From: Steve B. <Ste...@an...> - 2007-05-31 05:57:52
|
Hi, Daniel and I realized that the regressions are not building classpath from scratch every day, so in fact the changes I committed in r12299 have not taken effect yet (since classpath has not been rebuilt). I propose to flush classpath on rvmx86lnx32 before tomorrow's run kicks off. I suggest we refresh classpath every night. The overhead is negligible (in terms of CPU time and bandwidth). For the most part it is unnecessary, but r12299 is an example where it is an issue and I think we want the system to be testing what is in the svn head (patches and all). Daniel looks set to add another classpath patch RSN, so r12299 is not a one-off. --Steve |
From: Peter D. <pe...@re...> - 2007-05-31 06:05:47
|
On 5/31/07, Steve Blackburn <Ste...@an...> wrote: > I suggest we refresh classpath every night. The overhead is > negligible (in terms of CPU time and bandwidth). For the most part > it is unnecessary, but r12299 is an example where it is an issue and > I think we want the system to be testing what is in the svn head > (patches and all). Daniel looks set to add another classpath patch > RSN, so r12299 is not a one-off. I don't know what the story is on the AIX machines but I vaguely recall that it took a long time to build there and required some hackery to get it going. This may be able to be converted into a patch and could possibly done each night but until that is done it may be best to force recompilation of classpath on the ANU machines only. -- Cheers, Peter Donald |
From: Steve B. <Ste...@an...> - 2007-05-31 06:16:19
|
On 31/05/2007, at 4:05 PM, Peter Donald wrote: > I don't know what the story is on the AIX machines but OK. Thanks for the heads up. Dave, what's the status with AIX? --Steve |
From: David P G. <gr...@us...> - 2007-05-31 12:01:42
|
> I suggest we refresh classpath every night. The overhead is > negligible (in terms of CPU time and bandwidth). For the most part > it is unnecessary, but r12299 is an example where it is an issue and > I think we want the system to be testing what is in the svn head > (patches and all). Daniel looks set to add another classpath patch > RSN, so r12299 is not a one-off. We can't do this on AIX until I get some other patches in place. Classpath doesn't build cleanly on AIX. --dave |