Menu

#211 Current version: does not start scanner detection

v1.0_(example)
closed-fixed
nobody
None
5
2015-10-05
2015-10-01
Wikinaut
No

361dcf75198f9def03bb9dbcfa28022f06470d20 is the last commit, which works on my i5 (2core/4thread) CPU i5 4250U https://www-ssl.intel.com/content/www/us/en/nuc/nuc-kit-d54250wykh.html

Next commit does not start the scanner detection.

Discussion

  • Wikinaut

    Wikinaut - 2015-10-02

    This window is shown when I click onto "scan"

    in all versions after 361dcf75198f9def03bb9dbcfa28022f06470d20

     
  • Jeffrey Ratcliffe

    Fixed in 1c1e257f. Thanks for the report.

     

    Last edit: Jeffrey Ratcliffe 2015-10-04
  • Jeffrey Ratcliffe

    • status: open --> closed-fixed
     
  • Wikinaut

    Wikinaut - 2015-10-04

    I confirm, that this is fixed now (and scanning works).

    However, after gscan2pdf has found the device, there is a new status message shown, which is not automatically deleted:

    "Option resolution wird eingestellt."

    I don't know what exactly is meant. whether it is a bug or what else - perhaps you mean that the Scan Mode Settings are now opened and the user can start scanning?

     
  • Jeffrey Ratcliffe

    I agree that the message is misleading. In your case, it looks like a poor translation. The English would be something like "setting option resolution" and is meant as a progress report in case the process takes more than half a second.

     

    Last edit: Jeffrey Ratcliffe 2015-10-04
  • Wikinaut

    Wikinaut - 2015-10-04

    I don't understand. Is the message related to a (programatic) setting of the scanner, or is it related to the Mode Setting Dialog Window (where the user can modify the parameters ?)

    If case 1, then that's in my view a bug, because the message is not cleared (it should be cleared after a while). On my system, it stays until I actually start scanning. Only opening the Mode Setting Dialog Window does not clear the message.

     
  • Jeffrey Ratcliffe

    It's a bug. The message should be cleared. It looks as though the code clearing it is being excuted too early.

     
  • Jeffrey Ratcliffe

    I've just pushed a fix.

     

Log in to post a comment.