From: Joe R. J. <jj...@cl...> - 2001-12-05 07:02:49
|
Hi Gilles, In absence of htdig-notification-date meta tag in any document, htdig could add a number to the document date and use it instead. The number could be set to 180 days by default, and set in htdig.conf. In absence of htdig-email meta tag in any document, htdig could use the Link tag or Maintainer meta tag instead; if they were all absent, htdig could use a htdig-email set in htdig.conf. It could be set to maintainer by default. Only if set to blank, no notification would be sent in absence of all of the above. Regards, Joe -- _/ _/_/_/ _/ ____________ __o _/ _/ _/ _/ ______________ _-\<,_ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ ......(_)/ (_) _/_/ oe _/ _/. _/_/ ah jj...@cl... |
From: Gilles D. <gr...@sc...> - 2001-12-06 22:57:25
|
According to Joe R. Jah: > Hi Gilles, > > In absence of htdig-notification-date meta tag in any document, htdig > could add a number to the document date and use it instead. The number > could be set to 180 days by default, and set in htdig.conf. Interesting idea, but there's no way the default would be set to anything that would activate this. If we did that, then by default htnotify (and therefore rundig) would send out e-mail notices for all documents that haven't been updated in about 6 months. Do you really think the average htdig user would want this by default? > In absence of htdig-email meta tag in any document, htdig could use the > Link tag or Maintainer meta tag instead; if they were all absent, htdig > could use a htdig-email set in htdig.conf. It could be set to maintainer > by default. Only if set to blank, no notification would be sent in > absence of all of the above. Again, an interesting idea. Good items for a wish list, but not for 3.1.6 IMHO. At least, neither Geoff nor I would likely have the time or inclination to implement this ourselves, and we're not holding up its release for any wish list items that can't be done in short order. So, if you can find someone to implement these in the next couple weeks and submit them to us, I'd certainly consider them, but otherwise they'll just go on a wish list for 3.2. -- Gilles R. Detillieux E-mail: <gr...@sc...> Spinal Cord Research Centre WWW: http://www.scrc.umanitoba.ca/~grdetil Dept. Physiology, U. of Manitoba Phone: (204)789-3766 Winnipeg, MB R3E 3J7 (Canada) Fax: (204)789-3930 |