From: Alexander K. <ale...@gm...> - 2004-01-17 00:20:51
Attachments:
accel_imgblit.patch
|
Hi, here is a patch. Now it works with SUN12x22 font and 8, 16 and 32 bpp. I have the strange issues with 24bpp. Should we simply drop acceleration for this resolution? Regards Alex |
From: Geert U. <ge...@li...> - 2004-01-17 18:25:31
|
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Alexander Kern wrote: > here is a patch. Now it works with SUN12x22 font and 8, 16 and 32 bpp. I have > the strange issues with 24bpp. Should we simply drop acceleration for this > resolution? All acceleration, or just the imageblit? I don't think there's a problem with rectangle fill/copy in 24 bpp, or is there? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@li... In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds |
From: Alexander K. <ale...@gm...> - 2004-01-17 19:35:50
|
Am Samstag, 17. Januar 2004 19:25 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven: > On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Alexander Kern wrote: > > here is a patch. Now it works with SUN12x22 font and 8, 16 and 32 bpp. I > > have the strange issues with 24bpp. Should we simply drop acceleration > > for this resolution? > > All acceleration, or just the imageblit? I don't think there's a problem > with rectangle fill/copy in 24 bpp, or is there? > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert No, it's only imageblit, which has issue. Regards Alex Kern |
From: James S. <jsi...@in...> - 2004-01-19 18:11:35
|
> No, it's only imageblit, which has issue. > Regards > Alex Kern Applied your patch. I tested it and it works wonderful. I haven't tested in 24 bpp mode tho. I think that is a minor issue. |
From: Alexander K. <ale...@gm...> - 2004-01-28 21:40:38
Attachments:
20040123-mach64-include.diff
20040123-mach64.diff
|
Am Montag, 19. Januar 2004 19:11 schrieben Sie: > > No, it's only imageblit, which has issue. > > Regards > > Alex Kern > > Applied your patch. I tested it and it works wonderful. I haven't tested > in 24 bpp mode tho. I think that is a minor issue. Hi James, will you update your fbdev.diff.gz? What about resync and submit it again to mm tree? Here is one better patch for accelerated imageblit. It looks like mach64 has a problems with buildin trippler and unaligned data. Manual tripple path works now! Regards Alex |
From: James S. <jsi...@in...> - 2004-01-30 21:49:30
|
I have a new patch at http://phoenix.infradead.org/~jsimmons/fbdev.diff.gz. On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Alexander Kern wrote: > Am Montag, 19. Januar 2004 19:11 schrieben Sie: > > > No, it's only imageblit, which has issue. > > > Regards > > > Alex Kern > > > > Applied your patch. I tested it and it works wonderful. I haven't tested > > in 24 bpp mode tho. I think that is a minor issue. > Hi James, > > will you update your fbdev.diff.gz? What about resync and submit it again to > mm tree? > > Here is one better patch for accelerated imageblit. It looks like mach64 has a > problems with buildin trippler and unaligned data. Manual tripple path works > now! > > Regards Alex > |