From: Hans U. N. <gp...@n-...> - 2002-11-17 18:34:45
|
Reply-To: lib...@li... christophe barbe <chr...@ca...> writes: > Current libexif install the following file: >=20 > /usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/libexif.mo >=20 > This is problematic because you can't install simultaneously two > different releases of libexif on a given system. >=20 > It would be better to put the major somewhere in the path. For example: >=20 > /usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/libexif$(major).mo This depends on what kinds of different releases we want to support installed into the same directory hierarchy. Is the major number a good criterion for that? It shouldn't be a packager's job, that is sure. > I don't know if this i18n file is useful. If it is perhaps we could do > an effort to get it translated in other languages. I don't know either. I run everything in LANG=3DC here :-) Gru=DF, Uli |
From: Hans U. N. <gp...@n-...> - 2002-11-19 23:29:50
|
Hans Ulrich Niedermann <gp...@n-...> writes: > GETTEXT_PACKAGE=3D'${PACKAGE}${LIBEXIF_CURRENT}' > AC_SUBST(GETTEXT_PACKAGE) > > But should this be: > > GETTEXT_PACKAGE=3D'${PACKAGE}'"$(expr ${LIBEXIF_CURRENT} + ${LIBEXIF_REVI= SION})" > AC_SUBST(GETTEXT_PACKAGE) > > Or even more version details? Simply ${PACKAGE}-${VERSION}? Christophe? Is current libexif CVS OK? Or the RC1 tarball I put up on http://n-dimensional.de/releases/ ? Gru=DF, Uli |