From: Alan G. <ag...@sp...> - 2009-04-25 22:48:13
|
Could someone please remind me what the difference is between ECconnector and Electronic connector and why they are separate. -- thanx. =) -- New president: Here we go again... Chemistry.com: A total rip-off. Powers are not rights. |
From: P Z. <zol...@gm...> - 2009-04-26 07:42:39
|
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 23:41:20 +0200, Alan Grimes <ag...@sp...> wrote: > Could someone please remind me what the difference is between > ECconnector and Electronic connector and why they are separate. -- > thanx. =) > > Where have you find "ECconnector"? I don't know about such class. There exists Connector, which is a generic connector and ElectronicConnector, which is a inherided from connector and is used in circuits. For flowparts there exists FlowConnector. These types were created to separate the flowparts and the electronic part; the source code easier to manage of a connector type appeares only in one kind of document. |
From: Alan G. <ag...@sp...> - 2009-04-26 15:07:06
|
P Zoltan wrote: >> Could someone please remind me what the difference is between >> ECconnector and Electronic connector and why they are separate. -- >> thanx. =) > Where have you find "ECconnector"? I don't know about such class. > There exists Connector, which is a generic connector and > ElectronicConnector, which is a inherided from connector and is used in > circuits. For flowparts there exists FlowConnector. These types were > created to separate the flowparts and the electronic part; the source code > easier to manage of a connector type appeares only in one kind of document. Apparently I have been maintaining a number of derelict classes that SVN has long since forgotten about, or possibly ones that I had written, never finished, and then forgot. -- New president: Here we go again... Chemistry.com: A total rip-off. Powers are not rights. |