Thread: [Komport-devel] CVS setup
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
msharkey
From: Mark <mb...@ya...> - 2003-11-20 02:03:39
|
Hi everyone, As Mike mentioned, I am going to set up the CVS repository. I've started the prep on SourceForge and wanted to get some impressions prior to my committing any information. I've done some review of their documents and will try and get the most of what they allow. Particularly dealing with the issue about CVS through SSH which requiring constant password prompts (from my understanding at least.) To try and keep things separated, I figured the best structure was 3 modules so everyone has a separate module. To make it logical, I figured the following would work best (somewhat from experience): src - the source to komport www - the web site on SF dist - this would be for the packaging of what is released To keep things easy, I'll keep the src directory as the tar which was provided as the initial release. (In the future, I'll see if SF allows some tasks where I can tar the source and put a copy in the dist directory. Assuming it works for everyone.) Any suggestions or thoughts are welcome. Mark ______________________________________________________________________ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca |
From: Mike S. <mi...@sh...> - 2003-11-20 14:47:39
|
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 09:02 pm, Mark wrote: > As Mike mentioned, I am going to set up the CVS repository. I've started > the prep on SourceForge and wanted to get some impressions prior to my > committing any information. I've done some review of their documents and > will try and get the most of what they allow. Particularly dealing with > the issue about CVS through SSH which requiring constant password prompts > (from my understanding at least.) Yeah, I read a little about that ssh deal on sourceforge and it did not sound that cool to me from a convenience standpoint as I would like to use the CVS functions in KDevelop it does not sound to me that they will work with that setup, but I didn't go into it in great detail so perhaps I missed something. I think to get things started, maybe we should just try getting everything in CVS on sourceforge, then I'll merge in my recent changes, and then maybe we can try doing a complete build from sourceforge CVS and just see how the whole process goes and what problems we run into. Then I think we should make a decision if it's working for us or not. If we decide at that point that it's not working well enough for day to day CVS use, then there is the option of setting up a CVS server on sharkey.servebeer.com for our daily use (maybe using the firewall to limit access to our IP address ranges only), then once in a while mirror it onto sourceforge, probably a daily cron script could do that. Does that sound like a reasonable approach? > > To try and keep things separated, I figured the best structure was 3 > modules so everyone has a separate module. To make it logical, I figured > the following would work best (somewhat from experience): > > src - the source to komport > www - the web site on SF > dist - this would be for the packaging of what is released > > To keep things easy, I'll keep the src directory as the tar which was > provided as the initial release. (In the future, I'll see if SF allows > some tasks where I can tar the source and put a copy in the dist directory. > Assuming it works for everyone.) I think that should be okay. > > Any suggestions or thoughts are welcome. > > Mark --Mike |
From: Robert B. <Rob...@rb...> - 2003-11-21 21:19:36
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mark wrote: | [...] To make it logical, I figured the | following | would work best (somewhat from experience): | | src - the source to komport | www - the web site on SF Is it necessary to have the website data in cvs? This is a little bit troublesome for me because I do not have practical experience in using cvs. As far as I think the source code will change more often than the website. Best regards, ~ Robert Bachmann -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/voHlrtl+VJAX6poRAsPrAJ0RFQFTYkklF68Bt2nEfHmT1AYS0gCfYx86 TyyXjLqb4tqKhsRU9l8EBoc= =rn1n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: Mike S. <mi...@sh...> - 2003-11-21 21:45:08
|
Robert, In my opinion, your reasoning is correct. I feel it's fine if you don't use CVS for the website. Also, while on the subject of the website, I think the old website files can be taken offline the next time you work on the website unless anyone can point out a good reason to keep them around. Also, I've made some significant code changes today, rewriting most of KomportView so that KomportView class is derived directly from QScrollView for various reasons which I think will be benificial moving forward. What this means is, I have some 0.5 stream changes that make some improvements that should probably go into CVS and that should be a pretty stable version for the time being. Then we're starting a new 0.6 stream with the new KomportView class, which, after major surgery is pretty much unstable. So, Mark, perhaps I should send you a tar ball of the most recent 0.5 code so you can put that into CVS as a stable stream, then as soon as I get a clean compile and run from 0.6 I can give you that and it will be unstable. Maybe we can just tag them or something "stable", and "unstable" if that makes sense to do? --Mike On Friday 21 November 2003 04:21 pm, Robert Bachmann wrote: > Is it necessary to have the website data in cvs? > > This is a little bit troublesome for me because I do not have practical > experience in using cvs. > > As far as I think the source code will change more often than the website. > > Best regards, > ~ Robert Bachmann > |
From: <skr...@f2...> - 2003-11-21 21:46:41
|
CVS is rather easy to learn, and there is a nice front end (if your using windows) called TortoiseCVS <http://www.tortoisecvs.org> so you don't have to mess around with the command line. I would suggest you give it a try, it might make your life easier in the long run. SK > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Mark wrote: > | [...] To make it logical, I figured the > | following > | would work best (somewhat from experience): > | > | src - the source to komport > | www - the web site on SF > > Is it necessary to have the website data in cvs? > > This is a little bit troublesome for me because I do not have practical > experience in using cvs. > > As far as I think the source code will change more often than the website. > > Best regards, > ~ Robert Bachmann > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQE/voHlrtl+VJAX6poRAsPrAJ0RFQFTYkklF68Bt2nEfHmT1AYS0gCfYx86 > TyyXjLqb4tqKhsRU9l8EBoc= > =rn1n > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it > help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help > YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > Komport-devel mailing list > Kom...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/komport-devel > |
From: Mike S. <mi...@sh...> - 2003-11-25 19:37:43
|
Starting in the 0.6 code stream, I would like to include an "About->Credits" form to acknowledge people that have been helping out. Anyone who does NOT want their name and/or email address included, please email me off-list. Thanks --Mike |
From: Mike S. <mi...@sh...> - 2003-11-25 19:55:56
|
Just to clarify, my intention is to include people's @user.sourceforge.net email address unless otherwise specified. --Mike On Sunday 23 November 2003 05:31 am, Mike Sharkey wrote: > Starting in the 0.6 code stream, I would like to include an > "About->Credits" form to acknowledge people that have been helping out. > Anyone who does NOT want their name and/or email address included, please > email me off-list. > > Thanks > > --Mike > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it > help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help > YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > Komport-devel mailing list > Kom...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/komport-devel |