You can subscribe to this list here.
2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(3) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(2) |
2008 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(19) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(37) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
|
2009 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(14) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(31) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(6) |
Dec
|
2010 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
(18) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(11) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(1) |
2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Brett S. <sim...@ya...> - 2007-01-17 18:24:29
|
I have successfully setup imspector with mysql and reallylike it. However I was wondering if it’s possible to set it up so that itcan monitor a span interface instead of running inline in a transparentconfiguration. My concern is if the daemon or the server crashes then userswouldn’t be able to send instant messages. If it can’t be configured then would it be possible toconfigure iptables to redirect the copied traffic on the span into imspectorand use another iptables rule to block it from transmitting? Brett --------------------------------- Be a PS3 game guru. Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games. |
From: Lawrence M. <law...@as...> - 2007-01-07 19:29:31
|
On 5 Jan 2007, at 14:10, Sebastian Nu=F1ez wrote: > Hi! my name is Sebastian. I from Uruguay. I have a question about the > imspector software and maybe you can help me. I have installed > imspector and i put the rule in iptables for logging msn traffic. But, > in the same machine i start a msn client and i can't see any logging. > This is correct? I mean, imspector not work in a single machine? =20 > Should > i install on a diferent machine? Yes you need to install it on the gateway machine, not on the machine =20= running the clients. It wont work if you put imspector on the same =20 box as the client. Lawrence |
From: <se...@ad...> - 2007-01-05 14:10:55
|
Hi! my name is Sebastian. I from Uruguay. I have a question about the imspector software and maybe you can help me. I have installed imspector and i put the rule in iptables for logging msn traffic. But, in the same machine i start a msn client and i can't see any logging. This is correct? I mean, imspector not work in a single machine? Should i install on a diferent machine? regards Sebastian |
From: Lawrence M. <law...@as...> - 2006-12-29 12:18:19
|
Hi, I'm keen to add Jabber support to IMSpector. It's probably the last mainstream protocol that IMSpector knows nothing about. I have done abit of research and I think the protocol should be fairly easy to parse out using the expat XML library, but the problem is I don't know anyone who uses it. Does anyone on the list use it, and if so could I use the same server? How does one get accounts on a Jabber server? All my brief testing has been done with a private server with basically just me on it. Please feel free to post anything you like. Crazy feature ideas, requests etc. I am interested to hear from anyone willing to say how they are using IMSpector and why. Lawrence |
From: Lawrence M. <law...@as...> - 2006-12-19 13:19:25
|
> In the TODO list, i don't see any mention of encryption - this would be > one of > the key advantages to a transparent IM proxy, IMHO - have you put any > thought > into adding that functionality? > > My entire office uses MSN messenger, and often exchanges confidential data > over it. I would like to protect this communication channel, but am > realistic enough to know i'll never get everyone to change clients. I > would > rather not go to draconian lengths of blocking the ports, and barring all > traffic through the proxy to force everyone to change to a new client: a > tranparent encrypting proxy would be the perfect solution.... I like the idea. It is certainly worth adding to the TODO. I imagine it is quite a large amount of work however, so I wouldn't expect to see it soon... :( BTW, you should join the mailing list before posting. Send a message with the subject "subscribe" to ims...@li... Lawrence |
From: Gareth H. <gar...@mi...> - 2006-12-19 11:14:25
|
In the TODO list, i don't see any mention of encryption - this would be one of the key advantages to a transparent IM proxy, IMHO - have you put any thought into adding that functionality? My entire office uses MSN messenger, and often exchanges confidential data over it. I would like to protect this communication channel, but am realistic enough to know i'll never get everyone to change clients. I would rather not go to draconian lengths of blocking the ports, and barring all traffic through the proxy to force everyone to change to a new client: a tranparent encrypting proxy would be the perfect solution.... -- Gareth Humphries Mobile Interactive Group gar...@mi... DDI: +44 (0)207 921 5574 MOB: +44 (0)789 425 3544 |