From: Matteo V. <mve...@gm...> - 2011-06-24 08:04:44
|
Hi all. I'm repeating something I already asked for in IRC channel, but no reply there. I received a bug report (http://bugs.debian.org/631293) querying if there is any timeframe when the 2.1 branch (using GTK3) would be declared stable. We need to know that to define the switch process between the experimental distribution and the unstable one in Debian. Let me know. Thanks. mfv -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. |
From: Matteo V. <mve...@gm...> - 2011-06-25 14:27:14
|
On 24/06/2011 21:48, phantomjinx wrote: > > Matteo, > > Just looked at the dsc on mentors.debian. > > Due to the plugin environment, I wondered if a slightly more distributed > packaging was appropriate. My experimenting, a couple of months back, > produced a ppa for ubuntu maverick -> > > http://ppa.launchpad.net/phantomjinx/gtkpod-2.0.1-beta/ubuntu/pool/main/g/gtkpod/ Yep, I remembered that you splitted the plugins from the main package when I gave a look at the debian/ dir in your ubuntu source package. > This is on similar lines to how I have done it for rpms on Fedora. > > What do you think? I decided not to split the plugins for two reasons: * it was the original approach used by the former maintainer (and it could be questionable any time); * the package isn't so complicated and space-consuming to be in need of a split of few plugins, as it would force the final users to discover and understand which plugin they have to install for the feature they want. Monolithic is better this time, I guess. :-P Time will say which was the best approach ;-) Hope to see a brand new shining 2.1.0 soon in the repos :-) > Cheers > > PGR Regards, mfv -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. |
From: phantomjinx <p.g...@ph...> - 2011-06-25 21:38:32
|
Bad news on the testing front for 2.1.0. My server hard disk is failing so have ordered a new one but it will be a week before I am back up in a position for testing. If anyone has mageia installed and can verify the latest bug report 3323692 concerning 2.1 then I would be grateful. The latest unstable is the first beta in all but name. Cheers Phantomjinx wrote: > -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. |