From: David L. <dav...@vi...> - 2012-06-04 19:04:10
|
Since upgrading (to 3.4.1 on Windows), the gender of new people is no longer assigned automatically (to the gender of a person with the same Christian name as someone already my tree). This applies whether the name was first assigned in 3.4 or first assigned earlier. Has this feature been deliberately removed in 3.4 or is it a bug in 3.4? David Lynch |
From: Benny M. <ben...@gm...> - 2012-06-11 08:35:22
|
Please post a bug ticket of your observation. It should not have been deliberately removed I think. Benny 2012/6/4 David Lynch <dav...@vi...> > Since upgrading (to 3.4.1 on Windows), the gender of new people is no > longer assigned automatically (to the gender of a person with the same > Christian name as someone already my tree). This applies whether the name > was first assigned in 3.4 or first assigned earlier. Has this feature been > deliberately removed in 3.4 or is it a bug in 3.4? > > David Lynch > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Gramps-users mailing list > Gra...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-users > > |
From: Jérôme <rom...@ya...> - 2012-06-12 06:51:38
|
Note, I far I understand, Gramps database (a Family Tree) will store a tempory given/gender index. See 'DumpGenderStats' debug tool: http://gramps.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/gramps/branches/maintenance/gramps34/src/plugins/tool/DumpGenderStats.py http://gramps.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/gramps/branches/maintenance/gramps34/src/plugins/tool/toolsdebug.gpr.py To automaticaly assign/guess a gender means this gender is already associated with this given name into the database. Did you create a new database for 3.4 or did you upgrade it? Benny Malengier a écrit : > Please post a bug ticket of your observation. > It should not have been deliberately removed I think. > > Benny > > 2012/6/4 David Lynch <dav...@vi... > <mailto:dav...@vi...>> > > Since upgrading (to 3.4.1 on Windows), the gender of new people is > no longer assigned automatically (to the gender of a person with the > same Christian name as someone already my tree). This applies > whether the name was first assigned in 3.4 or first assigned > earlier. Has this feature been deliberately removed in 3.4 or is it > a bug in 3.4? > > David Lynch > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. > Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in > malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Gramps-users mailing list > Gra...@li... > <mailto:Gra...@li...> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-users > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Gramps-users mailing list > Gra...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-users |
From: Ron J. <ron...@co...> - 2012-06-11 15:59:19
|
Are there any changes in the pipeline to handle same-sex adoptions and marriages? On 06/11/2012 03:35 AM, Benny Malengier wrote: > Please post a bug ticket of your observation. > It should not have been deliberately removed I think. > > Benny > > 2012/6/4 David Lynch<dav...@vi...> > >> Since upgrading (to 3.4.1 on Windows), the gender of new people is no >> longer assigned automatically (to the gender of a person with the same >> Christian name as someone already my tree). This applies whether the name >> was first assigned in 3.4 or first assigned earlier. Has this feature been >> deliberately removed in 3.4 or is it a bug in 3.4? >> >> David Lynch >> -- "There is usually only a limited amount of damage that can be done by dull or stupid people. For creating a truly monumental disaster, you need people with high IQs." Thomas Sowell |
From: Doug B. <dou...@gm...> - 2012-06-11 18:38:50
|
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Ron Johnson <ron...@co...> wrote: > Are there any changes in the pipeline to handle same-sex adoptions and > marriages? For many same-sex relationships, it should be the case that Gramps works fine (eg, you can enter and store the data), although the terminology (Wife/Husband or Father/Mother) is either "wrong" or at the least awkward. There are some related discussions here: http://www.gramps-project.org/bugs/view.php?id=3346 http://www.gramps-project.org/bugs/view.php?id=5730 It looks like this could be handled in three parts: 1) make the gender field behave like other gramps types and allow "custom" values (requires database change) 2) make the user interface less awkward (may need more information stored in a family, such as "parent1_name") 3) adjust reports and other code to allow changes above For further discussion, probably better to move this to the developers' list, or comment on the issue tracker items. -Doug > > On 06/11/2012 03:35 AM, Benny Malengier wrote: >> Please post a bug ticket of your observation. >> It should not have been deliberately removed I think. >> >> Benny >> >> 2012/6/4 David Lynch<dav...@vi...> >> >>> Since upgrading (to 3.4.1 on Windows), the gender of new people is no >>> longer assigned automatically (to the gender of a person with the same >>> Christian name as someone already my tree). This applies whether the name >>> was first assigned in 3.4 or first assigned earlier. Has this feature been >>> deliberately removed in 3.4 or is it a bug in 3.4? >>> >>> David Lynch >>> > > > -- > "There is usually only a limited amount of damage that can be > done by dull or stupid people. For creating a truly monumental > disaster, you need people with high IQs." > Thomas Sowell > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Gramps-users mailing list > Gra...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-users |