#10 Logging: "Fatal: operator << not implemented" when -llevel=A

open
nobody
core (19)
5
2014-08-26
2008-06-07
Anonymous
No

Trying to execute client from radius-env.

$uname -a
Linux will.deb 2.6.18-3-686 #1 SMP Mon Dec 4 16:41:14 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux

$ g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)

Client started with 'repository' settings with radius server destination adress changed only.

Last log message:

2008-06-07.13:18:11.274|A|START log
2008-06-07.13:18:11.275|A|Platform use LITTLE_ENDIAN coding
2008-06-07.13:18:11.275|A|Integer32 Type size is: 4
2008-06-07.13:18:11.275|A|Integer64 Type size is: 8
2008-06-07.13:18:11.275|A|Configuration data:
| |option_log_file [../logs/radius-accounting.client.log]
| |option_conf_file [../config/conf.client.xml]
| |option_dico_file [../config/radius-accounting.xml]
| |option_scen_file [../scenario/radius-accounting.client.xml]
| |log_stat_file [../logs/client-stat.csv]
| |option_log_level [A]
| |option_bg_mode [false]
| |call_rate [1]
| |burst_limit [0]
| |max_send [200]
| |max_receive [200]
| |select_timeout [50]
| |max_simult_calls [2000]
| |call_timeout_ms [10000]
| |msg_buffer_size [4096]
| |display_period [1]
| |log_stat_period [1]
| |resp_time_repart [50,75,100,150,300,5000]
| |number_calls [0]
| |notimelog [false]
| |msg check [false]
| |msg check mask [P]
| |check behaviour [warning]
| |call rate scale [1]
| |model traffic [best-effort]
| |external data file [../scenario/external_client_data.csv]
| |external data select [sequential]
2008-06-07.13:18:11.277|E|No protocol found for this name [al]
2008-06-07.13:18:11.277|A|PID [13254]
2008-06-07.13:18:11.278|E|Open channel failed
2008-06-07.13:18:11.278|T|Send error on call with session-id [0]
2008-06-07.13:18:11.278|T|Execution error on call with session-id [0]
2008-06-07.13:18:11.278|V|Error Send message: Scenario failed call-id [Fatal: operator << not implemented

Discussion

  • willkins
    willkins
    2008-06-07

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=2110633
    Originator: NO

    to be exact: problem with 'llevel V'