. Try: "video=radeonfb":font:SUN12x22,1024x768 Tony |
From: Miles L. <mil...@at...> - 2003-02-23 23:04:00
|
I cannot get the agp/framebuffer code in the linuxppc 2.5 tree to compile. Is anyone working on this? Miles |
From: James S. <jsi...@in...> - 2003-02-25 16:28:09
|
> I cannot get the agp/framebuffer code in the linuxppc 2.5 tree to > compile. > Is anyone working on this? What is your config? |
From: Miles L. <mil...@at...> - 2003-02-26 07:52:40
|
On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 08:27, James Simmons wrote: > > > I cannot get the agp/framebuffer code in the linuxppc 2.5 tree to > > compile. > > Is anyone working on this? > > What is your config? > I am building the source from "rsync -avz source.mvista.com::linuxppc-2.5 ." CONFIG_AGP=y CONFIG_DRM=y CONFIG_DRM_RADEON=y gcc -Wp,-MD,drivers/char/agp/.backend.o.d -D__KERNEL__ -Iinclude -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -I/mnt/ext3/usr/src/linux-2.5/arch/ppc -msoft-float -pipe -ffixed-r2 -Wno-uninitialized -mmultiple -mstring -fomit-frame-pointer -nostdinc -iwithprefix include -DKBUILD_BASENAME=backend -DKBUILD_MODNAME=agpgart -c -o drivers/char/agp/backend.o drivers/char/agp/backend.c In file included from drivers/char/agp/backend.c:39: drivers/char/agp/agp.h:31: asm/agp.h: No such file or directory In file included from drivers/char/agp/backend.c:39: drivers/char/agp/agp.h: In function `global_cache_flush': drivers/char/agp/agp.h:52: warning: implicit declaration of function `flush_agp_cache' In a Titanium PowerBook 800MHz G4: (--) PCI:*(0:16:0) ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Mobility M7 LW [Radeon Mobility 7500] rev 0, Mem @ 0xb8000000/27, 0xb0000000/16, I/O @ 0x0400/8, BIOS @ 0xb0020000/17 mode "1280x854-60" # D: 79.815 MHz, H: 51.963 kHz, V: 60.003 Hz geometry 1280 854 1280 854 32 timings 12529 128 16 8 1 112 3 rgba 8/16,8/8,8/0,0/0 endmode 00:0b.0 Host bridge: Apple Computer Inc.: Unknown device 002d Flags: bus master, 66Mhz, medium devsel, latency 16 Capabilities: [80] AGP version 1.0 00:10.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 4c57 (prog-if 00 [VGA]) Subsystem: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 4c57 Flags: bus master, stepping, 66Mhz, medium devsel, latency 255, IRQ 48 Memory at b8000000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=128M] I/O ports at 802400 [size=256] Memory at b0000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64K] Expansion ROM at b0020000 [disabled] [size=128K] Capabilities: [58] AGP version 2.0 Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2 10:0b.0 Host bridge: Apple Computer Inc.: Unknown device 002e Flags: bus master, 66Mhz, medium devsel, latency 16 10:17.0 Class ff00: Apple Computer Inc. KeyLargo Mac I/O (rev 03) Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 16 Memory at 80000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=512K] 10:18.0 USB Controller: Apple Computer Inc. KeyLargo USB (prog-if 10 [OHCI]) Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 16, IRQ 27 Memory at a0002000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] 10:19.0 USB Controller: Apple Computer Inc. KeyLargo USB (prog-if 10 [OHCI]) Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 16, IRQ 28 Memory at a0001000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] 10:1a.0 CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI1410 PC card Cardbus Controller (rev 02) Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 168, IRQ 58 Memory at a0000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] Bus: primary=10, secondary=11, subordinate=14, sec-latency=176 Memory window 0: 90000000-9ffff000 (prefetchable) Memory window 1: f3000000-f33ff000 I/O window 0: 00001000-00008fff I/O window 1: 00009000-000090ff 16-bit legacy interface ports at 0001 24:0b.0 Host bridge: Apple Computer Inc.: Unknown device 002f Flags: bus master, 66Mhz, medium devsel, latency 16 24:0e.0 Class ffff: Lucent Microelectronics: Unknown device 5811 (rev ff) (prog-if ff) !!! Unknown header type 7f 24:0f.0 Class ffff: Apple Computer Inc. UniNorth GMAC (rev ff) (prog-if ff) !!! Unknown header type 7f |
From: Antonino D. <ad...@po...> - 2003-02-26 08:40:19
Attachments:
agp.h
|
On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 15:52, Miles Lane wrote: > On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 08:27, James Simmons wrote: > > > > > I cannot get the agp/framebuffer code in the linuxppc 2.5 tree to > > > compile. > > > Is anyone working on this? > > > > What is your config? > > > > I am building the source from "rsync -avz > source.mvista.com::linuxppc-2.5 ." > > CONFIG_AGP=y > CONFIG_DRM=y > CONFIG_DRM_RADEON=y > The agp code has a lot of x86-specific stuff in it. Try to add the attached file (agp.h) to your linux/include/asm. It just contains empty functions for the x86-specific stuff. The agp code might compile, whether it works, I don't know. BTW, does agp work for the ppc in 2.4.x? Tony |
From: Dave J. <da...@su...> - 2003-02-26 10:42:34
|
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 04:40:55PM +0800, Antonino Daplas wrote: > The agp code has a lot of x86-specific stuff in it. 2.5 also has alpha support. > Try to add the attached file (agp.h) to your linux/include/asm. It just > contains empty functions for the x86-specific stuff. The agp code might > compile, whether it works, I don't know. Unlikely. Theres no code to frob that apple bridge, and without documentation, it's unlikely to happen. I think benh was looking at this not so long ago, but I've not seen generic agpgart patches from him or any other of the ppc folks. Dave -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs |
From: Miles L. <mil...@at...> - 2003-02-26 10:53:31
|
On Wednesday, February 26, 2003, at 02:42 AM, Dave Jones wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 04:40:55PM +0800, Antonino Daplas wrote: > >> The agp code has a lot of x86-specific stuff in it. > > 2.5 also has alpha support. > >> Try to add the attached file (agp.h) to your linux/include/asm. It >> just >> contains empty functions for the x86-specific stuff. The agp code >> might >> compile, whether it works, I don't know. > > Unlikely. Theres no code to frob that apple bridge, and without > documentation, it's unlikely to happen. I think benh was looking > at this not so long ago, but I've not seen generic agpgart patches > from him or any other of the ppc folks. Should the agp option be disabled for the ppc architecture, then? Miles |
From: Dave J. <da...@su...> - 2003-02-26 11:03:50
|
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 02:53:25AM -0800, Miles Lane wrote: > Should the agp option be disabled for the ppc architecture, then? ISTR some ppc's had VIA chipsets, so maybe not. Only the ppc folks will know for sure. Dave -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs |
From: Geert U. <ge...@li...> - 2003-02-26 11:12:38
|
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Dave Jones wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 02:53:25AM -0800, Miles Lane wrote: > > Should the agp option be disabled for the ppc architecture, then? > > ISTR some ppc's had VIA chipsets, so maybe not. > Only the ppc folks will know for sure. AFAIK the used VIA chips are South Bridges only, not North Bridges. Hence no VIA AGP. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@li... In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds |
From: leif g. <le...@gm...> - 2003-02-23 22:49:57
|
it still does not work :( do you know where i can get info about radeonfb? mfg leif gensert On 24 Feb 2003 05:34:05 +0800 Antonino Daplas <ad...@po...> wrote: > On Sun, 2003-02-23 at 20:33, leif gensert wrote: > > i have a ati radeon 8500 and i want to use radeonfb for my framebuffer > > > > it actually works with the atyfb module and lilo.conf lines "vga=792" and append="video=atyfb:mode:1024x768,font:SUN12x22" vesafb also works. > > > > ok first stupid question: > > does it make sense to use radeonfb > > atyfb and radeonfb seems to have overlapping device support (R100's, > R200's and RV200's at least). Choose which works best for you. > > > > > when i use radeonfb i framebuffer starts but i only get 640x480 on my console. what am i doing wrong? i tried everything "video=radeonfb:mode:1024x768,font:SUN12x22" does not work without append it does not work and "video=atyfb:mode:1024x768,font:SUN12x22" doesn't work neither. > > > > The mode: parameter is not needed. Try: > > "video=radeonfb":font:SUN12x22,1024x768 > > Tony > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge. > The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use. > Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial. > www.slickedit.com/sourceforge > _______________________________________________ > Linux-fbdev-users mailing list > Lin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-fbdev-users > |
From: Antonino D. <ad...@po...> - 2003-02-23 23:38:29
|
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 06:49, leif gensert wrote: > it still does not work :( > My mistake. The radeonfb needs "video=radeon:", ie without the 'fb'. "video=radeon:1024x768" Tony |
From: James S. <jsi...@in...> - 2003-02-26 19:32:04
|
> On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 06:49, leif gensert wrote: > > it still does not work :( > > > My mistake. The radeonfb needs "video=radeon:", ie without the 'fb'. > > "video=radeon:1024x768" Perhaps we should convert them all to end with fb? |