From: Stéphane C. <ste...@gm...> - 2010-04-22 21:21:14
|
So I believe we need to start co-ordinating the Gramps 3.2.2 release. We have a NarrativeWeb and/or a python problem introduced in 3.2.1. I'm being vague on purpose because I've just skimmed the e-mails and I actually don't know exactly what has broken. I did login to Mantis today to try and clear out and manage the 3.2.2 roadmap, but I've never done that before and couldn't figure out how to even mark the 3.2.1 release as being shipped. What I would love to have is a very clear and precise way to tell when it is safe to build 3.2.2 again. This can be done by e-mail, or using the roadmap. How urgent is this release? If we want it very quickly, then we don't want a dozen things in this release. I'm guessing all these items were assigned to 3.2.2 a while ago, and should be pushed out: - 0003878: [Search/Filtering] Pivate option and filter on Exporter - new. - 0003640: [File Formats] Truncated FILE media path on Gedcom export - new. - 0003735: [Interface] Undo History window crashed - new. - 0003786: [Interface] TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for -: 'NoneType' and 'int' - new. - 0003782: [Reports] Cannot set max generation on Ancestors Report (Ahnentafel) - new. - 0003785: [Interface] Unhandled exception - Undo History - ValueError: invalid tree path - new. - 0003877: [File Formats] "alive" and incomplet date - feedback. - 0002402: [Reports] Line spacing for text not correct in CairoDoc - feedback. - 0003400: [Search/Filtering] Media Files associated to living persons are not blacklisted - feedback. - 0003614: [Interface] undo gives wrong text in menu of what it will do - feedback. - 0002059: [Other] need a way to compare and merge notes - acknowledged. If no-one replies by the time I get back to it in about 8 hours, I'll move all these items out of 3.2.2 and into a future project. The next question is...do we have the necessary bug(s) created to track what we need fixed asap? Stéphane |
From: Doug B. <dou...@gm...> - 2010-04-22 21:31:58
|
2010/4/22 Stéphane Charette <ste...@gm...>: > So I believe we need to start co-ordinating the Gramps 3.2.2 release. > We have a NarrativeWeb and/or a python problem introduced in 3.2.1. > I'm being vague on purpose because I've just skimmed the e-mails and I > actually don't know exactly what has broken. > > I did login to Mantis today to try and clear out and manage the 3.2.2 > roadmap, but I've never done that before and couldn't figure out how > to even mark the 3.2.1 release as being shipped. > > What I would love to have is a very clear and precise way to tell when > it is safe to build 3.2.2 again. This can be done by e-mail, or using > the roadmap. > > How urgent is this release? If we want it very quickly, then we don't > want a dozen things in this release. I'm guessing all these items > were assigned to 3.2.2 a while ago, and should be pushed out: > > - 0003878: [Search/Filtering] Pivate option and filter on Exporter - new. > - 0003640: [File Formats] Truncated FILE media path on Gedcom export - new. > - 0003735: [Interface] Undo History window crashed - new. > - 0003786: [Interface] TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for -: > 'NoneType' and 'int' - new. > - 0003782: [Reports] Cannot set max generation on Ancestors Report > (Ahnentafel) - new. > - 0003785: [Interface] Unhandled exception - Undo History - > ValueError: invalid tree path - new. > - 0003877: [File Formats] "alive" and incomplet date - feedback. > - 0002402: [Reports] Line spacing for text not correct in CairoDoc - feedback. > - 0003400: [Search/Filtering] Media Files associated to living persons > are not blacklisted - feedback. > - 0003614: [Interface] undo gives wrong text in menu of what it will > do - feedback. > - 0002059: [Other] need a way to compare and merge notes - acknowledged. > > If no-one replies by the time I get back to it in about 8 hours, I'll > move all these items out of 3.2.2 and into a future project. > > The next question is...do we have the necessary bug(s) created to > track what we need fixed asap? No. I haven't run gramps since I noticed the issue early this morning (and I just happened to not be able to sleep for a couple of hours and was poking around sourceforge svn browser). I want to repair narweb ASAP as I spent many hours last week fixing so many things. But, please give a couple of days to let things settle, and then a couple more to test. -Doug > > Stéphane > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Gramps-devel mailing list > Gra...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel > |
From: Benny M. <ben...@gm...> - 2010-04-23 07:08:51
|
2010/4/22 Doug Blank <dou...@gm...> > 2010/4/22 Stéphane Charette <ste...@gm...>: > > So I believe we need to start co-ordinating the Gramps 3.2.2 release. > > We have a NarrativeWeb and/or a python problem introduced in 3.2.1. > > I'm being vague on purpose because I've just skimmed the e-mails and I > > actually don't know exactly what has broken. > > > > I did login to Mantis today to try and clear out and manage the 3.2.2 > > roadmap, but I've never done that before and couldn't figure out how > > to even mark the 3.2.1 release as being shipped. > > > > What I would love to have is a very clear and precise way to tell when > > it is safe to build 3.2.2 again. This can be done by e-mail, or using > > the roadmap. > > > > How urgent is this release? If we want it very quickly, then we don't > > want a dozen things in this release. I'm guessing all these items > > were assigned to 3.2.2 a while ago, and should be pushed out: > > > > - 0003878: [Search/Filtering] Pivate option and filter on Exporter - new. > > - 0003640: [File Formats] Truncated FILE media path on Gedcom export - > new. > > - 0003735: [Interface] Undo History window crashed - new. > > - 0003786: [Interface] TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for -: > > 'NoneType' and 'int' - new. > > - 0003782: [Reports] Cannot set max generation on Ancestors Report > > (Ahnentafel) - new. > > - 0003785: [Interface] Unhandled exception - Undo History - > > ValueError: invalid tree path - new. > > - 0003877: [File Formats] "alive" and incomplet date - feedback. > > - 0002402: [Reports] Line spacing for text not correct in CairoDoc - > feedback. > > - 0003400: [Search/Filtering] Media Files associated to living persons > > are not blacklisted - feedback. > > - 0003614: [Interface] undo gives wrong text in menu of what it will > > do - feedback. > > - 0002059: [Other] need a way to compare and merge notes - acknowledged. > > > > If no-one replies by the time I get back to it in about 8 hours, I'll > > move all these items out of 3.2.2 and into a future project. > > > > The next question is...do we have the necessary bug(s) created to > > track what we need fixed asap? > > No. I haven't run gramps since I noticed the issue early this morning > (and I just happened to not be able to sleep for a couple of hours and > was poking around sourceforge svn browser). > > I want to repair narweb ASAP as I spent many hours last week fixing so > many things. But, please give a couple of days to let things settle, > and then a couple more to test. > > I already reverted the change in branch32, so that should be ok at the moment. James said he will use the branch32 version of nar web for Debian, not the one in the 3.2.1 package, other packagers might do the same. In that case, those users will not be hit by the issue. If Stephen does the same for the windows installer, then that is covered too. So, I think we should ship a 3.2.2 quite quickly, but I don't think it must be this week. I'll make a 3.2.3 in the bugtracker now, so we can set up the roadmap. Benny > -Doug > > > > > Stéphane > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > > Gramps-devel mailing list > > Gra...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Gramps-devel mailing list > Gra...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel > |
From: Jérôme <rom...@ya...> - 2010-04-23 07:18:39
|
> James said he will use the branch32 version of nar web for Debian, not > the one in the 3.2.1 package, other packagers might do the same. In that > case, those users will not be hit by the issue. If Stephen does the same > for the windows installer, then that is covered too. + WebCal.py Benny Malengier a écrit : > > > 2010/4/22 Doug Blank <dou...@gm... <mailto:dou...@gm...>> > > 2010/4/22 Stéphane Charette <ste...@gm... > <mailto:ste...@gm...>>: > > So I believe we need to start co-ordinating the Gramps 3.2.2 release. > > We have a NarrativeWeb and/or a python problem introduced in 3.2.1. > > I'm being vague on purpose because I've just skimmed the e-mails > and I > > actually don't know exactly what has broken. > > > > I did login to Mantis today to try and clear out and manage the 3.2.2 > > roadmap, but I've never done that before and couldn't figure out how > > to even mark the 3.2.1 release as being shipped. > > > > What I would love to have is a very clear and precise way to tell > when > > it is safe to build 3.2.2 again. This can be done by e-mail, or > using > > the roadmap. > > > > How urgent is this release? If we want it very quickly, then we > don't > > want a dozen things in this release. I'm guessing all these items > > were assigned to 3.2.2 a while ago, and should be pushed out: > > > > - 0003878: [Search/Filtering] Pivate option and filter on > Exporter - new. > > - 0003640: [File Formats] Truncated FILE media path on Gedcom > export - new. > > - 0003735: [Interface] Undo History window crashed - new. > > - 0003786: [Interface] TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for -: > > 'NoneType' and 'int' - new. > > - 0003782: [Reports] Cannot set max generation on Ancestors Report > > (Ahnentafel) - new. > > - 0003785: [Interface] Unhandled exception - Undo History - > > ValueError: invalid tree path - new. > > - 0003877: [File Formats] "alive" and incomplet date - feedback. > > - 0002402: [Reports] Line spacing for text not correct in > CairoDoc - feedback. > > - 0003400: [Search/Filtering] Media Files associated to living > persons > > are not blacklisted - feedback. > > - 0003614: [Interface] undo gives wrong text in menu of what it will > > do - feedback. > > - 0002059: [Other] need a way to compare and merge notes - > acknowledged. > > > > If no-one replies by the time I get back to it in about 8 hours, I'll > > move all these items out of 3.2.2 and into a future project. > > > > The next question is...do we have the necessary bug(s) created to > > track what we need fixed asap? > > No. I haven't run gramps since I noticed the issue early this morning > (and I just happened to not be able to sleep for a couple of hours and > was poking around sourceforge svn browser). > > I want to repair narweb ASAP as I spent many hours last week fixing so > many things. But, please give a couple of days to let things settle, > and then a couple more to test. > > > I already reverted the change in branch32, so that should be ok at the > moment. > > James said he will use the branch32 version of nar web for Debian, not > the one in the 3.2.1 package, other packagers might do the same. In that > case, those users will not be hit by the issue. If Stephen does the same > for the windows installer, then that is covered too. > > So, I think we should ship a 3.2.2 quite quickly, but I don't think it > must be this week. > I'll make a 3.2.3 in the bugtracker now, so we can set up the roadmap. > > Benny > > > -Doug > > > > > Stéphane > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > > Gramps-devel mailing list > > Gra...@li... > <mailto:Gra...@li...> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Gramps-devel mailing list > Gra...@li... > <mailto:Gra...@li...> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Gramps-devel mailing list > Gra...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel |
From: Stephen G. <ste...@op...> - 2010-04-23 10:24:06
|
Hi, Just to clarify what I think I understand. On 23/04/2010 5:08 PM, Benny Malengier wrote: > I already reverted the change in branch32, so that should be ok at the > moment. > > James said he will use the branch32 version of nar web for Debian, not > the one in the 3.2.1 package, other packagers might do the same. In > that case, those users will not be hit by the issue. If Stephen does > the same for the windows installer, then that is covered too. > > So, I think we should ship a 3.2.2 quite quickly, but I don't think it > must be this week. > I'll make a 3.2.3 in the bugtracker now, so we can set up the roadmap. > > Benny Create 3.2.1 release, however change the files : NarrativeWeb.py WebCal.py that live in [GRAMPS_SVN]\src\plugins\webreport with the ones from the head of the 3.2 branch. So in effect it will be a patched release. Is that correct? Then by the sound of it 3.2.2 will ship in about a week or so time? Steve |
From: Doug B. <dou...@gm...> - 2010-04-23 10:39:13
|
I've tested gramps 3.2.2 in SVN (and will continue to do so) but it looks good. Everything appears to be in the state it was in as of a couple of days ago. I encourage everyone to give it a thorough going over (especially the webreports). Non-critical issues (formatting, colors, minor missing items) can go into the bug tracker for 3.2.3. Critical issues should be put in the tracker, and also sent to this list. There are a few items targeting 3.2.2 in the Roadmap: http://www.gramps-project.org/bugs/roadmap_page.php Should those be bumped to 3.2.3 and we release 3.2.2 soon? Or address those issues and release 3.2.2 in a week or two? -Doug On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Jérôme <rom...@ya...> wrote: >> James said he will use the branch32 version of nar web for Debian, not the >> one in the 3.2.1 package, other packagers might do the same. In that case, >> those users will not be hit by the issue. If Stephen does the same for the >> windows installer, then that is covered too. > > + WebCal.py > > > Benny Malengier a écrit : >> >> >> 2010/4/22 Doug Blank <dou...@gm... <mailto:dou...@gm...>> >> >> 2010/4/22 Stéphane Charette <ste...@gm... >> <mailto:ste...@gm...>>: >> > So I believe we need to start co-ordinating the Gramps 3.2.2 >> release. >> > We have a NarrativeWeb and/or a python problem introduced in 3.2.1. >> > I'm being vague on purpose because I've just skimmed the e-mails >> and I >> > actually don't know exactly what has broken. >> > >> > I did login to Mantis today to try and clear out and manage the >> 3.2.2 >> > roadmap, but I've never done that before and couldn't figure out how >> > to even mark the 3.2.1 release as being shipped. >> > >> > What I would love to have is a very clear and precise way to tell >> when >> > it is safe to build 3.2.2 again. This can be done by e-mail, or >> using >> > the roadmap. >> > >> > How urgent is this release? If we want it very quickly, then we >> don't >> > want a dozen things in this release. I'm guessing all these items >> > were assigned to 3.2.2 a while ago, and should be pushed out: >> > >> > - 0003878: [Search/Filtering] Pivate option and filter on >> Exporter - new. >> > - 0003640: [File Formats] Truncated FILE media path on Gedcom >> export - new. >> > - 0003735: [Interface] Undo History window crashed - new. >> > - 0003786: [Interface] TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for -: >> > 'NoneType' and 'int' - new. >> > - 0003782: [Reports] Cannot set max generation on Ancestors Report >> > (Ahnentafel) - new. >> > - 0003785: [Interface] Unhandled exception - Undo History - >> > ValueError: invalid tree path - new. >> > - 0003877: [File Formats] "alive" and incomplet date - feedback. >> > - 0002402: [Reports] Line spacing for text not correct in >> CairoDoc - feedback. >> > - 0003400: [Search/Filtering] Media Files associated to living >> persons >> > are not blacklisted - feedback. >> > - 0003614: [Interface] undo gives wrong text in menu of what it will >> > do - feedback. >> > - 0002059: [Other] need a way to compare and merge notes - >> acknowledged. >> > >> > If no-one replies by the time I get back to it in about 8 hours, >> I'll >> > move all these items out of 3.2.2 and into a future project. >> > >> > The next question is...do we have the necessary bug(s) created to >> > track what we need fixed asap? >> >> No. I haven't run gramps since I noticed the issue early this morning >> (and I just happened to not be able to sleep for a couple of hours and >> was poking around sourceforge svn browser). >> >> I want to repair narweb ASAP as I spent many hours last week fixing so >> many things. But, please give a couple of days to let things settle, >> and then a couple more to test. >> >> >> I already reverted the change in branch32, so that should be ok at the >> moment. >> >> James said he will use the branch32 version of nar web for Debian, not the >> one in the 3.2.1 package, other packagers might do the same. In that case, >> those users will not be hit by the issue. If Stephen does the same for the >> windows installer, then that is covered too. >> >> So, I think we should ship a 3.2.2 quite quickly, but I don't think it >> must be this week. >> I'll make a 3.2.3 in the bugtracker now, so we can set up the roadmap. >> >> Benny >> >> -Doug >> >> > >> > Stéphane >> > >> > >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Gramps-devel mailing list >> > Gra...@li... >> <mailto:Gra...@li...> >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel >> > >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> _______________________________________________ >> Gramps-devel mailing list >> Gra...@li... >> <mailto:Gra...@li...> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gramps-devel mailing list >> Gra...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel > > |
From: Benny M. <ben...@gm...> - 2010-04-23 11:01:49
|
2010/4/23 Doug Blank <dou...@gm...> > I've tested gramps 3.2.2 in SVN (and will continue to do so) but it > looks good. Everything appears to be in the state it was in as of a > couple of days ago. > > I encourage everyone to give it a thorough going over (especially the > webreports). Non-critical issues (formatting, colors, minor missing > items) can go into the bug tracker for 3.2.3. Critical issues should > be put in the tracker, and also sent to this list. > > There are a few items targeting 3.2.2 in the Roadmap: > > http://www.gramps-project.org/bugs/roadmap_page.php > > Should those be bumped to 3.2.3 and we release 3.2.2 soon? Or address > those issues and release 3.2.2 in a week or two? > I think they are best bumped to 3.2.3, and only fix in 3.2.2 depending on when Stephane can do the 3.2.2 release. We need to take into account that testing branch32 is not the same as testing the 3.2.1 release, so current branch32 is what we would like the users to have. Benny > > -Doug > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Jérôme <rom...@ya...> wrote: > >> James said he will use the branch32 version of nar web for Debian, not > the > >> one in the 3.2.1 package, other packagers might do the same. In that > case, > >> those users will not be hit by the issue. If Stephen does the same for > the > >> windows installer, then that is covered too. > > > > + WebCal.py > > > > > > Benny Malengier a écrit : > >> > >> > >> 2010/4/22 Doug Blank <dou...@gm... <mailto:dou...@gm... > >> > >> > >> 2010/4/22 Stéphane Charette <ste...@gm... > >> <mailto:ste...@gm...>>: > >> > So I believe we need to start co-ordinating the Gramps 3.2.2 > >> release. > >> > We have a NarrativeWeb and/or a python problem introduced in > 3.2.1. > >> > I'm being vague on purpose because I've just skimmed the e-mails > >> and I > >> > actually don't know exactly what has broken. > >> > > >> > I did login to Mantis today to try and clear out and manage the > >> 3.2.2 > >> > roadmap, but I've never done that before and couldn't figure out > how > >> > to even mark the 3.2.1 release as being shipped. > >> > > >> > What I would love to have is a very clear and precise way to tell > >> when > >> > it is safe to build 3.2.2 again. This can be done by e-mail, or > >> using > >> > the roadmap. > >> > > >> > How urgent is this release? If we want it very quickly, then we > >> don't > >> > want a dozen things in this release. I'm guessing all these items > >> > were assigned to 3.2.2 a while ago, and should be pushed out: > >> > > >> > - 0003878: [Search/Filtering] Pivate option and filter on > >> Exporter - new. > >> > - 0003640: [File Formats] Truncated FILE media path on Gedcom > >> export - new. > >> > - 0003735: [Interface] Undo History window crashed - new. > >> > - 0003786: [Interface] TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for > -: > >> > 'NoneType' and 'int' - new. > >> > - 0003782: [Reports] Cannot set max generation on Ancestors Report > >> > (Ahnentafel) - new. > >> > - 0003785: [Interface] Unhandled exception - Undo History - > >> > ValueError: invalid tree path - new. > >> > - 0003877: [File Formats] "alive" and incomplet date - feedback. > >> > - 0002402: [Reports] Line spacing for text not correct in > >> CairoDoc - feedback. > >> > - 0003400: [Search/Filtering] Media Files associated to living > >> persons > >> > are not blacklisted - feedback. > >> > - 0003614: [Interface] undo gives wrong text in menu of what it > will > >> > do - feedback. > >> > - 0002059: [Other] need a way to compare and merge notes - > >> acknowledged. > >> > > >> > If no-one replies by the time I get back to it in about 8 hours, > >> I'll > >> > move all these items out of 3.2.2 and into a future project. > >> > > >> > The next question is...do we have the necessary bug(s) created to > >> > track what we need fixed asap? > >> > >> No. I haven't run gramps since I noticed the issue early this morning > >> (and I just happened to not be able to sleep for a couple of hours > and > >> was poking around sourceforge svn browser). > >> > >> I want to repair narweb ASAP as I spent many hours last week fixing > so > >> many things. But, please give a couple of days to let things settle, > >> and then a couple more to test. > >> > >> > >> I already reverted the change in branch32, so that should be ok at the > >> moment. > >> > >> James said he will use the branch32 version of nar web for Debian, not > the > >> one in the 3.2.1 package, other packagers might do the same. In that > case, > >> those users will not be hit by the issue. If Stephen does the same for > the > >> windows installer, then that is covered too. > >> > >> So, I think we should ship a 3.2.2 quite quickly, but I don't think it > >> must be this week. > >> I'll make a 3.2.3 in the bugtracker now, so we can set up the roadmap. > >> > >> Benny > >> > >> -Doug > >> > >> > > >> > Stéphane > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Gramps-devel mailing list > >> > Gra...@li... > >> <mailto:Gra...@li...> > >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel > >> > > >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Gramps-devel mailing list > >> Gra...@li... > >> <mailto:Gra...@li...> > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel > >> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Gramps-devel mailing list > >> Gra...@li... > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel > > > > > |
From: Benny M. <ben...@gm...> - 2010-04-23 10:59:26
|
2010/4/23 Stephen George <ste...@op...> > Hi, > > > Just to clarify what I think I understand. > > > On 23/04/2010 5:08 PM, Benny Malengier wrote: > >> I already reverted the change in branch32, so that should be ok at the >> moment. >> >> James said he will use the branch32 version of nar web for Debian, not the >> one in the 3.2.1 package, other packagers might do the same. In that case, >> those users will not be hit by the issue. If Stephen does the same for the >> windows installer, then that is covered too. >> >> So, I think we should ship a 3.2.2 quite quickly, but I don't think it >> must be this week. >> I'll make a 3.2.3 in the bugtracker now, so we can set up the roadmap. >> >> Benny >> > > Create 3.2.1 release, however change the files : > NarrativeWeb.py > WebCal.py > > that live in [GRAMPS_SVN]\src\plugins\webreport > > with the ones from the head of the 3.2 branch. > > So in effect it will be a patched release. Is that correct? > Yes, if you do it not that way, you will get a lot complaints as nar web/web cal in 3.2.1 package does not work with python 2.5 which windows still uses last time I saw it mentioned Benny > > Then by the sound of it 3.2.2 will ship in about a week or so time? > Steve > |
From: Stéphane C. <ste...@gm...> - 2010-04-23 16:55:58
|
>> >> Create 3.2.1 release, however change the files : >> NarrativeWeb.py >> WebCal.py >> >> that live in [GRAMPS_SVN]\src\plugins\webreport >> >> with the ones from the head of the 3.2 branch. >> >> So in effect it will be a patched release. Is that correct? > > Yes, if you do it not that way, you will get a lot complaints as nar web/web > cal in 3.2.1 package does not work with python 2.5 which windows still uses > last time I saw it mentioned I think that is a bad idea. Now we'll have some packages with 3.2.1 that are actually almost like 3.2.2, some from 3.2.1 that are broken (I'll remove the .deb files from SourceForge now that I think about it), etc... Let's not mess with version numbers and create a maintenance nightmare for ourselves going forward. I'd rather see us pull the 3.2.1 files from SourceForge, and I'll get the 3.2.2 release done overnight if need be. Thoughts? Stéphane |
From: jerome <rom...@ya...> - 2010-04-23 17:10:17
|
Stéphane > Let's not mess with version numbers and create a > maintenance nightmare > for ourselves going forward. I'd rather see us pull > the 3.2.1 files > from SourceForge, and I'll get the 3.2.2 release done > overnight if > need be. Thoughts? Why not making a 3.2.1-2 ? I suppose that's why there is a release number on configure.in (for packagers or people using sources) : VERSIONSTRING="$VERSION-$RELEASE" http://gramps.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/gramps/tags/gramps-3.2.1/configure.in?r1=15262&r2=15261&pathrev=15262 --- En date de : Ven 23.4.10, Stéphane Charette <ste...@gm...> a écrit : > De: Stéphane Charette <ste...@gm...> > Objet: Re: [Gramps-devel] preliminary details (mostly questions) about the upcoming Gramps 3.2.2 > À: "Benny Malengier" <ben...@gm...> > Cc: "gramps-devel" <gra...@li...> > Date: Vendredi 23 avril 2010, 18h55 > >> > >> Create 3.2.1 release, however change the files : > >> NarrativeWeb.py > >> WebCal.py > >> > >> that live in [GRAMPS_SVN]\src\plugins\webreport > >> > >> with the ones from the head of the 3.2 branch. > >> > >> So in effect it will be a patched release. Is that > correct? > > > > Yes, if you do it not that way, you will get a lot > complaints as nar web/web > > cal in 3.2.1 package does not work with python 2.5 > which windows still uses > > last time I saw it mentioned > > I think that is a bad idea. Now we'll have some > packages with 3.2.1 > that are actually almost like 3.2.2, some from 3.2.1 that > are broken > (I'll remove the .deb files from SourceForge now that I > think about > it), etc... > > Let's not mess with version numbers and create a > maintenance nightmare > for ourselves going forward. I'd rather see us pull > the 3.2.1 files > from SourceForge, and I'll get the 3.2.2 release done > overnight if > need be. Thoughts? > > Stéphane > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Gramps-devel mailing list > Gra...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel > |
From: Doug B. <dou...@gm...> - 2010-04-23 17:20:22
|
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:10 PM, jerome <rom...@ya...> wrote: > Stéphane > >> Let's not mess with version numbers and create a >> maintenance nightmare >> for ourselves going forward. I'd rather see us pull >> the 3.2.1 files >> from SourceForge, and I'll get the 3.2.2 release done >> overnight if >> need be. Thoughts? Mixing does sound messy. If we can swap at this point, we can also pull. I'd vote for pulling it, and getting 3.2.2 out. There is one fix from Gerald in the tracker that would be nice to get into 3.2.2 by the way: http://www.gramps-project.org/bugs/view.php?id=3873 > Why not making a 3.2.1-2 ? I'd be hesitant about changing that---unless it is purely a packaging thing. If it involves changing the internal gramps versioning scheme, then we could have issues with plugin version checking. -Doug > I suppose that's why there is a release number on configure.in (for packagers or people using sources) : VERSIONSTRING="$VERSION-$RELEASE" > > http://gramps.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/gramps/tags/gramps-3.2.1/configure.in?r1=15262&r2=15261&pathrev=15262 > > --- En date de : Ven 23.4.10, Stéphane Charette <ste...@gm...> a écrit : > >> De: Stéphane Charette <ste...@gm...> >> Objet: Re: [Gramps-devel] preliminary details (mostly questions) about the upcoming Gramps 3.2.2 >> À: "Benny Malengier" <ben...@gm...> >> Cc: "gramps-devel" <gra...@li...> >> Date: Vendredi 23 avril 2010, 18h55 >> >> >> >> Create 3.2.1 release, however change the files : >> >> NarrativeWeb.py >> >> WebCal.py >> >> >> >> that live in [GRAMPS_SVN]\src\plugins\webreport >> >> >> >> with the ones from the head of the 3.2 branch. >> >> >> >> So in effect it will be a patched release. Is that >> correct? >> > >> > Yes, if you do it not that way, you will get a lot >> complaints as nar web/web >> > cal in 3.2.1 package does not work with python 2.5 >> which windows still uses >> > last time I saw it mentioned >> >> I think that is a bad idea. Now we'll have some >> packages with 3.2.1 >> that are actually almost like 3.2.2, some from 3.2.1 that >> are broken >> (I'll remove the .deb files from SourceForge now that I >> think about >> it), etc... >> >> Let's not mess with version numbers and create a >> maintenance nightmare >> for ourselves going forward. I'd rather see us pull >> the 3.2.1 files >> from SourceForge, and I'll get the 3.2.2 release done >> overnight if >> need be. Thoughts? >> >> Stéphane >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> _______________________________________________ >> Gramps-devel mailing list >> Gra...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel >> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Gramps-devel mailing list > Gra...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel > |
From: Luigi T. <lui...@ti...> - 2010-04-23 19:37:05
|
jerome wrote: > Stéphane > >> Let's not mess with version numbers and create a maintenance nightmare >> for ourselves going forward. I'd rather see us pull the 3.2.1 files from >> SourceForge, and I'll get the 3.2.2 release done overnight if need be. >> Thoughts? > > Why not making a 3.2.1-2 ? > > I suppose that's why there is a release number on configure.in (for > packagers or people using sources) : VERSIONSTRING="$VERSION-$RELEASE" Because $RELEASE is for packagers; it is used to know the version number of the package for that particular $VERSION of the software. We could use 3.2.1.1 instead (if not 3.2.2). Regards -- Luigi |
From: Benny M. <ben...@gm...> - 2010-04-24 11:32:33
|
2010/4/23 Stéphane Charette <ste...@gm...> > >> > >> Create 3.2.1 release, however change the files : > >> NarrativeWeb.py > >> WebCal.py > >> > >> that live in [GRAMPS_SVN]\src\plugins\webreport > >> > >> with the ones from the head of the 3.2 branch. > >> > >> So in effect it will be a patched release. Is that correct? > > > > Yes, if you do it not that way, you will get a lot complaints as nar > web/web > > cal in 3.2.1 package does not work with python 2.5 which windows still > uses > > last time I saw it mentioned > > I think that is a bad idea. Now we'll have some packages with 3.2.1 > that are actually almost like 3.2.2, some from 3.2.1 that are broken > (I'll remove the .deb files from SourceForge now that I think about > it), etc... > > Let's not mess with version numbers and create a maintenance nightmare > for ourselves going forward. I'd rather see us pull the 3.2.1 files > from SourceForge, and I'll get the 3.2.2 release done overnight if > need be. Thoughts? > Agree For Stephen with the windows install, he needs to decide to or not make an install file for 3.2.1, or to apply a patch before making the package (as doing the 3.2.1 will only result in many support requests with nar web). It is actually quite common in OSS that the version of a distro is a version of a pacakge + distro packages. If you can do 3.2.2 this weekend, then packages can indeed just skip 3.2.1, which is probably best. Benny > Stéphane |